Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: printer.c patch: new ioctls, bug fixes

2001-12-21 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 01:58:03AM -0800, David Paschal wrote: > > > No, I didn't add them, as the current printer driver maintainer did not > > comment on them. Same thing for this patch, you should also send it to > > him. :) > Who is the "current printer driver maintainer"? Hopefully that pe

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 9 of 12] CREDIT entry added

2001-12-21 Thread Greg KH
Hi, Here's a patch against 2.4.17 that adds Christopher Cheney to the CREDITS file for the vicam usb driver work he has done. thanks, greg k-h diff -Nru a/CREDITS b/CREDITS --- a/CREDITS Fri Dec 21 12:58:15 2001 +++ b/CREDITS Fri Dec 21 12:58:15 2001 @@ -525,6 +525,16 @@ S: Bellevue, Was

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] improved makefiles for usbvideo

2001-12-21 Thread Rui Sousa
Hi, I needed to compile usbvideo outside of the kernel tree and run into some problems. The attached file contains makefile changes that allow to retrieve kernel compile options automatically from the kernel makefiles and .config. It was tested with kernel 2.4.16 but should work with other 2.4

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Large permanent block required

2001-12-21 Thread chris . edgington
> > binary format, then free the hex data. However, when I tried that here, > > my kmalloc failed. Should I be using vmalloc for this operation? > > You can't kmalloc > 128Kbytes > > However before you waste 1Mb of kernel memory on Linux (which is non paged) > perhaps you should put the firmware

Re: [linux-usb-devel] patch to handle module usage counts in usbcore

2001-12-21 Thread Oliver.Neukum
On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 10:31:31AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi, > > > > this adds module usage count handling during probe and disconnect to the > > usb core. It applies to 2.5.1 and is now in the smallest possible form. > > I did not go at the old

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: printer.c patch: new ioctls, bug fixes

2001-12-21 Thread David Paschal
Greg KH wrote: > The patch is word wrapped in places, and will not apply. Can you send > it again (attachment is ok). Hi, Greg. See attached. Sorry about the mangled patch before. > No, I didn't add them, as the current printer driver maintainer did not > comment on them. Same thing for this

Re: [linux-usb-devel] patch to handle module usage counts in usbcore

2001-12-21 Thread Oliver.Neukum
On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, David Brownell wrote: > But the drivers' ID tables are part of the module ... > what's the locking being done to prevent rmmod > during the usb_match_id() call? On 2.5 it is protected, once the module subsystem patches are in, by usb_match_id() not sleeping. As this patch is