Re: [linux-usb-devel] Help writing a driver for usb digital camera

2002-01-18 Thread Bill Bland
Hi all, sorry to reply to my own post but nobody else did and I'm getting a little worried I committed some kind of breech of netiquette in it! I'm probably just being a bit paranoid but would people please let me know if a) yes, I did commit a huge breech of netiquette b) people are shoc

[linux-usb-devel] Slave mode

2002-01-18 Thread Björn Stenberg
Hi. What is the current status of usb slave mode support? I googled around a bit but only found references to some of the recent PDA projects. -- Björn ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/li

WG: [linux-usb-devel] Slave mode

2002-01-18 Thread Wessler, Siegfried
Hi, > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Björn Stenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > What is the current status of usb slave mode support? I I am right now into this theme. We will implement it as easy as possible to use. So all you will need is open, close, read and write. I am that

[linux-usb-devel] usb_find_interface_driver exec context ?

2002-01-18 Thread Praveen
Hi usb folks, Would any one explain me in short, about different context in which usb_find_interface_driver function found in USB.c can execute .. I didn't get the need for doing mutex locks inside it.. Is this function have a chance of getting into sleep any where if it ex

[linux-usb-devel] Macally iWebKey Keyboard

2002-01-18 Thread Andrea Cisternino
Hi everybody, I've been working on supporting the USB 1.1 OHCI host controller embedded in our ST40GX1 processor for the last couple of months. Thanks to it being a standard OHCI HC all I had to do was adding a layer of PCI emulation to our on-chip devices and the peripheral is now working OK (ho

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] urb_t removal

2002-01-18 Thread Greg KH
Hi all, Here's a patch against 2.5.3-pre1 that removes the urb_t typedef from usb.h, and fixes all places in the kernel tree that had been using it. Any complaints? :) thanks, greg k-h diff -Nru a/arch/cris/drivers/usb-host.c b/arch/cris/drivers/usb-host.c --- a/arch/cris/drivers/usb-host.c

Re: [linux-usb-devel] CVS e-mail?

2002-01-18 Thread Matthew Dharm
Just to be sure... nobody objects to my making a centralized CVS repository configuration change? Nobody has commented on this either way. Matt On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 05:54:10PM -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote: > I was just browsing, and I noticed that the linux-hfsplus project on > sourceforge has

Re: [linux-usb-devel] CVS e-mail?

2002-01-18 Thread Stephen J. Gowdy
No objection here. I thought about doing this a while ago but didn't figure it out quickly. If it is easy can you set it up for hndocs too? I'd like to get email when that changes. On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Matthew Dharm wrote: > Just to be sure... nobody objects to my making a centralized CVS repo

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] New VendorID/ProductID for the ftdi_sio driver [patch 2/2]

2002-01-18 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 09:27:37PM -0800, Dmitri wrote: > Hello, All: > > This patch adds VendorId, ProductId for a device (USB-Serial > adapter) that uses FT8U232AM chips. Tested on RH 7.2 with > hotplugging. The patch was generated against 2.4.18pre4 and > is intended for both 2.4 and 2.5 trees

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] TIOCMIWAIT added to ftdi_sio driver [patch 1/2]

2002-01-18 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 09:23:07PM -0800, Dmitri wrote: > Hello, All: > > This patch adds useful TIOCMIWAIT ioctl to the ftdi_sio driver. > It was generated against 2.4.18pre4, intended for 2.4 tree, > and can be added to 2.5 as well. Please run this one by the current author/maintainer, Bll Ryd

Re: [linux-usb-devel] CVS e-mail?

2002-01-18 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 10:25:43AM -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote: > Just to be sure... nobody objects to my making a centralized CVS repository > configuration change? > > Nobody has commented on this either way. You only asked for objections :) Fine with me. greg k-h ___

Re: [linux-usb-devel] CVS e-mail?

2002-01-18 Thread Matthew Dharm
You mean "htdocs"? Yeah, I can set that up too, if you want. Where do you want the message to go to -- just you? Matt On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 10:28:57AM -0800, Stephen J. Gowdy wrote: > No objection here. I thought about doing this a while ago but didn't > figure it out quickly. If it is easy

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Help writing a driver for usb digital camera

2002-01-18 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 11:25:20AM +, Bill Bland wrote: > Hi all, > sorry to reply to my own post but nobody else did and I'm getting > a little worried I committed some kind of breech of netiquette in it! I'm > probably just being a bit paranoid but would people please let me know if >

Re: [linux-usb-devel] CVS e-mail?

2002-01-18 Thread Stephen J. Gowdy
Yes please. On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Matthew Dharm wrote: > You mean "htdocs"? Yeah, I can set that up too, if you want. Where do you > want the message to go to -- just you? > > Matt > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 10:28:57AM -0800, Stephen J. Gowdy wrote: > > No objection here. I thought about doi

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Castlewood ORB USB problems

2002-01-18 Thread Miles Lane
On Fri, 2002-01-18 at 09:56, Tim Walberg wrote: > Has anyone had much success using the Castlewood ORB USB (2.2G version) > on Linux? I'm hoping for some assistance fixing a problem I'm having... I have one of these drives as well, but I haven't been doing testing with it for a while. If need be

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Castlewood ORB USB problems

2002-01-18 Thread Tim Walberg
It happens with raw access (i.e. no filesystem, just badblocks or dd on the device), ext3, ext2, and vfat. I've verified all these (actually started with ext3, and worked my way down to basic access to the device before I figured it looked like either a drive problem (bad hardware, firmware, or pr

Re: [linux-usb-devel] CVS e-mail?

2002-01-18 Thread Matthew Dharm
Done. Try checking something into htdocs and make sure it works for you. The setup should be pretty easy to understand... just look at what's in CVSROOT/ Matt On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 10:57:11AM -0800, Stephen J. Gowdy wrote: > Yes please. > > On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Matthew Dharm wrote: > > > Y

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Slave mode

2002-01-18 Thread Gordon McNutt
On Fri, 2002-01-18 at 05:36, Björn Stenberg wrote: > Hi. > > What is the current status of usb slave mode support? I googled around a > bit but only found references to some of the recent PDA projects. > > -- > Björn > Hi, I searched a while back and found a few USB slave implementations, bu

[linux-usb-devel] updated fxload/hotplug example

2002-01-18 Thread David Brownell
I've updated the text towards the end of the USB page http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net/?selected=usb so it has a more complete example of how to use fxload with hotplug to download firmware. It includes a sample "usb.usermap" file (two different EZ-USB devices) and download script (diff

Re: [linux-usb-devel] CVS e-mail?

2002-01-18 Thread Stephen J. Gowdy
Works great. THanks again! On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Matthew Dharm wrote: > Done. Try checking something into htdocs and make sure it works for you. > > The setup should be pretty easy to understand... just look at what's in > CVSROOT/ > > Matt > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 10:57:11AM -0800, Stephe

Re: [linux-usb-devel] CVS e-mail?

2002-01-18 Thread David Brownell
> No objection here. Me either, though I'd prefer that such email not go to the general list but just to a specific list of folk that want such notifications ... - Dave ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists

[linux-usb-devel] Re: updated fxload/hotplug example

2002-01-18 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 12:40:32PM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > I've updated the text towards the end of the USB page > > http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net/?selected=usb > > so it has a more complete example of how to use fxload > with hotplug to download firmware. It includes a sample

Re: [linux-usb-devel] CVS e-mail?

2002-01-18 Thread Mike Gibson
> Me either, though I'd prefer that such email not go > to the general list but just to a specific list of folk > that want such notifications ... In other projects, I have found that these notifications can become annoying if CVS checkins are frequent and log comments are not especially interest

[linux-usb-devel] Re: cleanup of open of vicam driver

2002-01-18 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > the vicam driver did some things a V4L driver needs not do on open > and failed to manage the module usage count on probe/disconnect. > The patch applies to 2.4.2-pre11 and should fix the problems. Approved. Can you mail it to greg (USB maintainer) for submission?

Re: [linux-usb-devel] CVS e-mail?

2002-01-18 Thread Matthew Dharm
Well, right now it's set up so commits to the usb-storage archive go to the usb-storage team, and commits to the htdocs archive go to Gowdy. That's it. Nobody else gets e-mail. Of course, it's all very configurable. Matt On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 02:18:17PM -0700, Mike Gibson wrote: > > Me eith

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Help writing a driver for usb digital camera

2002-01-18 Thread Bill Bland
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Greg KH wrote: > e) People are silent because they are waiting for you to write a driver >based on your usbsnoopy dumps :) lol :-) > You might want to look at adding gphoto2 support for your camera, > instead of a kernel driver, as that is probably where that kind of >

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] usb-ohci.c cleanup code

2002-01-18 Thread Matthew Fredrickson
This is a patch against the stock 2.4.17 usb-uhci.c file. It causes some allocated memory regions to be cleaned up, pci cleanup stuff, etc. In essence, if your usb-ohci driver fails somewhere in the probe, it cleans itself up enough so that you can do some more testing to the driver without havi

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Help writing a driver for usb digital camera

2002-01-18 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 10:39:02PM +, Bill Bland wrote: > > I have to disagree here. The gphoto web page says that gphoto2 doesn't > really support usb cameras - they are supported by the usb mass storage > driver. Even if gphoto2 did support usb cameras I still don't think it > would make

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] usb-ohci.c cleanup code

2002-01-18 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 05:43:12PM -0600, Matthew Fredrickson wrote: > This is a patch against the stock 2.4.17 usb-uhci.c file. It causes some > allocated memory regions to be cleaned up, pci cleanup stuff, etc. In > essence, if your usb-ohci driver fails somewhere in the probe, it cleans > its

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: PATCH: usb-0114 (usb.h cleanup)

2002-01-18 Thread David Brownell
> But I see what you mean: the UHCI code has a hidden > dependency on that layout, TD_CTRL_LS. (Sigh; the > explicit ones are always more maintainable IMO.) > I'll see about providing updates for those drivers. OK, here are updates to the UHCI drivers to check for dev->speed == USB_SPEED_LOW ra

[linux-usb-devel] 2.5 TODO list

2002-01-18 Thread Greg KH
With the recent lists of what people are going to be wanting to do in the 2.5 kernel happening right now on the linux-kernel mailing list, I remembered that I had wanted to summarise our own thread on the same topic: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10065672101 So I knocked together a

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Help writing a driver for usb digital camera

2002-01-18 Thread Bill Bland
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Greg KH wrote: > Take a look at all of the libusb code in gphoto. They are talking to > different cameras directly through the libusb library, which talks to > the usb device through usbdevfs/usbfs from userspace. > > You might want to look into using libusb, or usbdevfs/usb

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Help writing a driver for usb digital camera

2002-01-18 Thread Johannes Erdfelt
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002, Bill Bland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Greg KH wrote: > > You might want to look at adding gphoto2 support for your camera, > > instead of a kernel driver, as that is probably where that kind of > > support should be (in userspace, not kernelspace.) > >

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: PATCH: usb-0114 (usb.h cleanup)

2002-01-18 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 02:43:43PM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > > But I see what you mean: the UHCI code has a hidden > > dependency on that layout, TD_CTRL_LS. (Sigh; the > > explicit ones are always more maintainable IMO.) > > I'll see about providing updates for those drivers. > > OK, here

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Help writing a driver for usb digital camera

2002-01-18 Thread David Brownell
Let's also not forget http://jphoto.sourceforge.net for those PTP cameras ... there are a fair number of folk (like me :) who prefer such Java tools where they're available. And jPhoto has been working quite nicely for over a year now. > Only some cameras use Mass Storage. Most don't. There ar

Re: [linux-usb-devel] 2.5 TODO list

2002-01-18 Thread David Brownell
> http://www.linux-usb.org/2.5_todo.html > > Hopefully someone changes the format of the file, and the generation > tool (Stephan mentioned he might.) Those things always look good as tables, and color can be used to highlight incomplete things. (red/undone, yellow/partial, green/done?) Number

Re: [linux-usb-devel] 2.5 TODO list

2002-01-18 Thread Stephen J. Gowdy
I'll probably turn it into a php file so you don't need to manually regenerate it. On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Greg KH wrote: > With the recent lists of what people are going to be wanting to do in > the 2.5 kernel happening right now on the linux-kernel mailing list, I > remembered that I had wanted

Re: [linux-usb-devel] 2.5 TODO list

2002-01-18 Thread Stephen J. Gowdy
Hi Greg et al, I've now added a 2.5_todo.php that is linked from the first page. I'll remove the .html and .sh files if there are no objections by tomorrow. regards, Stephen.