Re: [linux-usb-devel] USB PID question....

2003-01-16 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Thomas Chen wrote: | > like you say:v | > | so... if that is the case... from PC/host point of view... we SHOULD | > | never send out any packet that is has OUT bit set why am i seeing | > | BULK message being queued up with that bit set ??? | > | | > | 0x8280 | > |

Re: [linux-usb-devel] USB PID question....

2003-01-16 Thread Thomas Chen
> like you say:v > | so... if that is the case... from PC/host point of view... we SHOULD > | never send out any packet that is has OUT bit set why am i seeing > | BULK message being queued up with that bit set ??? > | > | 0x8280 > | ^ > | > | this starts happening when the usbseri

Re: [linux-usb-devel] USB PID question....

2003-01-16 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, thomas chen wrote: | | i am not sure if i understand the PID stuff correctly after reading | thru the code and some USB spec | | i thought from my limited reading that | OUT - Function to HOST | IN - HOST to Function OUT: host to device IN: device to host It's basically PC-

[linux-usb-devel] USB PID question....

2003-01-16 Thread thomas chen
i am not sure if i understand the PID stuff correctly after reading thru the code and some USB spec i thought from my limited reading that OUT - Function to HOST IN - HOST to Function so... if that is the case... from PC/host point of view... we SHOULD never send out any packet that is has OUT

Re: [linux-usb-devel] NACK from device

2003-01-16 Thread thomas chen
thanks for the pointers it turned out that it is being queued but for the wrong reason... in the submit_urb.. (this is the SL811)... it checks the RH.DEVNUM (which is 1)... against the PIPEDEVICE which is 2... so it does not send it out and queue it up... and i am now trying to find out wher

Re: [linux-usb-devel] NACK from device

2003-01-16 Thread David Brownell
thomas chen wrote: ohci can handle two urb_submit by DELAYing one for the next frame? No, it handles them by _queueing_ the second one so that it'll start after the first one finishes. In the case of OHCI, the typical case is that the hardware automatically advances that queue ... no software a

Re: [linux-usb-devel] NACK from device

2003-01-16 Thread thomas chen
ohci can handle two urb_submit by DELAYing one for the next frame? i guess the question is that can two packets be sent in the same frame? if not.. then the driver is responsible for delaying one??? i guess that is the problem... the driver i have does not seem to do that properly and slave start

Re: [linux-usb-devel] NACK from device

2003-01-16 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 07:33:14PM -0500, thomas chen wrote: > can TWO submit_urb be performed within the same FRAME? Well UHCI and OHCI can do it, I don't know if your driver can :) greg k-h --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com U

Re: [linux-usb-devel] NACK from device

2003-01-16 Thread thomas chen
can TWO submit_urb be performed within the same FRAME? i basically tracked it down to usb.c making TWO submit_urb request within the same 1MS frame can this be done? or should the lower level driver take responsibility to queue them up and delay second one by one frame ??? basically when thi

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.58

2003-01-16 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Donnerstag, 16. Januar 2003 21:48 schrieb Mike Anderson: > David Brownell [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > Have any of the SCSI people been looking much at SCSI hotplug on 2.5? > > I attach "/etc/hotplug/scsi.agent" from one of my desktops; all it > > does is make sure the right drivers are loaded

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.58

2003-01-16 Thread greg kh
Copied to linux-usb-devel, as they should also see this... On Thu, 16 Jan 2003 12:10:18 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >>On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 11:43:23AM -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote: >>> Well, we only create the host when the

Re: [linux-usb-devel] further proposed small API change

2003-01-16 Thread Wolfgang Mües
Hello Oliver, On Thursday 16 January 2003 00:34, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to propose a small further patch. > > I want to bind URBs to usb_devices at allocation. > usb_alloc_urb (int i, int mem_flags) -> > usb_alloc_urb (struct usb_device *dev, int i, int mem_flags) > and usb_fill_*

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Bug in devio.c

2003-01-16 Thread oliver stieber
On Thursday 16 Jan 2003 8:22 pm, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 08:10:26PM +, oliver stieber wrote: > > Patch taking account of log2 intervals for iso and interrupt urbs. > Do you really want to fall through here? > > greg k-h oops I've put the blank line back in too. --- linux

Re: [linux-usb-devel] ohci mouse lockups on National Geode system

2003-01-16 Thread David Brownell
Patrik Staehli wrote: The freezing lockups only happen when the interrupt load of the system is relatively high and the mouse is being moved during that time. For all of its relative stability, the "usb-ohci" driver did have some issues ... many of which are fixed only in the 2.5 code, though a

Re: [linux-usb-devel] NACK from device

2003-01-16 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 03:27:15PM -0500, thomas chen wrote: > > and there is a prolific 2303 serial converter... it is hooked up to a > small GPS (look like a mouse) receiver running at 4800 bps... So the control messages sent to the device are not completing? The bulk urbs that are sent to the

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.58

2003-01-16 Thread Mike Anderson
David Brownell [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > Have any of the SCSI people been looking much at SCSI hotplug on 2.5? > I attach "/etc/hotplug/scsi.agent" from one of my desktops; all it > does is make sure the right drivers are loaded, it doesn't have a > clue yet about whether/how/where to mount disk

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.58

2003-01-16 Thread David Brownell
Greg KH wrote: On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 11:43:23AM -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote: Well, we only create the host when the device is first attached. After that, if it goes away and comes back, we re-connect it to the old SCSI host. Ick, so when the device is gone, where does the SCSI host go? Is

Re: [linux-usb-devel] NACK from device

2003-01-16 Thread thomas chen
here is the set up i have a ARM7TDMI based board with SL811HS chip running uclinux 2.4.19 and there is a prolific 2303 serial converter... it is hooked up to a small GPS (look like a mouse) receiver running at 4800 bps... Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 03:06:01PM -0500, thom

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Bug in devio.c

2003-01-16 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 08:10:26PM +, oliver stieber wrote: > Patch taking account of log2 intervals for iso and interrupt urbs. > > > --- linux-2.5.54/drivers/usb/core/devio.c 2003-01-02 03:22:02.0 + > +++ /usr/src/linux/drivers/usb/core/devio.c 2003-01-16 20:04:52.

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [BK PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.58

2003-01-16 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 03:14:39PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Greg KH wrote: > > Would it be possible to post patches in general instead of pointing to bk: > links? Some people can't use bk and would like the patches (legal opinion, > not technical issues). All usb patches

Re: [linux-usb-devel] NACK from device

2003-01-16 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 03:06:01PM -0500, thomas chen wrote: > > well... i am getting usb.c complaining about "bulk_msg: timeout" > > and i traced it down to the chip level where SL811 is getting NACK > from the slave (device)... and because of that... the urb->complete is > not getting > called

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [BK PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.58

2003-01-16 Thread Bill Davidsen
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Greg KH wrote: Would it be possible to post patches in general instead of pointing to bk: links? Some people can't use bk and would like the patches (legal opinion, not technical issues). -- bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting thing

Re: [linux-usb-devel] NACK from device

2003-01-16 Thread thomas chen
well... i am getting usb.c complaining about "bulk_msg: timeout" and i traced it down to the chip level where SL811 is getting NACK from the slave (device)... and because of that... the urb->complete is not getting called... and usb task is then spitting out that timeout message is this a non-i

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Bug in devio.c

2003-01-16 Thread oliver stieber
Patch taking account of log2 intervals for iso and interrupt urbs. --- linux-2.5.54/drivers/usb/core/devio.c 2003-01-02 03:22:02.0 + +++ /usr/src/linux/drivers/usb/core/devio.c 2003-01-16 20:04:52.0 + @@ -854,13 +854,21 @@ return -EINVAL;

Re: [linux-usb-devel] NACK from device

2003-01-16 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 01:58:39PM -0500, thomas chen wrote: > i am working on a SL811 host controller in a ARM7 based embeded system > running uclinux > > i am continusouly getting NACK from slave device after a while... Nothing wrong with that, it means the device doesn't have any data to send

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.58

2003-01-16 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 11:43:23AM -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote: > Well, we only create the host when the device is first attached. After > that, if it goes away and comes back, we re-connect it to the old SCSI > host. Ick, so when the device is gone, where does the SCSI host go? Is it still repre

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.58

2003-01-16 Thread Matthew Dharm
Well, we only create the host when the device is first attached. After that, if it goes away and comes back, we re-connect it to the old SCSI host. But, while the device is gone, you've created an association between a SCSI node that exists and a non-existant USB device. Basically, you've got a

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Lacie USB2.0 Hard disk bug report

2003-01-16 Thread David Brownell
Alan Stern wrote: On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Stephen Harker wrote: Trace; c013f258 Trace; c0133a67 Trace; c0133c95 Trace; c0133d03 Trace; c0134c10 Trace; c0134e89 <__alloc_pages+d9/170> Trace; c012fcde Trace; d080ec81 <[jbd].text.lock.journal+5ea5/14284> Trace; c013b314 Trace; c0108f03 Al

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.4.21-pre3

2003-01-16 Thread Greg KH
ChangeSet 1.971.1.5, 2003/01/11 23:45:51-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [PATCH] usb-skeleton MINOR_BASE change USB_SKEL_MINOR_BASE should be a multiple of 16 to work correctly with the way that minors are assigned (in blocks of 16) in Linux 2.4.x. diff -Nru a/drivers/usb/usb-skeleton.c b/drivers/usb/

[linux-usb-devel] NACK from device

2003-01-16 Thread thomas chen
i am working on a SL811 host controller in a ARM7 based embeded system running uclinux i am continusouly getting NACK from slave device after a while... can someone point me to a good resource about the low level usb handshaking??? why is this happening? the same device seems to work ok with intel

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.4.21-pre3

2003-01-16 Thread Greg KH
ChangeSet 1.971.1.12, 2003/01/15 12:51:56-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [PATCH] Add maintainer for USB scanner driver diff -Nru a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS --- a/MAINTAINERS Thu Jan 16 10:51:51 2003 +++ b/MAINTAINERS Thu Jan 16 10:51:51 2003 @@ -1805,6 +1805,14 @@ L: [EMAIL PROTECTED

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.4.21-pre3

2003-01-16 Thread Greg KH
ChangeSet 1.971.1.3, 2003/01/08 16:45:23-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [PATCH] PATCH: more unusual USB storage devices IBM memory key Epson 785EPX PCMCIA slot Konica KD-200Z camera diff -Nru a/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h b/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h --- a/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_d

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.4.21-pre3

2003-01-16 Thread Greg KH
ChangeSet 1.954.1.5, 2003/01/09 01:02:07-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [PATCH] USB: fix ehci build problem for older versions of gcc diff -Nru a/drivers/usb/hcd/ehci-dbg.c b/drivers/usb/hcd/ehci-dbg.c --- a/drivers/usb/hcd/ehci-dbg.cThu Jan 16 10:52:08 2003 +++ b/drivers/usb/hcd/ehci-dbg.c

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.4.21-pre3

2003-01-16 Thread Greg KH
ChangeSet 1.971.1.7, 2003/01/12 23:17:07-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [PATCH] USB: Backport konicawc driver to 2.4 This patch adds support for webcams based on a konica chipset (eg Intel YC76). It is a backport from 2.5 diff -Nru a/Documentation/Configure.help b/Documentation/Configure.help --- a/D

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.4.21-pre3

2003-01-16 Thread Greg KH
ChangeSet 1.1025, 2003/01/16 10:51:04-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [PATCH] Added ids for the Dell Axim and Toshiba E740. Thanks to Ian Molton diff -Nru a/drivers/usb/serial/ipaq.c b/drivers/usb/serial/ipaq.c --- a/drivers/usb/serial/ipaq.c Thu Jan 16 10:51:44 2003 +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/ipaq.c Thu

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.4.21-pre3

2003-01-16 Thread Greg KH
ChangeSet 1.971.1.2, 2003/01/08 16:45:11-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [PATCH] USB scanner driver: updated Configure.help This patch removes the link in Configure.help to Documentation/usb/scanner-hp-sane.txt which was removed by the documentation update. diff -Nru a/Documentation/Configure.help b/D

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] USB changes for 2.4.21-pre3

2003-01-16 Thread Greg KH
ChangeSet 1.954.1.2, 2003/01/06 15:48:16-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [PATCH] zaurus B500 (sl-5600?) & usbnet More Zaurii. That model will be interesting from the perspective of "usb gadget drivers", lots of flexible endpoints are available. diff -Nru a/drivers/usb/usbnet.c b/drivers/usb/usbnet.c

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.4.21-pre3

2003-01-16 Thread Greg KH
ChangeSet 1.971.1.8, 2003/01/15 12:48:51-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [PATCH] : scanner.h, scanner.c: New vendor/product ids for visioneer scanners This patch adds vendor/product ids for two Visioneer scanners. diff -Nru a/drivers/usb/scanner.c b/drivers/usb/scanner.c --- a/drivers/usb/scanner.c

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.4.21-pre3

2003-01-16 Thread Greg KH
ChangeSet 1.971.1.9, 2003/01/15 12:49:35-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [PATCH] scanner.c: print user-supplied ids only on start-up With this patch, information about user-supplied ids is printed only once at startup instead of everytime any USB device is plugged in. The patch is on top of the new ids

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.4.21-pre3

2003-01-16 Thread Greg KH
ChangeSet 1.971.1.6, 2003/01/12 00:01:28-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [PATCH] USB bluetooth: fix incorrect url in help text. diff -Nru a/Documentation/Configure.help b/Documentation/Configure.help --- a/Documentation/Configure.help Thu Jan 16 10:52:04 2003 +++ b/Documentation/Configure.help

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.4.21-pre3

2003-01-16 Thread Greg KH
ChangeSet 1.971.1.10, 2003/01/15 12:50:12-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [PATCH] scanner.c, scanner.h: Remove PV8630 ioctls This patch removes the inofficial ioctls that were used to support the PV8630 USB-over-Parport chipset. They were already ifdefed out. Instead of them, the more generic (and offic

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.4.21-pre3

2003-01-16 Thread Greg KH
ChangeSet 1.954.1.3, 2003/01/08 08:36:06-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [PATCH] scanner.c: remove "magic" number for interface On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 12:40:06AM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > Well, the reason I didn't use one was that I didn't found one in > > usb.h/usb_ch9.h for 16. It's also not

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.4.21-pre3

2003-01-16 Thread Greg KH
ChangeSet 1.1024, 2003/01/16 10:44:04-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] USB: Move the scanner ioctls to usb_scanner_ioctl.h to allow access by archs that need it. Specifically arches that need to thunk between a 32 bit userspace and a 64 bit kernel. Thanks to Dave Miller for proding me to make this chan

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.4.21-pre3

2003-01-16 Thread Greg KH
ChangeSet 1.971.1.11, 2003/01/15 12:51:27-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [PATCH] scanner.c: endpoint detection cleanup This patch makes endpoint detection more generic. Basically, only one bulk-in endpoint is required, everything else is optional. The patch is on top of the PV8630 removal patch. dif

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.4.21-pre3

2003-01-16 Thread Greg KH
ChangeSet 1.954.1.4, 2003/01/08 10:13:02-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [PATCH] USB Serial patch. I got a PL2303 USB serial converter a few days ago, and got your driver up and running fairly quickly. The problem is that I got an oops when I rmmod-ed the drivers. The pl2303 uses two interfaces but re

[linux-usb-devel] [BK PATCH] USB changes for 2.4.21-pre3

2003-01-16 Thread Greg KH
Hi, Here are some USB updates and bugfixes for 2.4.21-pre3. Please pull from: bk://linuxusb.bkbits.net/marcelo-2.4 The individual patches will be sent in follow up messages to this email to you and the linux-usb-devel mailing list. thanks, greg k-h Documentation/Configure.help | 44

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [2.4 bkpatch] ipaq.c: more devices

2003-01-16 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 06:55:07PM +0530, V Ganesh wrote: > > hi, > this adds the dell axim and toshiba e740 vendor/product ids to the > ipaq driver. Applied, thanks. greg k-h --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com Understand

[linux-usb-devel] USB-HID questions

2003-01-16 Thread Bryan W. Headley
HID guys, I took over support of the Aiptek tablet HID driver from Chris Atenasio. Things have been difficult insofar as I don't completely understand the HID spec, and I've been working from an incomplete hardware spec. (Other than that, everything is good!) 1.I have some new Aiptek produ

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.58

2003-01-16 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 09:31:12AM -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote: > Hrm... doesn't this all fall to pot when the device is unplugged and > repluged? Um, how? This seems to work for me, but I don't have a lot of devices here. And if there is a problem, you might want to tell the scsi people, as they

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.58

2003-01-16 Thread Matthew Dharm
Hrm... doesn't this all fall to pot when the device is unplugged and repluged? Matt On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 03:27:00PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > ChangeSet 1.879.76.2, 2003/01/13 17:31:46-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [PATCH] USB: put the usb storage's SCSI device in the proper place in sysfs. > >

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Discussing the URB lifecycle, again

2003-01-16 Thread Alan Stern
[ Since Greg KH and Duncan Sands haven't contributed directly to this discussion, I'm removing their names from the CC: above -- they can read this via the regular mailing list. ] On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Oliver Neukum wrote: > I take it back, there's a need for a TERMINATING state. > Your argument

[linux-usb-devel] =?ksc5601?b?KLGksO0pwM67/b+qwPzAxyC9w8DbISA=?==?ksc5601?b?t862xzMxMMC4t84gwdi68cfVtM+02S4=?=

2003-01-16 Thread NALotto
Title: ´ç÷Ȯ·ü 100¹è up, °¡°Ý ÃÖ´ë 45% DOWN. ¹é¯º¹±Ç ź»ý!!!

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Discussing the URB lifecycle, again

2003-01-16 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > But I have a problem with usb_unlink_urb() and resubmitting, as you > > suggests. > > > > First of all, usb_unlink_urb() comes in two flavours, asynchronous and > > synchronous. If I use asychronous unlink, it may well be the aim of the > > device d

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Discussing the URB lifecycle, again

2003-01-16 Thread Alan Stern
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, David Brownell wrote: > Alan Stern wrote: > > > This is where my lack of knowledge of the details underlying the usb core > > shows through. Okay, looking at hcd.c I see where urb_unlink() is called > > and how it releases the bandwidth. I'm surprised; is it really supposed

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Lacie USB2.0 Hard disk bug report

2003-01-16 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Donnerstag, 16. Januar 2003 16:39 schrieb Alan Stern: > On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > It seems like queuecommand of usb-storage is handed a NULL-pointer. > > From Stephen's ksymoops output: > >>EIP; c01348b1 <__free_pages_ok+2e1/300> <= > > If queuecommand were dereferenci

[linux-usb-devel] kernel halts on loading OHCI driver (ppc)

2003-01-16 Thread cjw
Hi, With any 2.5.xx kernel i tried, my mac with PCI USB card crashes completely while loading the OHCI HCD. Normally I have USB built into the kernel since I use a USB keyboard & mouse, so booting stops and the computer doesn't respond to anything. The same happens with USB built as modules, after

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Lacie USB2.0 Hard disk bug report

2003-01-16 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Oliver Neukum wrote: > It seems like queuecommand of usb-storage is handed a NULL-pointer. >From Stephen's ksymoops output: >>EIP; c01348b1 <__free_pages_ok+2e1/300> <= If queuecommand were dereferencing a NULL pointer, the EIP value would not lie in __free_pages_ok

[linux-usb-devel] ohci mouse lockups on National Geode system

2003-01-16 Thread Patrik Staehli
Hello We are experiencing usb mouse freezing with different 2.4.x kernels (tested: 2.4.1, 2.4.17 and 2.4.20). In 2.4.20 it's actually much more frequent than in the older ones. The freezing lockups only happen when the interrupt load of the system is relatively high and the mouse is being moved

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Lacie USB2.0 Hard disk bug report

2003-01-16 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Stephen Harker wrote: > Well here is a dmesg extract with usb-storage-debug turned on and the > oops and the output of ksymoops. There doesn't appear to be much wrong > with usb-storage? I am no expert... Your system log shows no problems at all with usb-storage. All th

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Lacie USB2.0 Hard disk bug report

2003-01-16 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Stephen Harker wrote: > >>Trace; c013f258 > >>Trace; c0133a67 > >>Trace; c0133c95 > >>Trace; c0133d03 > >>Trace; c0134c10 > >>Trace; c0134e89 <__alloc_pages+d9/170> > >>Trace; c012fcde > >>Trace; d080ec81 <[jbd].text.lock.journal+5ea5/14284> > >>Trace; c013b314 > >>Trac

[linux-usb-devel] [2.5 bkpatch] ipaq.c: more devices

2003-01-16 Thread V Ganesh
hi, this adds the dell axim and toshiba e740 vendor/product ids to the ipaq driver. thanks, ganesh # This is a BitKeeper generated patch for the following project: # Project Name: greg k-h's linux 2.5 USB kernel tree # This patch format is intended for GNU patch command version 2.5 or hig

[linux-usb-devel] [2.4 bkpatch] ipaq.c: more devices

2003-01-16 Thread V Ganesh
hi, this adds the dell axim and toshiba e740 vendor/product ids to the ipaq driver. thanks, ganesh # This is a BitKeeper generated patch for the following project: # Project Name: greg k-h's linux 2.4 USB kernel tree # This patch format is intended for GNU patch command version 2.5 or hi

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [RfC] [PATCH 2.5.54] scanner.c: Avoid crashes when using read/write/ioctl on disconnected device

2003-01-16 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 12:05:46AM +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > This is another try to fix the crashes that occur when a USB scanner > is disconnected while open and write/read/ioctl is called after the > disconnect. This time I've kept all the cleanup bur kfree(scn) in > disconnect_s

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: further proposed small API change

2003-01-16 Thread Brad Hards
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:18, Oliver Neukum wrote: > No. Does that mean you are volunteering to get me a USB2.0 storage device? Note that the Beanie fund still has cash. If you don't ask, you don't get Brad - -- http://linux.conf.au. 22-25Jan2003. P