Re: [linux-usb-devel] When will we have just one UHCI driver?

2001-03-18 Thread Miles Lane
Greg KH wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 07:24:19AM -0800, Miles Lane wrote: > > BTW, has anyone given any thought to how much code we'll be > > backporting to the 2.2 series kernel after the 2.5 tree opens > > up? > > As I've done a bunch of the backport work for 2.2 lately, I was going to >

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Anyone know what URB_FUNCTION_SELECT_CONFIGURATION corresponds to

2001-03-18 Thread Dmitri
Quoting Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > So, I translate URB_FUNCTION_SELECT_CONFIGURATION into > > usb_set_configuration() > > and the configuration selected is what appears on the line > > ConfigurationDescriptor : bConfigurationValue. > > That is 1 in your case. > > OK, if I don't have

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Anyone know what URB_FUNCTION_SELECT_CONFIGURATION corresponds to

2001-03-18 Thread Georg Acher
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 12:25:46AM +0100, Benoit PAPILLAULT wrote: > Maybe some guru on this list will give us more information. I'll like to > know myself what is the use of usb_set_configuration(), > usb_claim_interface(), usb_set_altinterface(). Is there a relationship with > the endpoint adres

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Anyone know what URB_FUNCTION_SELECT_CONFIGURATION corresponds to

2001-03-18 Thread Andy Armstrong
"..tom" wrote: > > Hi Andy, > > URB_FUNCTION_SELECT_CONFIGURATION, as its name says, selects a > configuration. In your log (which is a bit odd, I must say, with the many > vendor requests at the beginning), you have URB 17 getting the Configuration > Descriptor. URB 18 uses this Configuration D

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Anyone know what URB_FUNCTION_SELECT_CONFIGURATION corresponds to

2001-03-18 Thread Andy Armstrong
Hi Benoit, Benoit PAPILLAULT wrote: > > I maybe wrong, but I'm doing this kind of work for the ALCATEL ADSL > SpeedTouch USB modem. > That is, I get USB log from Windows 2000 (using a version of Snoopy I > adapted) and try to reproduce > under Linux using libusb. Would you be able to share your

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Anyone know what URB_FUNCTION_SELECT_CONFIGURATION corresponds to

2001-03-18 Thread ..tom
Hi Andy, URB_FUNCTION_SELECT_CONFIGURATION, as its name says, selects a configuration. In your log (which is a bit odd, I must say, with the many vendor requests at the beginning), you have URB 17 getting the Configuration Descriptor. URB 18 uses this Configuration Descriptor to select one config

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Anyone know what URB_FUNCTION_SELECT_CONFIGURATION corresponds to

2001-03-18 Thread Benoit PAPILLAULT
I maybe wrong, but I'm doing this kind of work for the ALCATEL ADSL SpeedTouch USB modem. That is, I get USB log from Windows 2000 (using a version of Snoopy I adapted) and try to reproduce under Linux using libusb. So, I translate URB_FUNCTION_SELECT_CONFIGURATION into usb_set_configuration() an

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Anyone know what URB_FUNCTION_SELECT_CONFIGURATION corresponds to

2001-03-18 Thread Andy Armstrong
Dmitri wrote: [snip] > > Does anyone know what command that actually is? > > You do not need that request. It is already completed by the time > device is enumerated. Most devices have only one configuration anyway. Thanks for that Dmitri. I'll try just leaving it out. I wonder why the Windows

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Anyone know what URB_FUNCTION_SELECT_CONFIGURATION corresponds to

2001-03-18 Thread Dmitri
Quoting Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'm currently working on a driver for 3Com's Homeconnect USB Camera[1] > and as part of the reverse engineering program I'm writing a command > line tool that I can use to exercise the camera using libusb. On Windows > 98 I'm using USB Snoopy[2] to ca

[linux-usb-devel] Anyone know what URB_FUNCTION_SELECT_CONFIGURATION corresponds to

2001-03-18 Thread Andy Armstrong
I'm currently working on a driver for 3Com's Homeconnect USB Camera[1] and as part of the reverse engineering program I'm writing a command line tool that I can use to exercise the camera using libusb. On Windows 98 I'm using USB Snoopy[2] to capture conversations between the Windows driver and th

Re: [linux-usb-devel] When will we have just one UHCI driver?

2001-03-18 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 07:24:19AM -0800, Miles Lane wrote: > BTW, has anyone given any thought to how much code we'll be > backporting to the 2.2 series kernel after the 2.5 tree opens > up? As I've done a bunch of the backport work for 2.2 lately, I was going to follow Alan Cox's rules which st

[linux-usb-devel] Re:USB questions (for the MPC8xx)

2001-03-18 Thread Roman Weissgaerber
Kári Davíðsson wrote: > Hi, > > In the m8xxhci.c hci driver for the mpc one can select to use TIMER1 for > the SOF generator. > A interruopt handler, m8xxhci_timer_interrupt() is registered to handle > this interrupt and generate the SOF. > Why is it then that the timer is also exported to PA6? >

Re: [linux-usb-devel] FTDI driver

2001-03-18 Thread Bill Ryder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ... snip snip ... > > Yup. At leat the Edgeport data suggests that the latency I am seeing > isn't inherent to USB. I'm still wondering if it is somehow tunable > though. I have spoken to Ty about this seperately but to keep the information in the list in case someo