On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 02:41:38PM +, Dominik Kuhlen wrote:
> Hello
>
> I diffed the usb.c of kernel 2.5.8 as described in Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
>
> But this patch looks different to the others posted on this list.
> Do you have any guidelines (eg. a/... b/ directories, th
t directories and positions)
> - Dave
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dominik Kuhlen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 4:09 PM
> Subject: [linux-usb-devel] Mistake in usb.c
>
>
> Hell
IL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 4:09 PM
Subject: [linux-usb-devel] Mistake in usb.c
Hello !
After some source investigations I discovered a harmless mistake:
The description of the usb_control_msg(...) function says
it returns 0, or less than 0 if an error occured, but
the us
Hello !
After some source investigations I discovered a harmless mistake:
The description of the usb_control_msg(...) function says
it returns 0, or less than 0 if an error occured, but
the usb_internal_control_msg returns length, which is sometimes >0
(success) or <0 if error.
Thanks
