Re: [linux-usb-devel] Disable autosuspend for scanners/printers

2007-08-12 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Donnerstag 09 August 2007 schrieb Alan Stern: Oliver and Pete: Is it possible to replace all those USB_QUIRK_NO_AUTOSUSPEND entries for scanners with a single class-wide entry? Which class? It would have to blanket all vendor specific devices. This is a rather broad swipe. What about

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Disable autosuspend for scanners/printers

2007-08-12 Thread Alan Stern
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote: Am Donnerstag 09 August 2007 schrieb Alan Stern: Oliver and Pete: Is it possible to replace all those USB_QUIRK_NO_AUTOSUSPEND entries for scanners with a single class-wide entry? Which class? It would have to blanket all vendor specific

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Disable autosuspend for scanners/printers

2007-08-12 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Sonntag 12 August 2007 schrieb Alan Stern: On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote: Am Donnerstag 09 August 2007 schrieb Alan Stern: Oliver and Pete: Is it possible to replace all those USB_QUIRK_NO_AUTOSUSPEND entries for scanners with a single class-wide entry? Which

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Disable autosuspend for scanners/printers

2007-08-12 Thread Alan Stern
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote: I'm beginning to agree with Matthew Garrett that autosuspend should be disabled by default except for known-good devices and device classes... We could simply revert to enabling autosuspend only for those devices whose driver requests it. Most

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Disable autosuspend for scanners/printers

2007-08-10 Thread Sam Liddicott
-Original Message- From: Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10/08/07 04:30 =There's no way we could ever get a list of all good or all bad printers, =so no matter what we do, we'd miss some :( But better to miss suspend on some than miss working altogether on others surely? I never

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Disable autosuspend for scanners/printers

2007-08-10 Thread Alan Stern
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Sam Liddicott wrote: From: Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10/08/07 04:30 =There's no way we could ever get a list of all good or all bad printers, =so no matter what we do, we'd miss some :( But better to miss suspend on some than miss working altogether on others

[linux-usb-devel] Disable autosuspend for scanners/printers

2007-08-09 Thread Alan Stern
Oliver and Pete: Is it possible to replace all those USB_QUIRK_NO_AUTOSUSPEND entries for scanners with a single class-wide entry? What about printers? Would a USB_QUIRK_RESET_RESUME entry suffice or do we really need NO_AUTOSUSPEND? If these devices really can't handle being suspended then

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Disable autosuspend for scanners/printers

2007-08-09 Thread Sam Liddicott
PROTECTED] To: Oliver Neukum [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Pete Zaitcev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]; USB development list linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: 09/08/07 20:23 Subject: [linux-usb-devel] Disable autosuspend for scanners/printers Oliver and Pete: Is it possible

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Disable autosuspend for scanners/printers

2007-08-09 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 03:23:11PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: Oliver and Pete: Is it possible to replace all those USB_QUIRK_NO_AUTOSUSPEND entries for scanners with a single class-wide entry? What about printers? My printer suspends just fine, so I don't want to do that for all printers,