[linux-usb-devel] Re: PROBLEM: cdc_acm (2.6.11) causes Oops on cell phones powerdown

2005-05-05 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Freitag, 6. Mai 2005 05:11 schrieb Rui Ferrão: > Hello All, > > Just to report what i think is a bug on the cdc_acm driver. > > If while using either pppd or minicom on /dev/ttyACM0 or /dev/ttyACM1, > removing the USB adapter or powering down the attached device causes the > software in quest

Re: [linux-usb-devel] list head in struct urb

2005-05-05 Thread Roman Kagan
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 01:37:30PM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > On Wednesday 04 May 2005 12:19 pm, Roman Kagan wrote: > > struct urb { > > /* private, usb core and host controller only fields in the urb */ > > ... > > struct list_head urb_list; /* list pointer to all active urbs

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Fwd: Re: UHCI resume probs in 2.6.10-rc2

2005-05-05 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 5 May 2005, Stefan Rompf wrote: > you must have either a good memory or a good email backlog ;-) Not as good as I would like! :-( > I've tested with full speed and low speed devices, connected directly or to a > self powered USB 1.1 hub. On resume I get a > > check_and_reset_hc: legsu

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Fwd: Re: UHCI resume probs in 2.6.10-rc2

2005-05-05 Thread Stefan Rompf
Am Montag 25 April 2005 21:04 schrieb Alan Stern: > > Ok. Let me know when you need a tester after 2.6.10. > > Stefan, > > I haven't forgotten your offer! you must have either a good memory or a good email backlog ;-) > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/usb-2.6.12-

[linux-usb-devel] [2.6 patch] remove drivers/usb/media/pwc/ChangeLog

2005-05-05 Thread Adrian Bunk
This patch removes the outdated ChangeLog file for this driver. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/usb/media/pwc/ChangeLog | 143 1 files changed, 143 deletions(-) --- linux-2.6.12-rc3-mm3-full/drivers/usb/media/pwc/ChangeLog 2005-05-

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more "applied, thanks" emails from me.

2005-05-05 Thread David Brownell
On Thursday 05 May 2005 2:20 am, Eugeny S. Mints wrote: > Christian Iversen wrote: > > > > I'm just a end-user/non-usb programmer, and I like those messages too :) > > > > It's much easier to follow if a patch has been accepted or not. YMMV. > > patch tracking system may help. At one level it

Re: [linux-usb-devel] OHCI and suspend/resume problems

2005-05-05 Thread Alan Stern
On Wed, 4 May 2005, David Brownell wrote: > On Sunday 01 May 2005 7:14 pm, Alan Stern wrote: > > David: > > > > I found part of the source for the trouble I've had with root-hub > > suspend/resume on OHCI. It's these two lines near the end of > > ohci-hub.c:ohci_hub_suspend(): > > > >

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Data corruption on usb key

2005-05-05 Thread Alan Stern
On Wed, 4 May 2005, Grégory SCHMITT wrote: > > > > It sounds like the ignore-residue-for-writes patch fixed your problem. > > > > The patch will be included in 2.6.12. The reason for the your slow > > > > transfers is probably that you are still using the "sync" option. > > > > > > I tried to

[linux-usb-devel] Minicom read issue solved.

2005-05-05 Thread monali.katkar
Hello , The minicom-read issue is resolved . It was to do with the non-canonical mode not getting set properly . The problem was that I was handling the TCSETS command in the USB Serial driver ioctl function . On "TCSETS " I used to call my drivers set_termios .However any changes done to termio

[linux-usb-devel] Re: list head in struct urb

2005-05-05 Thread Ian Abbott
On 04/05/2005 21:37, David Brownell wrote: On Wednesday 04 May 2005 12:19 pm, Roman Kagan wrote: struct urb { /* private, usb core and host controller only fields in the urb */ ... struct list_head urb_list; /* list pointer to all active urbs */ ... }; Is it saf

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more "applied, thanks" emails from me.

2005-05-05 Thread Eugeny S. Mints
Christian Iversen wrote: On Wednesday 04 May 2005 18:50, Greg KH wrote: On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 11:16:54AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On 5/4/05, Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 3 May 2005, Greg KH wrote: Just a short note to know that I'll probably not be sending any kind of ACK me