From: Orjan Friberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In my quest to try and figure out why test 14 (control write) doesn't
work with my EZ-USB board, I noticed that sometimes testusb reported
no error even though the kernel log complained "byte 0 is 0 not 2" etc.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Thursday 03 August 2006 10:20 pm, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> :01:0a.2 EHCI: unrecognized capability 00
Looks like some PCI issue; lspci -vvxxx -s 01:0a.2 says what?
This is a misbehaved PCI config space read.
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt :01:0a.2[C] -> Link [LNKA] -> GSI 11 (level, low) ->
>
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 2:49 am, Milan Svoboda wrote:
> This patch adds resume event into gadgetfs.
Actually I recall intentionally omitting this as there'd be
no real point to it ... did you have a use case for this
event that wouldn't be handled as easily by piggy backing
it on the next event
On Monday 07 August 2006 7:55 pm, thien van wrote:
>
> I can not remove this module
> # rmmod usb_storage
> ERROR:Module usb_storage is in use
unplug the device first.
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web
Hi!
Thank you very much for looking into my problem.
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 16:44 schrieb Alan Stern:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Klaus Muth wrote:
> > Am Montag, 7. August 2006 08:43 schrieb Klaus Muth:
> > > I'm trying to read from an Stoneridge Optac Download tool (vend/prod
> > > 0x557/0x2008)
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 06:15:14 -0700 (PDT), "Martin (KaFai), Lau" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aug 7 06:06:43 kafai-desk ub(1.4): resid 0 len 32768 act 32256
> Aug 7 06:06:43 kafai-desk ub(1.4): dir w len/act 32768/32256 [sense 0 00 00]
> retry 1
> Aug 7 06:06:43 kafai-desk usb 1-1: reset high s
Does it have any data I can gather to help debugging? turning on debug message?
--Martin
- Original Message
From: "Martin (KaFai), Lau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2006 6:15:14 AM
Subject: another error with ipod [ub(1.4): resid
This patch adds support for Ontrak ADU USB devices.
Patch is against 2.6.17.7
Feedback and comments are highly appreciated. Tried sending via mutt this
time, so hopefully line wrap won't be an issue.
Signed-off-by: Steven Haigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.17.7-va
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 07:42:06AM +1000, Steven Haigh wrote:
> This patch adds support for Ontrak ADU USB devices.
>
> Patch is against 2.6.17.7
>
> Feedback and comments are highly appreciated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Haigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.17.
This patch adds support for Ontrak ADU USB devices.
Patch is against 2.6.17.7
Feedback and comments are highly appreciated.
Signed-off-by: Steven Haigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.17.7-vanilla/Documentation/dontdiff
linux-2.6.17.7-vanilla/drivers/usb/input/hid-co
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 03:26:59AM +1000, Steven Haigh wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> John Homppi has created a patch which I have fixed up to work with
> kernel 2.6.17.7 and similar and I'd like to put it here for
> consideration into the main kernel.
>
> It adds support for Ontrak ADU relay I/O inte
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Dave Higton wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Alan Stern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 2006-Aug-08 15:30
> > To: Dave Higton
> > Cc: USB development list
> > Subject: RE: [Linux-usb-users] Linux-usb-users
> >
> > Have you installed the most recent version
Hi guys,
John Homppi has created a patch which I have fixed up to work with
kernel 2.6.17.7 and similar and I'd like to put it here for
consideration into the main kernel.
It adds support for Ontrak ADU relay I/O interfaces. URL:
http://www.ontrak.net/products.htm - Table 5 & 6
The patch i
usb 5-5: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 4
usb 5-5: device descriptor read/64, error -71
usb 5-5: device descriptor read/64, error -71
usb 5-5: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 5
usb 5-5: device descriptor read/all, error -71
usb 5-5: new high speed USB devi
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 02:22:24PM +0200, Thomas Sailer wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 14:10 -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
>
> > It was just posted to the linux-pci m-l on Aug-04 and has not
> > been acted on.
>
> I'm a bit worried that just storing a gzipped file as usb.ids will
> confuse users. St
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:22:24 +0200 Thomas Sailer wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 14:10 -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
>
> > It was just posted to the linux-pci m-l on Aug-04 and has not
> > been acted on.
>
> I'm a bit worried that just storing a gzipped file as usb.ids will
> confuse users. Storing
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Stern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 2006-Aug-08 15:30
> To: Dave Higton
> Cc: USB development list
> Subject: RE: [Linux-usb-users] Linux-usb-users
>
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Dave Higton wrote:
>
> > > > If I call usb_interrupt_read() with a timeout of
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, coolant wrote:
> Hi
> I am trying understand the way USB host communicates with the devices.
Have you looked through the USB 2.0 specification? It's freely available
at www.usb.org.
> I do not have any UDC hardware for the gadget side drivers (say, ex. g_zero),
> but I inf
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Klaus Muth wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Am Montag, 7. August 2006 08:43 schrieb Klaus Muth:
> > I'm trying to read from an Stoneridge Optac Download tool (vend/prod
> > 0x557/0x2008) for this European digital tachograph thing (see e.g.
> > www.digitaltachograph.gov.uk/).
> >
> > The Optac
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Stern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 2006-Aug-08 15:30
> To: Dave Higton
> Cc: USB development list
> Subject: RE: [Linux-usb-users] Linux-usb-users
>
> Have you installed the most recent version of libusb? I
> don't know in
> which release async su
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Dave Higton wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Alan Stern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 2006-Aug-07 15:57
> > To: Dave Higton
> > Cc: USB development list
> > Subject: Re: [Linux-usb-users] Linux-usb-users
> >
> > [Moved to linux-usb-devel because it seemed
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, rakesh kn wrote:
> In function rh_call_control , there is no support for
> HUB_CLEAR_TT_BUFFER hub request.
No. This is because rh_call_control handles only requests that are common
to all root hubs. Since most root hubs don't support HUB_CLEAR_TT_BUFFER,
neither does rh_ca
I hit another error with my video ipod (Bus 001 Device 004: ID 05ac:1209 Apple
Computer, Inc.). It happens randonly when I tried to transfer ipod file.
Aug 7 06:04:49 kafai-desk FAT: utf8 is not a recommended IO charset for FAT fil
esystems, filesystem will be case sensitive!
Aug 7 06:06:43 kaf
Somewhere underneath all that sarcasm, I believe that you're saying
that the device is violating the size of the isochronous packets. From
my point of view this means that the packets are too small as I am
interested in getting the device to work, not in fixing its, possibly
broken, USB interfa
Hi,
I just bought a HP branded USB 2.0 PCI controller card (5 port), which
closely resembles the lspci output at
http://www.qbik.ch/usb/devices/showctrl.php?id=61
Here's mine:
01:0a.0 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 43) (prog-if 10 [OHCI])
Subsystem: Unknown device 1631:0035
On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 14:10 -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> It was just posted to the linux-pci m-l on Aug-04 and has not
> been acted on.
I'm a bit worried that just storing a gzipped file as usb.ids will
confuse users. Storing it as usb.ids.gz would make it more clear that it
is a compressed file,
Hi
I am trying understand the way USB host communicates with the devices.
I do not have any UDC hardware for the gadget side drivers (say, ex. g_zero),
but I infer from the description of the dummy_hcd driver, that this can be
emulated.
I'd be grateful if someone could point out good documents
This patch adds resume event into gadgetfs.
Patch is against 2.6.17.
Feedback and comments are highly appreciated.
Signed-off-by: Milan Svoboda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff -uprN -X orig.bak.never.touch/Documentation/dontdiff
orig.bak.never.touch/drivers/usb/gadget/inode.c
new_gadget/drivers
Hello,
I spotted this during my tests with -rt on arm. The -rt patch contains
some better tools
to diagnose problems with locks and some other things...
Original code tries to take semaphore in BUG_ON and then free the memory
with this semaphore.
Patch is against 2.6.17.
Signed-off-by: Milan
>
> On Monday 26 June 2006 3:53 am, Milan Svoboda wrote:
> > +static unsigned int
> > +ep0_poll (struct file *fd, poll_table *wait)
> > +{
> > + struct dev_data *dev = fd->private_data;
> > + int mask = 0;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irq (&dev->lock);
>
> I
Hi!
Am Montag, 7. August 2006 08:43 schrieb Klaus Muth:
> I'm trying to read from an Stoneridge Optac Download tool (vend/prod
> 0x557/0x2008) for this European digital tachograph thing (see e.g.
> www.digitaltachograph.gov.uk/).
>
> The Optac tool is recognized correctly by the kernel as mass sto
31 matches
Mail list logo
