David,
> Wrong. It just means they're not OTG devices. If the OTG host
> isn't powering VBUS at all times -- why would it? -- then you'd
> rely on the fact that it's powered at least briefly after the
> ID pin gets grounded by the Mini-A connector. So the end-user
> scenario would be to connec
On Monday 06 February 2006 3:21 am, Mukund JB. wrote:
> So, The USB 1.1 Devices which are unaware of SRP & HNP cannot
> communicate with OTG HOSTs. Is this right or wrong?
Wrong. It just means they're not OTG devices. If the OTG host
isn't powering VBUS at all times -- why would it? -- then you
nd JB.
> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 7:08 PM
> To: David Brownell; linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Greg KH; Oliver Neukum
> Subject: RE: [linux-usb-devel] USB Clarifications please .
>
> Dear David,
>
> > There are other interfaces for both full/low speed
On Monday 23 January 2006 5:37 am, Mukund JB. wrote:
> Dear David,
>
> > There are other interfaces for both full/low speed hosts ("USB 1.1" as
> > well as "USB 2.0") and for high speed ones (only "USB 2.0"). Those
> are
> > common primarily because of PCs. Where gate count matters, silicon
> >
Dear David,
> There are other interfaces for both full/low speed hosts ("USB 1.1" as
> well as "USB 2.0") and for high speed ones (only "USB 2.0"). Those
are
> common primarily because of PCs. Where gate count matters, silicon
> vendors may find it better to avoid "standard" register interfaces
On Friday 20 January 2006 1:09 am, Mukund JB. wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> I am trying to settle some more clarification regarding the USB devices.
> Can someone please clarify the following?
>
> 1) OHCI & UHCI are the interfaces developed which with USB 1.1 devices.
> 2) EHCI is interfaces develope
