Re: [PATCH v5 17/17] powerpc64/bpf: Add support for bpf trampolines

2024-10-02 Thread Hari Bathini
On 01/10/24 8:23 pm, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 12:18 AM Hari Bathini wrote: On 30/09/24 6:25 pm, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 10:33 PM Hari Bathini wrote: On 17/09/24 1:20 pm, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 10:58 PM Har

Re: RIP: 0010:trace_check_vprintf 6.12-rc1 & CXL test

2024-10-02 Thread Alison Schofield
On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 10:11:14PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 18:31:17 -0700 > Alison Schofield wrote: > > > Hi Steve, > > > > Using 6.12-rc1 hitting this on every trace attempt. > > Is this a known issue? > > No, but the backtrace looks funny. > Removing tp_printk from

Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] llvm-cov: add Clang's MC/DC support

2024-10-02 Thread Wentao Zhang
Hi Nathan, Thanks for your review! See some of my responses below inline. Other comments, including those to [1/4] and [4/4], are acknowledged and will be updated in v3. On 2024-10-01 20:10, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > ... > > maximum value supported by Clang is 32767. According to local experimen

Re: RIP: 0010:trace_check_vprintf 6.12-rc1 & CXL test

2024-10-02 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 18:31:17 -0700 Alison Schofield wrote: > Hi Steve, > > Using 6.12-rc1 hitting this on every trace attempt. > Is this a known issue? No, but the backtrace looks funny. > > --Alison > > [ 110.689666] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0058 > [ 110.6

RIP: 0010:trace_check_vprintf 6.12-rc1 & CXL test

2024-10-02 Thread Alison Schofield
Hi Steve, Using 6.12-rc1 hitting this on every trace attempt. Is this a known issue? --Alison [ 110.689666] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0058 [ 110.691694] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [ 110.693058] #PF: error_code(0x) - not-present page [ 110.

[PATCH] parisc/ftrace: Fix function graph tracing disablement

2024-10-02 Thread Josh Poimboeuf
Due to an apparent copy-paste bug, the parisc implementation of ftrace_disable_ftrace_graph_caller() doesn't actually do anything. It enables the (already-enabled) static key rather than disabling it. The result is that after function graph tracing has been "disabled", any subsequent (non-graph)

[PATCH v10 12/12] tmpfs: add support for multigrain timestamps

2024-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
Enable multigrain timestamps, which should ensure that there is an apparent change to the timestamp whenever it has been written after being actively observed via getattr. tmpfs only requires the FS_MGTIME flag. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Tested-by: Randy Dunlap # documenta

[PATCH v10 11/12] btrfs: convert to multigrain timestamps

2024-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
Enable multigrain timestamps, which should ensure that there is an apparent change to the timestamp whenever it has been written after being actively observed via getattr. Beyond enabling the FS_MGTIME flag, this patch eliminates update_time_for_write, which goes to great pains to avoid in-memory

[PATCH v10 10/12] ext4: switch to multigrain timestamps

2024-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
Enable multigrain timestamps, which should ensure that there is an apparent change to the timestamp whenever it has been written after being actively observed via getattr. For ext4, we only need to enable the FS_MGTIME flag. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Tested-by: Randy Dunlap

[PATCH v10 09/12] xfs: switch to multigrain timestamps

2024-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
Enable multigrain timestamps, which should ensure that there is an apparent change to the timestamp whenever it has been written after being actively observed via getattr. Also, anytime the mtime changes, the ctime must also change, and those are now the only two options for xfs_trans_ichgtime. Ha

[PATCH v10 08/12] Documentation: add a new file documenting multigrain timestamps

2024-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
Add a high-level document that describes how multigrain timestamps work, rationale for them, and some info about implementation and tradeoffs. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Tested-by: Randy Dunlap # documentation bits Sig

[PATCH v10 07/12] fs: add percpu counters for significant multigrain timestamp events

2024-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
New percpu counters for counting various stats around multigrain timestamp events, and a new debugfs file for displaying them when CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is enabled: - number of attempted ctime updates - number of successful i_ctime_nsec swaps - number of fine-grained timestamp fetches - number of floor

[PATCH v10 06/12] fs: tracepoints around multigrain timestamp events

2024-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
Add some tracepoints around various multigrain timestamp events. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) Tested-by: Randy Dunlap # documentation bits Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/inode.c |

[PATCH v10 05/12] fs: handle delegated timestamps in setattr_copy_mgtime

2024-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
An update to the inode ctime typically requires the latest clock value possible. The exception to this rule is when there is a nfsd write delegation and the server is proxying timestamps from the client. When nfsd gets a CB_GETATTR response, update the timestamp value in the inode to the values th

[PATCH v10 04/12] fs: have setattr_copy handle multigrain timestamps appropriately

2024-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
The setattr codepath is still using coarse-grained timestamps, even on multigrain filesystems. To fix this, fetch the timestamp for ctime updates later, at the point where the assignment occurs in setattr_copy. On a multigrain inode, ignore the ia_ctime in the attrs, and always update the ctime to

[PATCH v10 03/12] fs: add infrastructure for multigrain timestamps

2024-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
The VFS has always used coarse-grained timestamps when updating the ctime and mtime after a change. This has the benefit of allowing filesystems to optimize away a lot metadata updates, down to around 1 per jiffy, even when a file is under heavy writes. Unfortunately, this has always been an issue

[PATCH v10 02/12] timekeeping: add percpu counter for tracking floor swap events

2024-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
The mgtime_floor value is a global variable for tracking the latest fine-grained timestamp handed out. Because it's a global, track the number of times that a new floor value is assigned. Add a new percpu counter to the timekeeping code to track the number of floor swap events that have occurred.

[PATCH v10 01/12] timekeeping: add interfaces for handling timestamps with a floor value

2024-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
Multigrain timestamps allow the kernel to use fine-grained timestamps when an inode's attributes is being actively observed via ->getattr(). With this support, it's possible for a file to get a fine-grained timestamp, and another modified after it to get a coarse-grained stamp that is earlier than

[PATCH v10 00/12] timekeeping/fs: multigrain timestamp redux

2024-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
ries - Better separate timekeeping and fs changes - add data_race annotations to per_cpu fetches - get rid of pointless test for unsigned long to go negative - better spacing for declarations and definitions in timekeeping_internal.h - minor style cleanups - Link to v9: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20

Re: [PATCH v2 tip/perf/core 5/5] uprobes: add speculative lockless VMA-to-inode-to-uprobe resolution

2024-10-02 Thread Andrii Nakryiko
On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 12:25 AM Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > On 10/01, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > > > +static struct uprobe *find_active_uprobe_speculative(unsigned long > > bp_vaddr) > > +{ > > + struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm; > > + struct uprobe *uprobe = NULL; > > + struct vm_area

[PATCH] docs: fix WARNING document not included in any toctree

2024-10-02 Thread SurajSonawane2415
Add debugging.rst to the relevant toctree to fix warning about missing documentation inclusion in toctree. Signed-off-by: SurajSonawane2415 --- Documentation/trace/index.rst | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/Documentation/trace/index.rst b/Documentation/trace/index.rst index 0b

Re: [PATCH v9 07/12] timekeeping: add percpu counter for tracking floor swap events

2024-10-02 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Wed, Oct 02 2024 at 14:49, Jeff Layton wrote: > --- > fs/inode.c | 5 +++-- Grmbl. I explicitely asked to split this into timekeeping and fs patches, no? That allows me to pick the timekeeping patches up myself and give Christian a stable tag to pull them from. That le

[PATCH v9 12/12] tmpfs: add support for multigrain timestamps

2024-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
Enable multigrain timestamps, which should ensure that there is an apparent change to the timestamp whenever it has been written after being actively observed via getattr. tmpfs only requires the FS_MGTIME flag. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Tested-by: Randy Dunlap # documenta

[PATCH v9 11/12] btrfs: convert to multigrain timestamps

2024-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
Enable multigrain timestamps, which should ensure that there is an apparent change to the timestamp whenever it has been written after being actively observed via getattr. Beyond enabling the FS_MGTIME flag, this patch eliminates update_time_for_write, which goes to great pains to avoid in-memory

[PATCH v9 10/12] ext4: switch to multigrain timestamps

2024-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
Enable multigrain timestamps, which should ensure that there is an apparent change to the timestamp whenever it has been written after being actively observed via getattr. For ext4, we only need to enable the FS_MGTIME flag. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Tested-by: Randy Dunlap

[PATCH v9 09/12] xfs: switch to multigrain timestamps

2024-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
Enable multigrain timestamps, which should ensure that there is an apparent change to the timestamp whenever it has been written after being actively observed via getattr. Also, anytime the mtime changes, the ctime must also change, and those are now the only two options for xfs_trans_ichgtime. Ha

[PATCH v9 08/12] Documentation: add a new file documenting multigrain timestamps

2024-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
Add a high-level document that describes how multigrain timestamps work, rationale for them, and some info about implementation and tradeoffs. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Tested-by: Randy Dunlap # documentation bits Sig

[PATCH v9 07/12] timekeeping: add percpu counter for tracking floor swap events

2024-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
The mgtime_floor value is a global variable for tracking the latest fine-grained timestamp handed out. Because it's a global, track the number of times that a new floor value is assigned. Add a new percpu counter to the timekeeping code to track the number of floor swap events that have occurred.

[PATCH v9 06/12] fs: add percpu counters for significant multigrain timestamp events

2024-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
New percpu counters for counting various stats around multigrain timestamp events, and a new debugfs file for displaying them when CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is enabled: - number of attempted ctime updates - number of successful i_ctime_nsec swaps - number of fine-grained timestamp fetches Reviewed-by: Jose

[PATCH v9 05/12] fs: tracepoints around multigrain timestamp events

2024-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
Add some tracepoints around various multigrain timestamp events. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) Tested-by: Randy Dunlap # documentation bits Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/inode.c |

[PATCH v9 04/12] fs: handle delegated timestamps in setattr_copy_mgtime

2024-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
An update to the inode ctime typically requires the latest clock value possible. The exception to this rule is when there is a nfsd write delegation and the server is proxying timestamps from the client. When nfsd gets a CB_GETATTR response, update the timestamp value in the inode to the values th

[PATCH v9 03/12] fs: have setattr_copy handle multigrain timestamps appropriately

2024-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
The setattr codepath is still using coarse-grained timestamps, even on multigrain filesystems. To fix this, fetch the timestamp for ctime updates later, at the point where the assignment occurs in setattr_copy. On a multigrain inode, ignore the ia_ctime in the attrs, and always update the ctime to

[PATCH v9 02/12] fs: add infrastructure for multigrain timestamps

2024-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
The VFS has always used coarse-grained timestamps when updating the ctime and mtime after a change. This has the benefit of allowing filesystems to optimize away a lot metadata updates, down to around 1 per jiffy, even when a file is under heavy writes. Unfortunately, this has always been an issue

[PATCH v9 01/12] timekeeping: add interfaces for handling timestamps with a floor value

2024-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
Multigrain timestamps allow the kernel to use fine-grained timestamps when an inode's attributes is being actively observed via ->getattr(). With this support, it's possible for a file to get a fine-grained timestamp, and another modified after it to get a coarse-grained stamp that is earlier than

[PATCH v9 00/12] fs: multigrain timestamp redux

2024-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
This is a replacement for the v6 series sitting in Christian's vfs.mgtime branch. The main changes here are to the changelogs, documentation and comments. The code itself is largely unchanged. The pipe1_threads test shows these averages on my test rig with this series: v6.11:

Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] tracing: Add __print_dynamic_array() helper

2024-10-02 Thread Naik, Avadhut
On 10/2/2024 11:29, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 11:06:41 -0400 > Steven Rostedt wrote: > >> I'm currently adding code where I need this patch too ;-) >> >> I can make a branch that only has this patch based off of v6.12-rc1 where >> we can both use it. Can we do that? > > I tak

Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] tracing: Add __print_dynamic_array() helper

2024-10-02 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 11:06:41 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote: > I'm currently adding code where I need this patch too ;-) > > I can make a branch that only has this patch based off of v6.12-rc1 where > we can both use it. Can we do that? I take this back. I'm doing something a little different (updat

[RFC PATCH 6/7] kstate, test: add test module for testing kstate subsystem.

2024-10-02 Thread Andrey Ryabinin
This is simple test and playground useful kstate subsystem development. It contains some structure with different kind of data which migrated across kexec to the new kernel using kstate. Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin --- include/linux/kstate.h | 1 + lib/Makefile | 2 + lib/test_kst

[RFC PATCH 7/7] trace: migrate trace buffers across kexec

2024-10-02 Thread Andrey Ryabinin
This is a demonstration of kstate capabilities to migrate across kexec something more complex rather than simple structure like in the lib/test_kstate.c module. Here we migrate tracing_on/current_trace and content of the trace buffers to the new kernel The 'global_trace_state' describes 'tracing_

[RFC PATCH 5/7] kstate: Add mechanism to preserved specified memory pages across kexec.

2024-10-02 Thread Andrey Ryabinin
This adds functionality to preserve memory pages across kexec. kstate_register_page() stores struct page in the special list of 'struct page_state's. At kexec reboot stage this list iterated, pfns saved into kstate's migrate stream. The new kernel after kexec reads pfns from the stream and marks me

[RFC PATCH 4/7] mm/memblock: Add MEMBLOCK_PRSRV flag

2024-10-02 Thread Andrey Ryabinin
Add MEMBLOCK_PRSRV flag indicating that we don't need to initialize 'struct page' at all. The flag will be used in the following patches to mark memory intended to be kept intact across kexec. The 'struct page' for such region assumed to be initialized by the old kernel, so the new one shouldn't to

[RFC PATCH 3/7] [hack] purgatory: disable purgatory verification.

2024-10-02 Thread Andrey Ryabinin
Kstate changes data in kexec segments after the calculation of the checksum, so we don't pass purgatroy verification stage. Disable it for now. Proper solution will be later, in next versions of the patchset. Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin --- arch/x86/purgatory/purgatory.c | 2 ++ 1 file chang

[RFC PATCH 2/7] kexec: Hack and abuse crashkernel for the kstate's migration stream

2024-10-02 Thread Andrey Ryabinin
This is an early ugly hack just for now. Will be completely redone later. This abuses crashkernel segment of memory for the kstate purposes to save and restore object descriptions. The proper solution probably would be using segments in ordinary kexec mechanism, however since kstate requires such

[RFC PATCH 1/7] kstate: Add kstate - a mechanism to migrate some kernel state across kexec

2024-10-02 Thread Andrey Ryabinin
kstate (kernel state) is a mechanism to describe internal kernel state (partially), save it into the memory and restore the state after kexec in new kernel. The end goal here and the main use case for this is to be able to update host kernel under VMs with VFIO pass-through devices running on that

[RFC PATCH 0/7] KSTATE: a mechanism to migrate some part of the kernel state across kexec

2024-10-02 Thread Andrey Ryabinin
kstate (kernel state) is a mechanism to describe internal some part of the kernel state, save it into the memory and restore the state after kexec in the new kernel. This is a very early RFC with a lot of hacks and cut corners with the purpose to demonstrate the concept itself. Some parts of this

Re: [PATCH v3] ftrace: Hide a extra entry in stack trace

2024-10-02 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 00:28:28 +0900 Tatsuya S wrote: > > Tatsuya S wrote: > > > >> A extra entry is shown on stack trace(CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC=y). > >> > >> [003] . 110.171589: vfs_write <-__x64_sys_write > >> [003] . 110.171600: > >> => X (Wrong function name) > > > > B

Re: [PATCH v3] ftrace: Hide a extra entry in stack trace

2024-10-02 Thread Tatsuya S
On 10/2/24 10:56 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 14:13:48 +0900 Tatsuya S wrote: A extra entry is shown on stack trace(CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC=y). [003] . 110.171589: vfs_write <-__x64_sys_write [003] . 110.171600: => X (Wrong function name) BTW, instead of

Re: [PATCH 04/13] timekeeping: Add the boot clock to system time snapshot

2024-10-02 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Wed, Sep 11 2024 at 10:30, Vincent Donnefort wrote: > For tracing purpose, the boot clock is interesting as it doesn't stop on > suspend. Export it as part of the time snapshot. This will later allow > the hypervisor to add boot clock timestamps to its events. > > Cc: John Stultz > Cc: Thomas G

Re: [PATCH v3] ftrace: Get the true parent ip for function tracer

2024-10-02 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 14:55:54 + jeff@linux.dev wrote: > September 10, 2024 at 9:36 PM, "Jeff Xie" wrote: > > Kindly ping... Thanks for the reminder. It's in my queue so it should be picked up for 6.13. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-trace-kernel/patch/20240910133620.19711

Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] tracing: Add __print_dynamic_array() helper

2024-10-02 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 18:12:26 + Avadhut Naik wrote: > From: Steven Rostedt > > When printing a dynamic array in a trace event, the method is rather ugly. > It has the format of: > > __print_array(__get_dynamic_array(array), > __get_dynmaic_array_len(array) / el_size, el_size) >

Re: [PATCH v3] ftrace: Get the true parent ip for function tracer

2024-10-02 Thread jeff . xie
September 10, 2024 at 9:36 PM, "Jeff Xie" wrote: Kindly ping... > > When using both function tracer and function graph simultaneously, > > it is found that function tracer sometimes captures a fake parent ip > > (return_to_handler) instead of the true parent ip. > > This issue is easy to rep

Re: [PATCH v14 04/19] function_graph: Replace fgraph_ret_regs with ftrace_regs

2024-10-02 Thread Google
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 19:32:34 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 08:10:37 +0900 > Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote: > > > > > > I may add some compiler hacks to enforce this. Something like: > > > > > > struct ftrace_regs { > > > void *nothing_to_see_here; > > > }; > > > > Yeah

Re: [PATCH v8 01/12] timekeeping: add interfaces for handling timestamps with a floor value

2024-10-02 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, Oct 01 2024 at 06:58, Jeff Layton wrote: V8 ? I remember that I reviewed v* already :) Also the sentence after the susbsystem prefix starts with an uppercase letter. > Multigrain timestamps allow the kernel to use fine-grained timestamps > when an inode's attributes is being actively obs

Re: [PATCH v2] ftrace: Hide a extra entry in stack trace

2024-10-02 Thread Google
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 15:43:35 +0900 Tatsuya S wrote: > > > On 10/1/24 10:47 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 22:27:03 +0900 > > ts wrote: > > > >>> ... > >>> sh-140 [001] ...1.18.352601: myevent: > >>> (vfs_write+0x4/0x560) > >>> sh-140

Re: [PATCH v3] ftrace: Hide a extra entry in stack trace

2024-10-02 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 14:13:48 +0900 Tatsuya S wrote: > A extra entry is shown on stack trace(CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC=y). > > [003] . 110.171589: vfs_write <-__x64_sys_write > [003] . 110.171600: > => X (Wrong function name) BTW, instead of X'ing it out, can you show what that ex

Re: [PATCHv5 bpf-next 03/13] bpf: Add support for uprobe multi session attach

2024-10-02 Thread Jiri Olsa
On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 10:11:13AM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 6:17 AM Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 02:36:08PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > > > SNIP > > > > > > struct bpf_uprobe_multi_link { > > > > @@ -3248,9 +3260,13 @@ uprobe_multi_link_hand

Re: [PATCH v8 01/11] timekeeping: move multigrain timestamp floor handling into timekeeper

2024-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
On Tue, 2024-10-01 at 14:45 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, Oct 01 2024 at 05:45, Jeff Layton wrote: > > On Mon, 2024-09-30 at 23:35 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > I certainly wouldn't rule out a workqueue job calling that function, > > > > but this is something we do while dirtying

Re: [PATCH v8 02/12] fs: add infrastructure for multigrain timestamps

2024-10-02 Thread Jeff Layton
On Wed, 2024-10-02 at 11:14 +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > On Tue 01-10-24 09:34:18, Jeff Layton wrote: > > On Tue, 2024-10-01 at 15:20 +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > > > diff --git a/fs/stat.c b/fs/stat.c > > > > index 41e598376d7e..381926fb405f 100644 > > > > --- a/fs/stat.c > > > > +++ b/fs/stat.c > > > >

Re: [PATCH v8 02/12] fs: add infrastructure for multigrain timestamps

2024-10-02 Thread Jan Kara
On Tue 01-10-24 09:34:18, Jeff Layton wrote: > On Tue, 2024-10-01 at 15:20 +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > > diff --git a/fs/stat.c b/fs/stat.c > > > index 41e598376d7e..381926fb405f 100644 > > > --- a/fs/stat.c > > > +++ b/fs/stat.c > > > @@ -26,6 +26,35 @@ > > > #include "internal.h" > > > #include

Re: [PATCH v2 tip/perf/core 5/5] uprobes: add speculative lockless VMA-to-inode-to-uprobe resolution

2024-10-02 Thread Oleg Nesterov
On 10/01, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > +static struct uprobe *find_active_uprobe_speculative(unsigned long bp_vaddr) > +{ > + struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm; > + struct uprobe *uprobe = NULL; > + struct vm_area_struct *vma; > + struct file *vm_file; > + loff_t offset; > +