>
>Last Tuesday ("Queens Birthday" - a holiday in Holland)
>I did the reading part, and this evening the writing part
>for this animal. I see that you also did reading, more or
>less in the same way, but you did not have writing code?
Yep, me lazy animal. For our app we only needed read-access,
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 12:47:29PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 5. Mai 2002 01:17 schrieb Greg KH:
> > On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 12:03:09AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > under the dynamic scheme, you hand out all a driver's minors at once.
> > > Why did you decide on
--- linux-2.4.18-orig/drivers/usb/acm.c Fri Oct 5 15:06:08 2001
+++ linux/drivers/usb/acm.c Mon May 6 01:51:09 2002
@@ -650,6 +650,9 @@
static struct usb_device_id acm_ids[] = {
{ USB_DEVICE_INFO(USB_CLASS_COMM, 0, 0) },
+ /* Motorola V60C Phone - has non-zero sub-class node
From: Sancho Dauskardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Forget datafab.c for this, as the protocoll is a little different.
>
>Hm. I used datafab.c successfully for the CF side.
>What precisely is different?
It's a while ago, but if I remember correctly, the ACOMdATA (actually
> What I think would be very useful would be if the usb-developers could
> allocate a new libpcap frame type for USB packets.
> And then provide an API in the usb subsystem so that libpcap could
> sniff data in the same way as libpcap today can sniff packets from
> various types of NICs and WANlin
Can you merge this patch into the latest from Linus and Marcelo?
It's against 2.5.13 but, with "-p4", works against 2.4.19-pre8 too.
The fix basically removes a bit-complement that shouldn't have
been there. (Plus related simplification.) That changed the PID,
so that (for one example) only the
On Sat, 2002-05-04 at 19:56, Brad Hards wrote:
> On Sun, 5 May 2002 01:41, Marc Britten wrote:
> > modinfo -p usbcore or modinfo -p usb-uhci both return nothing so i'm
> > assuming they have no module options to turn up debugging.
> I looked at uhci - you might try that (since JE probably does
Brad Hards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also found in your later post.
> The reason why this is needed is that the device is advertising a non-zero
> Device sub-class code.
> That is, the line that says:
> D: Ver= 1.10 Cls=02(comm.) Sub=02 Prot=00 MxPS= 8 #Cfgs= 1
> should read
> D: Ver= 1.10
I fired too early.
Regards
Oliver
You can import this changeset into BK by piping this whole message to:
'| bk receive [path to repository]' or apply the patch as usual.
===
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2002-05-05 12
> Good catch, but unless I'm missing something from just looking at the
> patch rather than the whole 2.5 version of the code, it appears that the
> "usblp->minor >= USBLP_MINORS" error may be improperly handled here,
> because "usb_deregister_dev (&usblp_driver, 1, usblp->minor)" will
> be called
Oliver Neukum wrote:
> you fail to free minors if something goes wrong in probe.
...
> usblp->minor++;
> if (usblp->minor >= USBLP_MINORS) {
> err("no more free usblp devices");
> - goto abort;
>
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 12:57:54PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> you fail to free minors if something goes wrong in probe.
>
> Regards
> Oliver
Thanks for the fix!
> You can import this changeset into BK by piping this whole message to:
> '| bk receive [path to rep
Hi list.
Regarding snooper for Linux.
What I think would be very useful would be if the usb-developers could
allocate a new libpcap frame type for USB packets.
And then provide an API in the usb subsystem so that libpcap could sniff
data
in the same way as libpcap today can sniff packets from va
Hi,
you fail to free minors if something goes wrong in probe.
Regards
Oliver
You can import this changeset into BK by piping this whole message to:
'| bk receive [path to repository]' or apply the patch as usual.
==
Am Sonntag, 5. Mai 2002 01:17 schrieb Greg KH:
> On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 12:03:09AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > under the dynamic scheme, you hand out all a driver's minors at once.
> > Why did you decide on that ? The largest number of devices could be
> > supported if a minor wer
15 matches
Mail list logo