Re: [PATCH] per-process securebits

2008-02-04 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 18:17:22 + Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri 2008-02-01 20:07:01, James Morris wrote: On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: Really? I'd feel a lot more comfortable if yesterday's version 1 had led to a stream of comments from

Re: [PATCH] per-process securebits

2008-02-04 Thread Ismail Dönmez
At Monday 04 February 2008 around 18:45:24 Serge E. Hallyn wrote: Quoting Andrew G. Morgan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ismail D??nmez wrote: | What I meant to ask was what does per-process securebits brings as extra. It allows you to create