Hi,
> Communication would be good. I'm also working on the 1160, but
> unfortunately, I am working with a 2.6.6 kernel and can't upgrade to 2.6.9 /
> 2.6.10. This means that I can't easily share code updates with the rest, as
> it was quite a bit of trouble just getting Lothar's OHCI patch to ap
Hi,
> Flash disks:
> Bus 001 Device 043: ID 0781:5150 SanDisk Corp.
> Bus 001 Device 044: ID 05dc:0080 Lexar Media, Inc.
> (wireless optical) Mouse:
> Bus 001 Device 045: ID 045e:006a Microsoft Corp.
> 802.11b/g adapter:
> Bus 001 Device 046: ID 0707:ee06 Standard Microsystems Corp
> USB 1.1 hub:
Hi. I also have a few USB devices.
Flash disks:
Bus 001 Device 043: ID 0781:5150 SanDisk Corp.
Bus 001 Device 044: ID 05dc:0080 Lexar Media, Inc.
(wireless optical) Mouse:
Bus 001 Device 045: ID 045e:006a Microsoft Corp.
802.11b/g adapter:
Bus 001 Device 046: ID 0707:ee06 Standard Microsystems Co
ednesday, November 10, 2004 12:49 PM
To: Dimitris Lampridis
Cc: Linux USB List
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: more on ohci-isp1362
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Dimitris Lampridis wrote:
> So, what is your status?
I'm stuck in a state, where the driver is sometimes able to
detect and configure
. Let me know, if you want any specifics/operations on any of these
devices.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Dimitris Lampridis
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 7:58 AM
To: Olav Kongas
Cc: xemc; Linux USB List
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re
TED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Dimitris Lampridis
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 9:53 AM
To: Olav Kongas
Cc: Linux USB List
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: more on ohci-isp1362
On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 10:06 +0200, Olav Kongas wrote:
> With this driver, we see quite a bit of duplic
> OK, I did as you told me, but nothing happened. Now it's my turn to say
> that this is normal, because I haven't done a lot of work yet in the
> ohci-isp-emu.c file. BTW, I would be very-very happy if you could
> send me your file (ohci-isp1362-emu.c), so that I can quickly fill in
> the diff
On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 10:04 +0200, Olav Kongas wrote:
> Guys, it would be great if we could compare the results of
> attachment of the same device. Here is the list of my
> devices. See if you have any of them at hand. Otherwise you
> can give your own list and I'll try to find one of your
> devic
On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 09:04 +0200, Olav Kongas wrote:
> > Great, thanks, that did the job. Now I see a loop of roothub reads,
> > RHDESC_A then RH_STATUS and finally RH_PORT_STATUS_[1,2] that keeps on
> > forever. I think it has something to do with suspend/resume. I'll look
> > into it tomorrow, u
> I'm going to try to go through my changes to Lothar's published
> drivers, and try to take out any unnecessary changes. (just in case I
> caused some problems while trying to understand / debug it) Would you
> like a copy of the resultant patch? I wouldn't mind being able to see
> the changes
> Great, thanks, that did the job. Now I see a loop of roothub reads,
> RHDESC_A then RH_STATUS and finally RH_PORT_STATUS_[1,2] that keeps on
> forever. I think it has something to do with suspend/resume. I'll look
> into it tomorrow, unless you already know what am i dealing with...
This is norm
On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 18:49 +0200, Olav Kongas wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Dimitris Lampridis wrote:
>
> > after that. The subsequent ohci_read_control() call and all the rest IO
> > to come, read D > Did you see anything similar?
>
> I did not see exactly similar thing. But I had to add delay
> > after that. The subsequent ohci_read_control() call and all the rest IO
> > to come, read D > Did you see anything similar?
>
> I did not see exactly similar thing. But I had to add delay
> after register accesses into the functions like
> HC_ISP1362_READ_DATA32. I used ndelay(150) though it
>
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Dimitris Lampridis wrote:
> So, what is your status?
I'm stuck in a state, where the driver is sometimes able to
detect and configure storage devices to the point where they
are recognized as scsi devices by usb core. I haven't tried
mounting them though. But with majority of
On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 10:06 +0200, Olav Kongas wrote:
> With this driver, we see quite a bit of duplicated effort.
> Sure we could reduce this by communicating more. So, thanks
> for posting this type of info. I try to be more open too.
>
hi Olav,
you're right. We both work on porting the code t
15 matches
Mail list logo
