Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] add two missing addresses when using trace

2024-03-04 Thread Eric Dumazet
On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 8:01 AM Jason Xing wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 1:10 AM Jason Xing wrote: > > > > From: Jason Xing > > > > When I reviewed other people's patch [1], I noticed that similar thing > > also happens in tcp_event_skb class and tcp_event_sk_skb class. They > > don't print

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] add two missing addresses when using trace

2024-03-03 Thread Jason Xing
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 1:10 AM Jason Xing wrote: > > From: Jason Xing > > When I reviewed other people's patch [1], I noticed that similar thing > also happens in tcp_event_skb class and tcp_event_sk_skb class. They > don't print those two addrs of skb/sk which already exist. > > They are

[PATCH net-next 0/2] add two missing addresses when using trace

2024-02-29 Thread Jason Xing
From: Jason Xing When I reviewed other people's patch [1], I noticed that similar thing also happens in tcp_event_skb class and tcp_event_sk_skb class. They don't print those two addrs of skb/sk which already exist. They are probably forgotten by the original authors, so this time I finish the