On Sun, 27 Nov 2005, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Of course I forgot the patch...
>
> Pavel
>
> Remove useless initalizers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> diff --git
Hi!
Of course I forgot the patch...
Pavel
Remove useless initalizers.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/file_storage.c
b/drivers/usb/gadget/file_storage.c
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/file_storag
Hi!
> > > What's the reason for this prejudice against C++-style comments in the
> > > kernel? I've never understood it... They seem so obviously useful,
> > > saving 3 characters of typing at the end of each comment line.
> >
> > I've never seen a piece of non-crappy code using them... that's
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > This converts comments into C-style,
> >
> > You missed a lot of them.
>
> Yes, I know, at one point I realized you probably liked it that
> way. Shall I resent just the "remove the initializer" part?
Yes, okay. If nobody really minds the
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 22:06:58 +0100, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > It uses 'volatile' quite heavily, and that scares me a lot.
> >
> > Alan Cox didn't like it either, but he wasn't able to give a clear
> > explanation why not. He just mumbled something about C compilers
> > gen
Hi!
> > This converts comments into C-style,
>
> You missed a lot of them.
Yes, I know, at one point I realized you probably liked it that
way. Shall I resent just the "remove the initializer" part?
> What's the reason for this prejudice against C++-style comments in the
> kernel? I've never u
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This converts comments into C-style,
You missed a lot of them.
What's the reason for this prejudice against C++-style comments in the
kernel? I've never understood it... They seem so obviously useful,
saving 3 characters of typing at the end
