I decided not to cram the ISO descriptors into the old line format,
primarily because my parser would still choke on ISO no matter what.
I added a new format '0u' in addition to the old one '0t'. So we have
a bit of a bloat, all structures grew somewhat, output lines grew too...
Numbers do not seem
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> I decided not to cram the ISO descriptors into the old line format,
> primarily because my parser would still choke on ISO no matter what.
> I added a new format '0u' in addition to the old one '0t'. So we have
> a bit of a bloat, all structures grew somew
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 11:37:26 -0500 (EST), Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > If anyone has any comments about the bloat or missing features,
> > I'd like to hear it. Alan, does this capture what you wanted for ISO?
> > Statistics is for the next tim
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 11:37:26 -0500 (EST), Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
>
> > > If anyone has any comments about the bloat or missing features,
> > > I'd like to hear it. Alan, does this capture what
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2007, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 11:37:26 -0500 (EST), Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> >
> > > > If anyone has any comments about the bloat or missing features,
>
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:38:30 -0500 (EST), Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> would look better like this:
>
> Interval is printed only for interrupt and isochronous URBs.
> Start frame is printed only for isochronous URBs. Error count
> is printed only for isochronous callb
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > If it ever turns out that I really do need to see the transfer_flags, I'll
> > let you know!
>
> Well, that would be undesirable, because it will cause an API shift again.
> So why not to include it right away? I am not including it right now because
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 22:30:16 -0500 (EST), Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right now, I think transfer_flags would be useless. However I have in
> mind the discussions with David and Monty back last November about
> improved reliability and latency for ISO transfers. One of the outcomes
>
