Fwd: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] Add qt840a

2014-05-16 Thread Amit Kucheria
Resending because my earlier reply bounced. -- Forwarded message -- From: Amit Kucheria amit.kuche...@verdurent.com Date: Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:26 AM Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] Add qt840a To: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com Cc: linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com On Thu,

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v4 6/9] regulator: AXP20x: Add support for regulators subsystem

2014-05-16 Thread Carlo Caione
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Boris BREZILLON boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com wrote: Hello Carlo, On 11/04/2014 11:38, Carlo Caione wrote: AXP202 and AXP209 come with two synchronous step-down DC-DCs and five LDOs. This patch introduces basic support for those regulators.

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] Add qt840a

2014-05-16 Thread Amit Kucheria
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, On 05/15/2014 08:56 PM, Amit Kucheria wrote: On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:41 PM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, Thanks for the patch. Looking at the outside of the qt840a box, I believe it is the same

Re: [linux-sunxi] [RFC PATCH u-boot-sunxi] sunxi: use TWI1 for I2C outside of SPL for EEPROM access

2014-05-16 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 05/16/2014 01:32 PM, Jonathan Liu wrote: This allows accessing the EEPROM on the Olimex A20-OLinuXino-MICRO using the i2c command. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Liu net...@gmail.com p.s. I don't know what you want this for, but if it is for the purpose of getting fixed MAC addresses for

Re: [linux-sunxi] [RFC PATCH u-boot-sunxi] sunxi: use TWI1 for I2C outside of SPL for EEPROM access

2014-05-16 Thread Jonathan Liu
On 17/05/2014 12:01 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 05/16/2014 01:32 PM, Jonathan Liu wrote: This allows accessing the EEPROM on the Olimex A20-OLinuXino-MICRO using the i2c command. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Liu net...@gmail.com p.s. I don't know what you want this for, but if it is for the

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH u-boot-sunxi] sunxi: support Thumb2 for FEL

2014-05-16 Thread Ian Campbell
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 20:19 +0300, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: On Fri, 16 May 2014 17:04:32 +0100 Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote: On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 18:05 +0300, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: The FEL SPL entry point at the address 0x2000 starts execution in the ARM mode. So we need

Re: [linux-sunxi] [RFC PATCH u-boot-sunxi] sunxi: use TWI1 for I2C outside of SPL for EEPROM access

2014-05-16 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 05/16/2014 04:21 PM, Jonathan Liu wrote: On 17/05/2014 12:01 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 05/16/2014 01:32 PM, Jonathan Liu wrote: This allows accessing the EEPROM on the Olimex A20-OLinuXino-MICRO using the i2c command. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Liu net...@gmail.com p.s. I

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH u-boot-sunxi] sunxi: support Thumb2 for FEL

2014-05-16 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 05/16/2014 08:20 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 20:19 +0300, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: On Fri, 16 May 2014 17:04:32 +0100 Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote: On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 18:05 +0300, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: The FEL SPL entry point at the address 0x2000

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH u-boot-sunxi] sunxi: support Thumb2 for FEL

2014-05-16 Thread Henrik Nordström
fre 2014-05-16 klockan 17:04 +0100 skrev Ian Campbell: On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 18:05 +0300, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: The FEL SPL entry point at the address 0x2000 starts execution in the ARM mode. So we need to make sure that this particular code is also compiled for the ARM mode. The rest of

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH u-boot-sunxi] sunxi: support Thumb2 for FEL

2014-05-16 Thread Siarhei Siamashka
On Fri, 16 May 2014 21:18:35 +0200 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, On 05/16/2014 08:20 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 20:19 +0300, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: On Fri, 16 May 2014 17:04:32 +0100 Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote: On Fri, 2014-05-16 at

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH u-boot-sunxi] sunxi: support Thumb2 for FEL

2014-05-16 Thread Ian Campbell
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 23:11 +0300, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: I think this change is an improvement, but if we do this, we also need to upstream it. Ian what is your take on this? IOW are you ok with my applying this to the u-boot-sunxi git repo ? While things aren't yet upstream I'm in two

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH] Revert gpio: Oscillate option

2014-05-16 Thread Ian Campbell
This reverts commits d104fc0ee38a and af9f4057a591. Henrik says in https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/linux-sunxi/nSKH4IcTaX8/YBVQLMrzfKwJ: GPIO_OSCILLATE is a hack in our u-boot used for measuring PIO performance. Should likely be removed. This is one less thing to worry about for