On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 07:13:22AM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 28 August 2014 12:08, Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:57:29PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Hello,
On 27 August 2014 17:42, Maxime Ripard maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 02:15:40PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 08/27/2014 04:16 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
[...]
Hmm I see, in my mind the problem is not that the clk framework disables
unused clocks, but that no one is marking the clocks in question as used.
Someone should mark these
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 08:48:42AM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 29 August 2014 08:19, Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 07:13:22AM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 28 August 2014 12:08, Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27,
Am 29.08.2014 um 01:29 schrieb Luc Verhaegen l...@skynet.be:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:04:24AM +0200, Dorian Meid wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering why there are so many unresponded pull requests for
sunxi-boars goning back till january without any discussion.
I don't wnat to complain, all
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:34:58PM -0400, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 August 2014 16:33, jonsm...@gmail.com jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
ge...@linux-m68k.org
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 09:14:20AM +0200, Dorian Meid wrote:
The device I'm particulary interested in is the Olimex A20 SOM.
There is a the page http://linux-sunxi.org/Olimex_A20-SOM for it and that
page referrs to a non existing fex, so I created one.
I also have a tested layer for the
Hi,
On 08/29/2014 09:01 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 02:15:40PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 08/27/2014 04:16 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
[...]
Hmm I see, in my mind the problem is not that the clk framework disables
unused clocks, but that no one is marking the clocks
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 09:19:13AM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 09:14:20AM +0200, Dorian Meid wrote:
The device I'm particulary interested in is the Olimex A20 SOM.
There is a the page http://linux-sunxi.org/Olimex_A20-SOM for it and that
page referrs to a non
HI Luc,
On Wednesday, August 27, 2014 5:21:35 PM UTC+3, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
In order to satisfy wikipedia, i have to provide a more reliable source
than our wiki. Plus, i am sure that very few of those who were stating
that GPL violations are not as important as getting an email address,
Hello,
when I have onboard USB WiFi I have something like this in fex file:
[usbc1]
usb_used = 1
usb_port_type = 1
usb_detect_type = 0
usb_controller_type = 1
usb_id_gpio =
usb_det_vbus_gpio =
usb_drv_vbus_gpio = port:PG1110default0
usb_host_init_state = 0
[usb_wifi_para]
usb_wifi_used = 1
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 09:23:41AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 08/29/2014 09:01 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 02:15:40PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
[...]
2) Tie these resources to simplefb so that the kernel can know when they
are no longer in use, and it may e.g.
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 01:00:10AM -0700, Robert Berger wrote:
HI Luc,
I think the main issue here is how someone can possibly use a chipset where
the software comes with GPL violations in a product and sell this product
worldwide.
I am not a lawyer, but my understanding is that the
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 10:29:58AM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 01:00:10AM -0700, Robert Berger wrote:
HI Luc,
I think the main issue here is how someone can possibly use a chipset where
the software comes with GPL violations in a product and sell this product
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Paul Kocialkowski cont...@paulk.fr wrote:
Le jeudi 28 août 2014 à 10:07 +0300, Simos Xenitellis a écrit :
It is indeed bad blood. Let's see a few:
What exactly is your point here? Who cares that GPL violations
personally annoy people in addition to being
Hello,
I have tried to extract the firmware from a tablet and I get 2
firmwares with the partial firmware method and 1 different with the
full firmware method.
The touchscreen on the tablet is broken so I am not sure if I can tell
which is correct if any but the tablet is definitely 800x480 and
Hi Michal,
The screen resolution may not match the touch resolution, but I wouldn't
expect it to be that different.
So I'd think it would be the one that isn't 1280.
What happens when it tries to load the other firmware? Can you send the
dmesg log, there might be some tell tell in there.
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 14:59:48 +0300 Simos Xenitellis
simos.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
It has been said already that there are two main options:
1. Start working at once with the AW engineers to send upstream any
code that is missing (Linux kernel drivers, make upstream u-boot work
with
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 08:29:33AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:46:03PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:11:41PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
[...]
Then since firmware already knows what it set up it can tell the
kernel to not touch those.
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 09:01:17AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
I would think the memory should still be reserved anyway to make sure
nothing else is writing over it. And it's in the device tree anyway
because the driver needs to know where to put framebuffer content. So
the point I was trying
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 03:57:08PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 08:29:33AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:46:03PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:11:41PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
[...]
Then since firmware
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 04:12:44PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 09:01:17AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
I would think the memory should still be reserved anyway to make sure
nothing else is writing over it. And it's in the device tree anyway
because the driver needs
On 29 August 2014 16:38, Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 04:12:44PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 09:01:17AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
I would think the memory should still be reserved anyway to make sure
nothing else is writing
I think the main issue here is how someone can possibly use a chipset where
the software comes with GPL violations in a product and sell this product
worldwide.
I am not a lawyer, but my understanding is that the copyright holder can
file a law suite against whoever sold the product if
the question going through my head is:
are the blobs in question derived from (L)GPL code?
if not, then there is no violation
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
linux-sunxi group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 17:26:58 +0100 Simon Kenyon
simoncken...@gmail.com wrote:
the question going through my head is:
are the blobs in question derived from (L)GPL code?
if not, then there is no violation
Did you try to look at our wiki?
There was one person that spend considerable amount of
Hello,
Actually I've no news to use native XBMC player with hardware
acceleration on my A20 device.
I'm in touch with the developer of the Gotham-A10 fork. As soon I get
news I'll update it here.
Meanwhile I'm trying to use the external player (mplayer) to play
videos. From the cli, the
This email got somehow lost.
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 14:30:57 +0100 Manuel Braga mul.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 14:59:48 +0300 Simos Xenitellis
simos.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
We have the opportunity to draw a line and move forward.
Which one is the smartest option?
It has been said already that there are two main options:
Your options seem awfully black/white. The way I see it, the issue with
GPL compliance is not that we first need Allwinner to clean up his act
(option 2), but just to acknowledge that this is a problem that needs
fixing and that they
Updating status... Guys, I'm using same thread because the subject seems ok.
Should I start another thread for same theme?
Andreas, XBMC still crashing after some time (always +1h), even after include
layera.scn_win.height = g_height;
layera.mode = DISP_LAYER_WORK_MODE_NORMAL;
+
+
Can you send me url for video are you playing? I would like to test same file
here with frodo/rella.
I tried today some clips and is all ok in my setup:
http://download2.dvdloc8.com/trailers/divxdigest/simpsons_movie_1080p_hddvd_trailer.zip
Hello,
This should cover more recent cheap A13 tablets.
It appears CONS_INDEX option in u-boot was what earlier prevented booting from
SD card on iNet 86VS so removing it from the generic A13 tablet config.
Adding specific configs for the teblets for which I extracted firmware memory
settings.
Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com
---
board/sunxi/Makefile|1 +
board/sunxi/dram_inet86vs.c | 29 +
boards.cfg |2 ++
3 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 board/sunxi/dram_inet86vs.c
diff --git
As this entry is promoted as generic tablet bootloader and uart turned
on prevents booting at least on some tablets it should be removed.
Separate A13_MID_UART entry is provided as sample for people who are
willing to take apart their tablet and happen to find uart wired as was
on the original
Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com
---
board/sunxi/Makefile |1 +
board/sunxi/dram_a86v4.c | 29 +
boards.cfg |1 +
3 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 board/sunxi/dram_a86v4.c
diff --git
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com
---
board/sunxi/Makefile|1 +
board/sunxi/dram_inet86vs.c | 29 +
boards.cfg |2 ++
3 files changed, 32
35 matches
Mail list logo
