Richard B. Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, nardelli wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 05:34:41PM +0100, Ian Abbott wrote:
On 04/06/2004 15:59, nardelli wrote:
[SNIPPED...]
= drivers/usb/serial/visor.c 1.114 vs edited =
--- 1.114/drivers/usb/serial/visor.cFri Jun 4 07:
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, nardelli wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 05:34:41PM +0100, Ian Abbott wrote:
> >
> >>On 04/06/2004 15:59, nardelli wrote:
[SNIPPED...]
> >
> >
> > = drivers/usb/serial/visor.c 1.114 vs edited =
> > --- 1.114/drivers/usb/serial/visor.cFri Jun
Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 05:34:41PM +0100, Ian Abbott wrote:
On 04/06/2004 15:59, nardelli wrote:
A related problem with the current implementation is that is easy to
run out of memory by running something similar to this:
# cat /dev/zero > /dev/ttyUSB0
That affects both the ftdi_si
On 04/06/2004 19:04, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 17:34:41 +0100
Ian Abbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I made the original change to ftdi_sio.c to allocate the write urbs
and their transfer buffers dynamically (instead of using a
preallocated pool) and I copied that technique from viso
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 05:34:41PM +0100, Ian Abbott wrote:
> On 04/06/2004 15:59, nardelli wrote:
> >Note that I have not verified any of the below on
> >hardware associated with drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio.c,
> >only with drivers/usb/serial/visor.c. If anyone has
> >hardware for this device, I w
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 05:34:41PM +0100, Ian Abbott wrote:
>
> A related problem with the current implementation is that is easy to
> run out of memory by running something similar to this:
>
> # cat /dev/zero > /dev/ttyUSB0
>
I got bitten by this a couple of days ago. There is effectively n
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 02:47:51PM -0400, nardelli wrote:
> ^*(&*(# editor not copying tabs - I should have caught that.
> Here's another try:
>
>
> This was prepared against 2.6.7-rc2.
Heh, much better. Applied, thanks.
greg k-h
---
This
^*(&*(# editor not copying tabs - I should have caught that.
Here's another try:
This was prepared against 2.6.7-rc2.
Signed-off-by: Joe Nardelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -uprN -X dontdiff linux-2.6.7-rc2.orig/drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio.c
linux-2.6.7-rc2/drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio.c
--- linux-
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 10:59:57AM -0400, nardelli wrote:
> Note that I have not verified any of the below on
> hardware associated with drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio.c,
> only with drivers/usb/serial/visor.c. If anyone has
> hardware for this device, I would appreciate your comments.
>
> A memory
On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 17:34:41 +0100
Ian Abbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I made the original change to ftdi_sio.c to allocate the write urbs
> and their transfer buffers dynamically (instead of using a
> preallocated pool) and I copied that technique from visor.c!
>
> A related problem with t
On 04/06/2004 15:59, nardelli wrote:
Note that I have not verified any of the below on
hardware associated with drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio.c,
only with drivers/usb/serial/visor.c. If anyone has
hardware for this device, I would appreciate your comments.
A memory leak occurs in both drivers/usb/se
Ian Abbott wrote:
On 04/06/2004 15:59, nardelli wrote:
Note that I have not verified any of the below on
hardware associated with drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio.c,
only with drivers/usb/serial/visor.c. If anyone has
hardware for this device, I would appreciate your comments.
A memory leak occurs in b
12 matches
Mail list logo
