Hi,
I have a host with the folowing component:
- RedHat 7.1 distrubution
- Intel Pentium III 700 MHz
- kernel 2.4.5 without patch
- USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82371AB PIIX4 USB (rev1)
UHCI
- 4 TerraCam usb and 4 usb philips 680 Vesta Pro camera.
The problem:
I run video
Hi!
After some more work on the driver, it's bugfree(tm) now, possibly
except for a couple harmless race conditions and some stuff in the
multicast filters, which I wasn't able to test much. It does about
600-700 KB/sec on UHCI, haven't measured it on OHCI yet.
It should work with the following
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 10:53:15AM +0200, Jean-Jacques Tchouto wrote:
Hi,
I have a host with the folowing component:
- RedHat 7.1 distrubution
- Intel Pentium III 700 MHz
- kernel 2.4.5 without patch
- USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82371AB PIIX4 USB (rev1)
UHCI
- 4 TerraCam
Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
Hi!
After some more work on the driver, it's bugfree(tm) now, possibly
except for a couple harmless race conditions and some stuff in the
multicast filters, which I wasn't able to test much. It does about
600-700 KB/sec on UHCI, haven't measured it on OHCI yet.
Brad Hards wrote:
Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
Hi!
After some more work on the driver, it's bugfree(tm) now, possibly
except for a couple harmless race conditions and some stuff in the
multicast filters, which I wasn't able to test much. It does about
600-700 KB/sec on UHCI, haven't
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 01:23:14PM -0400, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
From: Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 00:42:16 +0200
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39238
I think I'll just take that flag off from the read URB for
From: Vojtech Pavlik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] What about NO_FSBR in acm
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 18:59:08 +0200
From: Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 00:42:16 +0200
On Wednesday, 13. June 2001 23:12, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
From: Wolfgang Mües [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you explain timeout is in jiffies to a user who don't know
anything about jiffies and ticks ?
Wolfgang is trying his best to be difficult, so I am not
replying to his trolling.
Pete,
I do
I'm attempting to write a SANE backend for the Canon FB630U scanner, and
have got as far as dismantling my scanner to find out what Canon aren't
prepared to tell me by telephone.
Essentially, this is a parallel port scanner (based on an LM9830 chip)
with a parallel-to-USB bridge, a GL640 chip
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 01:31:27PM -0400, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39238
I think I'll just take that flag off from the read URB for us.
...and you get 5x slowdown on PCI bandwidth when using modem...
Users prefer 5x
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 11:11:03PM +0200, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
...
Perhaps there is indeed something with flow control, and perhaps we
indeed need to be able to receive more than the 64 bytes in a frame, but
still if there is any method to do that other than enabling FSBR, we
need to try
Dear All,
Does linux usb driver support USB2.0 spec ? And where can I get the usb device
driver for USB2.0 ??
Thanks
Alex
%{±ºÆÝz÷¥+-²Ê.Ç¢¸ ëS¢éì¹» ®ÞºÇ
éZ²×è®gâzWZ¶m§ÿåËl²«qç讧zßåËlþX¬¶)ߣùbìn±·^½é
Alex Huang wrote:
Dear All,
Does linux usb driver support USB2.0 spec ? And where can I get the usb device
driver for USB2.0 ??
It doesn't in any standard distribution, because it is still being worked on.
So far, we have most of the generic USB 2.0 changes applied to the hub code
(but not
13 matches
Mail list logo
