On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Boris Dinkevich wrote:
> > > Is it me doing something wrong ?
> >
> >I don't know. Exactly what are you doing?
>
> Loading file_storage gadget on 2.4.26 kernel with removable set.
> Formating in windows xp (sp2)
> Connecting to 2.4.24 kernel and getting partition read errors
Are there any occurrences of devices that:
1) report themselves as removable media (in inquiry)
2) are of type direct access (0x0)
3) have multiple partitions on one media
whose partitions are read correctly by Windows ?
At 01:09 PM 10/1/2005, Alan Cox wrote:
On Sul, 2005-01-09 at 15:41, Andries Br
On Sul, 2005-01-09 at 15:41, Andries Brouwer wrote:
> Windows can handle removable usb devices with and without partition table.
> It is quite common for Compact flash and Smart Media cards to have
> a partition table.
Older Windows (98 etc) ignores CF cards without a partition table in my
experie
At 10:25 PM 9/1/2005, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005, Boris Dinkevich wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
*snip*
> Is it me doing something wrong ?
I don't know. Exactly what are you doing?
Loading file_storage gadget on 2.4.26 kernel with removable set.
Formating in windows xp (sp2)
Connecting to 2
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005, Boris Dinkevich wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> It seems like removable usb devices in windows get formatted without a
> partition table
That's not true. In general they do have partition tables.
> (I can't even create partitions on removable devices).
>
> Problem is, Linux
On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 04:24:00PM +0200, Boris Dinkevich wrote:
> It seems like removable usb devices in windows get formatted without a
> partition table
> (I can't even create partitions on removable devices).
>
> Problem is, Linux seems to expect a partition table, and just reads garbage
>
