Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: sunxi: Introduce Allwinner H3 support

Hi, On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:11:38 +0100 Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 16-12-15 08:35, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 04:31:05 -0800 (PST) > > Thomas Kaiser wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Hans de Goede wrote: > >>> > >>>

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: sunxi: Introduce Allwinner H3 support

Hi, On 16-12-15 08:35, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 04:31:05 -0800 (PST) Thomas Kaiser wrote: Hi, Hans de Goede wrote: ? if I understand things correctly your patch make lima-memtester pass at 672 MHz (which is our current configured speed) on

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: sunxi: Introduce Allwinner H3 support

> "Siarhei" == Siarhei Siamashka writes: Hi, > Some outliers are always possible and we have only one sample, which > can be clocked somewhat higher than the others. It is hard to make any > conclusions with the available data and the heatsink may be

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: sunxi: Introduce Allwinner H3 support

On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 10:29:52 +0100 Jens Kuske wrote: > On 10/12/15 03:13, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Wed, 9 Dec 2015 19:29:49 +0100 > > Jens Kuske wrote: > > > >> On 09/12/15 09:40, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: > >> The read delays

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: sunxi: Introduce Allwinner H3 support

Siarhei Siamashka wrote: > Unless we get more test results in a few days which radically change > the statistics, probably using 624 MHz for DRAM on Orange Pi PC would > be reasonable. I second that while also asking the overclocker community for help:

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: sunxi: Introduce Allwinner H3 support

On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 04:31:05 -0800 (PST) Thomas Kaiser wrote: > Hi, > > Hans de Goede wrote: > > > > ? if I understand things correctly your patch make lima-memtester pass > > at 672 MHz (which is our current configured speed) on both your > > and Siarhei's

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: sunxi: Introduce Allwinner H3 support

On 10/12/15 03:13, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, 9 Dec 2015 19:29:49 +0100 > Jens Kuske wrote: > >> On 09/12/15 09:40, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: >>> Thanks for the explanations. I finally got lima-memtester up and >>> running on H3 hardware (not that it was

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: sunxi: Introduce Allwinner H3 support

On 09/12/15 09:40, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: > On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 18:22:10 +0100 > Jens Kuske wrote: > >> On 13/11/15 13:36, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: >>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 18:26:54 +0100 >>> Jens Kuske wrote: >>> Based on some guessing and

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: sunxi: Introduce Allwinner H3 support

Hello, On Wed, 9 Dec 2015 19:29:49 +0100 Jens Kuske wrote: > On 09/12/15 09:40, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: > > Thanks for the explanations. I finally got lima-memtester up and > > running on H3 hardware (not that it was difficult, but just the amount > > of unnecessary

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: sunxi: Introduce Allwinner H3 support

Hi, On 11/13/2015 01:36 PM, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 18:26:54 +0100 Jens Kuske wrote: Based on some guessing and comparing with the parts I initially started disassembling (before this SDK appeared), I think it's I20. The I20 dram init code matched

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: sunxi: Introduce Allwinner H3 support

On 13/11/15 13:36, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: > On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 18:26:54 +0100 > Jens Kuske wrote: > >> Based on some guessing and comparing with the parts I initially started >> disassembling (before this SDK appeared), I think it's I20. The I20 dram >> init code matched

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: sunxi: Introduce Allwinner H3 support

On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 18:26:54 +0100 Jens Kuske wrote: > Based on some guessing and comparing with the parts I initially started > disassembling (before this SDK appeared), I think it's I20. The I20 dram > init code matched the disassembled parts exactly, except the ZQ >

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: sunxi: Introduce Allwinner H3 support

Hi, On 11-11-15 04:40, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: BTW, is anybody already planning to work on HDMI video support for U-Boot? Not that I know of, the H3 (and other new SoCs) have a new display output pipeline. So it is probably best to just start a whole new u-boot display driver for this.

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: sunxi: Introduce Allwinner H3 support

Hi Siarhei, On 11/11/15 04:40, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: > On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 13:52:38 +0200 > Jens Kuske wrote: > >> >> On 22/10/15 10:49, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 22-10-15 09:49, Jens Kuske wrote: >> [..] I don't plan to work on USB soon, my next

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: sunxi: Introduce Allwinner H3 support

On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 13:52:38 +0200 Jens Kuske wrote: > > On 22/10/15 10:49, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 22-10-15 09:49, Jens Kuske wrote: > [..] > >> > >> I don't plan to work on USB soon, my next step would have been Ethernet > >> and finishing the basic

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: sunxi: Introduce Allwinner H3 support

> "Hans" == Hans de Goede writes: Hi, > 2) I see no pmic code in there. I know these boards do not use an axp pmic, > but according to my info at least the Orange Pi 2 (which I have) uses a > sy8106a pmic, it is not entirely clear to me yet if this one needs any >

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: sunxi: Introduce Allwinner H3 support

I have a feeling that sy8106a could be related to Silergy other pmics. Maybe something custom made, with special voltage, i2c address etc. http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rockchip/2014-September/000249.html -Miskab -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: sunxi: Introduce Allwinner H3 support

Hi, On 22-10-15 09:49, Jens Kuske wrote: Hi, On 21/10/15 21:18, Hans de Goede wrote: Great to see that you've started working on this again. Last weekend I ended up working on this too together with Reinder E.N. de Haan (added to the Cc). We took a slightly different

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: sunxi: Introduce Allwinner H3 support

Hi, On 21/10/15 21:18, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Great to see that you've started working on this again. Last weekend I > ended up working on this too together with Reinder E.N. de Haan > > (added to the Cc). > > We took a slightly different approach for the gates clocks,

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: sunxi: Introduce Allwinner H3 support

On 22/10/15 10:49, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 22-10-15 09:49, Jens Kuske wrote: [..] >> >> I don't plan to work on USB soon, my next step would have been Ethernet >> and finishing the basic u-boot support. You know my u-boot H3 wip tree I >> hope? Before we duplicate our work there too...

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: sunxi: Introduce Allwinner H3 support

Hi, On 22-10-15 09:58, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 21:18:45 +0200 Hans de Goede wrote: Great to see that you've started working on this again. Last weekend I ended up working on this too together with Reinder E.N. de Haan (added to

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: sunxi: Introduce Allwinner H3 support

Hi, On 21-10-15 18:13, Jens Kuske wrote: Hi everyone, This is v3 of my patch series introducing basic kernel support for Allwinner's H3 SoC. It mainly adds basic clocks and pinctrl. It also adds interrupts, timers, watchdog, RTC, dmaengine, MMC and UARTs, which are mostly compatible to those