Hi,
On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 07:40:08 +0900
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 17:02 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Jérôme Carretero wrote:
> > > > Because with several of these drives / lots of activity /
> > occasional
On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 17:02 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Jérôme Carretero wrote:
> > > Because with several of these drives / lots of activity /
> occasional
> > > issues, it looks like it will be hard to catch (yes I can use
> > > usbmon).
> > >
> > > - It looks like there
On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Jérôme Carretero wrote:
> (Adding Tejun Heo who was assigned on still-open bugzilla #93581 which
> is about SATA but seems terribly related.)
>
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 16:43:14 -0500
> Jérôme Carretero wrote:
>
> > Hi Hans,
> >
> >
> > Tests are
(Adding Tejun Heo who was assigned on still-open bugzilla #93581 which
is about SATA but seems terribly related.)
On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 16:43:14 -0500
Jérôme Carretero wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
>
> Tests are currently undergoing with drives operating in plain USB mass
> storage
Hi Hans,
Tests are currently undergoing with drives operating in plain USB mass
storage class. In a first time, I'm filling drives with data
(uncontrolled corpus, just TBs that I have on hand). It looks like the
drives with most usage history are the ones that drop most often.
kernel: usb