Re: ./configure - what am I missing?

2004-05-18 Thread Col
Christopher Sawtell wrote: >On Wednesday 19 May 2004 17:35, Don Gould wrote: > > >>Why shouldn't I compile as root? >> >> >Because one day, either directly, or indirectly using a Trojan of some kind, >somebody is going to attempt to do something nasty to your machine. Indeed >that person m

Re: ./configure - what am I missing?

2004-05-18 Thread Matthew Gregan
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 05:35:46PM +1200, Don Gould wrote: > Why shouldn't I compile as root? Why shouldn't you run the commands below as root? # rm -rf -- / # for x in /dev/[hs]d*; do (dd if=/dev/zero of=$x bs=1024 count=10K &); done But seriously, if you care about system integrity or security

Re: ./configure - what am I missing?

2004-05-18 Thread Christopher Sawtell
On Wednesday 19 May 2004 17:35, Don Gould wrote: > Why shouldn't I compile as root? Because one day, either directly, or indirectly using a Trojan of some kind, somebody is going to attempt to do something nasty to your machine. Indeed that person may, accidentally, be you. If you run their hidde

Re: In Action: The First True Desktop Alternative to Windows

2004-05-18 Thread Dale Anderson
Just a pity it is such a pos Dale. On Wed, 19 May 2004 15:04, stringer wrote: > Just got this email today. Thought the group might like to see how Sun is > pushing its java desktop based on Linux > > >Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 18:27:48 -0500 > >From: Sun M

Re: ./configure - what am I missing?

2004-05-18 Thread Jim Cheetham
On Wed, 19 May 2004 17:35:46 +1200, Don Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Why shouldn't I compile as root? The same reason that you shouldn't do *anything* as root - the potential for mishap is greatly magnified. Nearly all OS source packages say "./configure; make; sudo make install" i.e. only

Re: FATAL ERROR: register_globals is disabled in php.ini, please enable it!

2004-05-18 Thread Jim Cheetham
On Wed, 19 May 2004 17:32:32 +1200, Don Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What out-of-date code are you running this time? http://www.oscommerce.com/ register_globals ahould be off, and it should stay off. It is only I wonder if I can turn it off again once the installation is completed. *twitch* I'

Re: Gentoo + fest followup

2004-05-18 Thread Douglas Royds
InfoHelp wrote: Sure, Douglas Royds wrote: Are Mandrake fledglings also welcome? so long as they're legally able to share the amber fluid :-) *Hall authority does allow us a drink* Chris Is that repair help or a Gentoo demo you're after Doug? Just whatever-I'm-stuck-on-now help. Currently gettin

RE: ./configure - what am I missing?

2004-05-18 Thread Don Gould
Why shouldn't I compile as root? > -Original Message- > From: Matthew Gregan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 4:38 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: ./configure - what am I missing? > > > On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 04:24:56PM +1200, Don Gould wrote: > > >

RE: FATAL ERROR: register_globals is disabled in php.ini, please enable it!

2004-05-18 Thread Don Gould
> -Original Message- > From: Jim Cheetham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 4:47 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: FATAL ERROR: register_globals is disabled in php.ini, > please enable it! > > > On Wed, 19 May 2004 16:31:52 +1200, Don Gould > <[EMAIL PRO

Re: Gentoo + fest followup

2004-05-18 Thread InfoHelp
Sure, Douglas Royds wrote: Are Mandrake fledglings also welcome? so long as they're legally able to share the amber fluid :-) *Hall authority does allow us a drink* Chris Is that repair help or a Gentoo demo you're after Doug? Douglas. InfoHelp wrote: *Gentoo Installfest Followup Meeting* *Weds 3

Re: Gentoo + fest followup

2004-05-18 Thread InfoHelp
One root canal down, Christopher Sawtell wrote: >On Wednesday 19 May 2004 13:28, Fisher, Robert (FXNZ CHC) wrote: > > >>I'd like to take it up in this way: >> >>*Gentoo Installfest Followup Meeting* >> >>*Weds 30 June, Sydenham Community Centre Hall, 7.30pm* >> >> > >Is there a sooner date?

Re: FATAL ERROR: register_globals is disabled in php.ini, please enable it!

2004-05-18 Thread Jim Cheetham
On Wed, 19 May 2004 16:31:52 +1200, Don Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: FATAL ERROR: register_globals is disabled in php.ini, please enable it! Ok, I've edited the php.ini What out-of-date code are you running this time? register_globals ahould be off, and it should stay off. It is only provided

Re: ./configure - what am I missing?

2004-05-18 Thread Matthew Gregan
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 04:31:13PM +1200, Derek Smithies wrote: > I think you are also missing the > automake > autoconf > set of packages.. Yes, he is, but he doesn't need them to build this package--the output of the auto* tools is provided in the tarball. You'd only need to install the

RE: FATAL ERROR: register_globals is disabled in php.ini, please enable it!

2004-05-18 Thread Williams, Olwen - SAL
Restart Apache It only takes a moment Olwen Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -Original Message- From: Don Gould [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 4:32 PM To: CLUG (E-mail) Subject: FATAL ERROR: register_globals is disabled in php.ini, please enable it! FATAL ERR

Re: ./configure - what am I missing?

2004-05-18 Thread Matthew Gregan
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 04:24:56PM +1200, Don Gould wrote: > > Why are you compiling as root? > Yes I know you are. I am asking why. Cheers, -mjg -- Matthew Gregan |/ /|[EMAIL PROTECTED]

FATAL ERROR: register_globals is disabled in php.ini, please enable it!

2004-05-18 Thread Don Gould
FATAL ERROR: register_globals is disabled in php.ini, please enable it! Ok, I've edited the php.ini What do I do to make the message go away? Do I have to restart apache to make it pick up changes in the php.ini or is there another way to force it to pick up the changes? Cheers Don

Re: ./configure - what am I missing?

2004-05-18 Thread Derek Smithies
Hi, I think you are also missing the automake autoconf set of packages.. You are probably missing glibc and other such. and some variants to glibc for things like c++. Those variants may not be required. To be honest, you have quite a bit to install. A simple approach is to reinstall,

Re: ./configure - what am I missing?

2004-05-18 Thread Christopher Sawtell
On Wednesday 19 May 2004 16:07, Don Gould wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] poptop]# ./configure > creating cache ./config.cache > checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c > checking whether build environment is sane... yes > checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... yes > checking for wor

RE: ./configure - what am I missing?

2004-05-18 Thread Don Gould
> Why are you compiling as root? Yes > > > checking for gcc... no > > checking for cc... no > > configure: error: no acceptable cc found in $PATH > > You need to install at least gcc and cpp. The exact package > names will > depend on the distribution you're running. rh9 Thanks I'll have

Re: ./configure - what am I missing?

2004-05-18 Thread Michael JasonSmith
On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 16:07, Don Gould wrote: > configure: error: no acceptable cc found in $PATH > > I'm guessing I'm missing the compiler? Yes, it does look that way :) > How do I install that without installing thousands of other bits of crap? You cannot. It is the nature of compilers to hav

Re: ./configure - what am I missing?

2004-05-18 Thread Jim Cheetham
On Wed, 19 May 2004 16:07:34 +1200, Don Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] poptop]# ./configure configure: error: no acceptable cc found in $PATH I'm guessing I'm missing the compiler? How do I install that without installing thousands of other bits of crap? A C compiler is a big th

Re: ./configure - what am I missing?

2004-05-18 Thread Matthew Gregan
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 04:07:34PM +1200, Don Gould wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] poptop]# ./configure Why are you compiling as root? > checking for gcc... no > checking for cc... no > configure: error: no acceptable cc found in $PATH You need to install at least gcc and cpp. The exact package nam

Re: Gentoo + fest followup

2004-05-18 Thread Douglas Royds
Are Mandrake fledglings also welcome? Douglas. InfoHelp wrote: *Gentoo Installfest Followup Meeting* *Weds 30 June, Sydenham Community Centre Hall, 7.30pm* [snip] People wanting to observe / socialise should bring some nibbles & / or a gold coin (hall hire is just $15).

./configure - what am I missing?

2004-05-18 Thread Don Gould
[EMAIL PROTECTED] poptop]# ./configure creating cache ./config.cache checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... yes checking for working aclocal... missing checking for working autoconf... miss

Re: Gentoo + fest followup

2004-05-18 Thread Christopher Sawtell
On Wednesday 19 May 2004 13:28, Fisher, Robert (FXNZ CHC) wrote: > I'd like to take it up in this way: > > *Gentoo Installfest Followup Meeting* > > *Weds 30 June, Sydenham Community Centre Hall, 7.30pm* Is there a sooner date? > I will supply a few beers, as should everyone else wanting system >

In Action: The First True Desktop Alternative to Windows

2004-05-18 Thread stringer
Just got this email today. Thought the group might like to see how Sun is pushing its java desktop based on Linux >Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 18:27:48 -0500 >From: Sun Microsystems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: In Action: The First True Desktop Alternative to Windo

Re: Gentoo + fest followup

2004-05-18 Thread InfoHelp
as am i, transitioning from bronze, to feathered flight (or just plain swim) Fisher, Robert (FXNZ CHC) wrote: I am looking forward to you changing the signature at the bottom of your emails. Regards, Robert Some days you are the pigeon, some days you are the statue. -- InfoHelp Services http://

RE: Gentoo + fest followup

2004-05-18 Thread Fisher, Robert (FXNZ CHC)
I am looking forward to you changing the signature at the bottom of your emails. Regards, Robert Some days you are the pigeon, some days you are the statue. -Original Message- From: InfoHelp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 19 May 2004 1:43 p.m. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] S

Re: Gentoo + fest followup

2004-05-18 Thread InfoHelp
Fisher, Robert (FXNZ CHC) wrote: OK with me. BTW - how far have you got now Rik? 'Mr Systematic' is still filing & replying to relevant email.. Will yell out when I get Gentoo started again & want to run X (if startx doesn't work & the manual can't tell me why) - but at least I know Gentoo runs f

RE: Gentoo + fest followup

2004-05-18 Thread Fisher, Robert (FXNZ CHC)
OK with me. BTW - how far have you got now Rik? Regards, Robert Some days you are the pigeon, some days you are the statue. -Original Message- From: InfoHelp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 19 May 2004 1:27 p.m. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: Gentoo + fest

Re: Gentoo + fest followup

2004-05-18 Thread InfoHelp
Cheers Nick & Rob for your advices & suggestion for gleaning more, I'd like to take it up in this way: *Gentoo Installfest Followup Meeting* *Weds 30 June, Sydenham Community Centre Hall, 7.30pm* I will supply a few beers, as should everyone else wanting system assistance that evening. People wan

Re: hardware upgrade

2004-05-18 Thread Michael JasonSmith
On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 12:48, Christopher Sawtell wrote: > Hard drug dealers and computer vendors are the only industries which > refer to their clients as 'users'. Would "punters" be more appropiate :) -- Michael JasonSmith http://www.ldots.org/

Re: hardware upgrade

2004-05-18 Thread Christopher Sawtell
On Wednesday 19 May 2004 12:40, Vik Olliver wrote: > On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 10:54, Christopher Sawtell wrote: > > On Tuesday 18 May 2004 14:30, Dave G wrote: > > > 256Mb DDR Ram, > > > > We bought 512 Mb RAM because Caleb is into Blender rendering. > > Oh, woe. 'Tis a slippery slope, my good man. I

Re: hardware upgrade

2004-05-18 Thread Vik Olliver
On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 10:54, Christopher Sawtell wrote: > On Tuesday 18 May 2004 14:30, Dave G wrote: > > 256Mb DDR Ram, > We bought 512 Mb RAM because Caleb is into Blender rendering. Oh, woe. 'Tis a slippery slope, my good man. I am up to 1.5GiB - but I can give it up any time I want. Honest. V

Memetic decoration

2004-05-18 Thread Jim Cheetham
Whether you rate Tarantino's films or not, here's an interesting T-shirt ... http://www.splitreason.com/productdetail.php?id=99 The temptation to actually see the films is growing ... :-)

Re: ADSL Modem/Router Choices

2004-05-18 Thread Sascha Beaumont
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 John Carter wrote: | DSE ADSL Router was completely painless. It just worked. Must be why it's | going off the market... | I've got a DSE XH7916, which was superceeded by the XH1149. They're absolutely brilliant, and you're right they "just work". I use

Re: hardware upgrade

2004-05-18 Thread Christopher Sawtell
On Tuesday 18 May 2004 14:30, Dave G wrote: > Hi all > > I am currently looking at doing a bit of a box upgrade on this machine and > was wanting a few suggestions or recommendations. > > I have a fairly limited budget for this so I'll do the important stuff well > first, if I can, rather than the

RE: DOS emulator

2004-05-18 Thread Don Gould
actually I was just looking for you to tell me that we can't get win98 anymore so I could go back and tell the customer we should upgrade to Linux on those machines once we get the pos system working correctly. Don't you think there are enough machines out there with a mistake on them (including t

Re: DOS emulator

2004-05-18 Thread Nick Rout
there is a chch computer shop that advertises computers with no OS, and windows additional. In their addons there are various versions of windows offered, incl 98. I don't think you can get them direct from MS though, they may be buying them when boxes are traded in. http://pcu.co.nz/system_build

RE: DOS emulator

2004-05-18 Thread Don Gould
The application is single user. I was talking about the windows licenses before. Can you even buy Win98 licenses anymore? Cheers Don > -Original Message- > From: Williams, Olwen - SAL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 9:36 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE

Re: DOS emulator

2004-05-18 Thread Nick Rout
to my tired eyes that very helpful, small and entirely appropriate screenshot posted by Don only seemed to reveal 77 or 78 columns. Also (although its not possible to tell what it /should/ look like, it appears that the end of each line is spilling over onto the beginning of the next one, causing

RE: DOS emulator

2004-05-18 Thread Williams, Olwen - SAL
It will definitely expect 80x25. Incidentally there was an unlimited single-user runtime license available for A/Rev. Westpac used it for the DOS version of Deskbank, so don't be too sure about those licenses. I do hope this is single user, I'd be nervous about networks. I had problems on netwo

FW: Re: NZ trip

2004-05-18 Thread C. Falconer
Hey all - Mike Beattie sent me this. Pia Smith is the President of Linux Australia, and he's going to be in the country for a few days. Unfortunately I have no time to organise anything. Does someone want to arrange a communal geek lunch or dinner or something while he;s here? His blog is http:/

RE: ADSL Modem/Router Choices

2004-05-18 Thread Steve Bell
Got a D-Link 500, we've had it for about 3 years, and it's definately given 3 years worth of problems. Big phase of locking up the ADSL line, solved by firmware upgrades when available. It's latest trick is to lock up all the Network Neighborhoods (yes, winblows, a mix of 98, NT, and XP), so nobo

Re: console via usb

2004-05-18 Thread Dale Anderson
Theres a few kernel patches floating around for firewire (which is VERY neat for debugging) .. http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0203.3/0639.html for usb Cheers Dale. - Original Message - From: "Paul William" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CLUG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesda

Re: fsck of mounted partitions

2004-05-18 Thread steve
steve wrote: Christopher Sawtell wrote: On Tuesday 18 May 2004 14:05, Dale Anderson wrote: boot off the livecd and run fsck WITHOUT the partition mounted . This is vital, you court a real disaster if you attempt to fsck it mounted. Doing that will really ( euphemistically ) fsck it. Ther

Re: DOS emulator

2004-05-18 Thread Timothy Musson
Don Gould, 2004-05-18 16:13:51: > dosemu ... > My only problem now is that it's not displaying the window properly. > See the attached screen print. http://dosemu.sourceforge.net/docs/HOWTO/x348.html You might have to google for the fonts, if the documentation doesn't tell you where to find them.

Re: console via usb

2004-05-18 Thread Christopher Sawtell
On Tuesday 18 May 2004 18:52, Paul William wrote: > Hey all, > > Anyone know if you can get a 'Serial' Console using usb instead of a > serial port? I don't really care about having a console at boot up but > it would be a bonus. > > The only documentation I can find is about using the serial port.

Re: console via usb

2004-05-18 Thread Vik Olliver
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 18:52, Paul William wrote: > Hey all, > > Anyone know if you can get a 'Serial' Console using usb instead of a > serial port? I don't really care about having a console at boot up but > it would be a bonus. > > The only documentation I can find is about using the serial po

Re: Linux the Challenger

2004-05-18 Thread Vik Olliver
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 09:01, Robert Fisher wrote: > The Press - page C7 this morning has an article which paints Linux in a good light, > albeit referring mainly to Xandros. Just installed it at the Fire Station. Not bad - even installs without a mouse! Vik :v) -- This PC runs Linux. If you fin

Re: fsck of mounted partitions

2004-05-18 Thread Christopher Sawtell
On Tuesday 18 May 2004 19:04, steve wrote: > Same goes for XFS formatted systems, though I'm heartily sick of them > screwing up on me ): That very interesting, I have had only 2 very minor inexplicable mishaps in 2 years. There has been a steady stream of minor kernel patches, and I haven't had

Re: fsck of mounted partitions

2004-05-18 Thread steve
Christopher Sawtell wrote: On Tuesday 18 May 2004 14:05, Dale Anderson wrote: boot off the livecd and run fsck WITHOUT the partition mounted . This is vital, you court a real disaster if you attempt to fsck it mounted. Doing that will really ( euphemistically ) fsck it. There is a -check