On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 18:36, Steve Holdoway wrote:
>
> Try using the word 'defaults' as your option list. That's all you need.
> If mount /mnt/share works as a command line on its own, then you're sorted.
>
> Steve
/dev/sda4/mnt/share ext3 defaults,umask=000 0 0
Does not work either
Robert Fisher wrote:
Thanks Steve and Matthew, but I had tried that before (taking notail out)
my fstab now is as below but the problem is still here:-
/dev/sda1 /bootext3noauto,noatime 1 1
/dev/sda3 / reiserfsnotail,noatime 0 1
/dev/sda2 none
Thanks Steve and Matthew, but I had tried that before (taking notail out)
my fstab now is as below but the problem is still here:-
/dev/sda1 /bootext3noauto,noatime 1 1
/dev/sda3 / reiserfsnotail,noatime 0 1
/dev/sda2 none wapsw
[snip]
man mke2fs might help. notail is a reiser option, Didn't take long to
find the reason once the requested info arrived (:
... well it might, but man mount, using the ext2/ext3 sections might
help more. Brain in neutral again.
Steve
Steve
Robert Fisher wrote:
On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 17:31, Steve Holdoway wrote:
No, don't change any of there. However, I think *everybody* would be
happier if you posted the output from either mount or df.
Cheers,
Steve
As you can see below, mount and df show that sda4 is not mounted until I type
mo
At 2004-10-02T17:52:33+1200, Robert Fisher wrote:
> As you can see below, mount and df show that sda4 is not mounted until
> I type mount /dev/sda4 /mnt/share/
> ...so WHY can't I have a line like mine in fstab?
> /dev/sda4/mnt/share ext3 notail,noatime,umask=000 0 0
Because the notail optio
On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 17:31, Steve Holdoway wrote:
> No, don't change any of there. However, I think *everybody* would be
> happier if you posted the output from either mount or df.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Steve
As you can see below, mount and df show that sda4 is not mounted until I type
mount /dev/sda4 /
On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 17:21, Robert Fisher wrote:
No, I think those settings are fine, but I find the built-in config file so
very useful so I'd set this one too:-
CONFIG_IKCONFIG=y
thats
make menuconfig
General setup ---> Kernel .config support *
One can then be absolutely certain that what is
OK here it is. Do you think any of these need changing?
beast linux # cat /usr/src/linux/.config | egrep -i 'reiser|ext3'
CONFIG_EXT3_FS=y
CONFIG_EXT3_FS_XATTR=y
# CONFIG_EXT3_FS_POSIX_ACL is not set
# CONFIG_EXT3_FS_SECURITY is not set
CONFIG_REISERFS_FS=y
# CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK is not set
# CON
Robert Fisher wrote:
On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 13:10, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ zcat /proc/config.gz | egrep -i 'reiser|ext3'
# CONFIG_EXT3_FS is not set
CONFIG_REISERFS_FS=y
# CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK is not set
CONFIG_REISERFS_PROC_INFO=y
# CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_XATTR is not set
Sin
On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 13:14, Nick Rout wrote:
> other ways to diagnose this would be:
>
> umount /dev/sda4 and see if the files are stll there on the mount point;
> or
> try mounting /dev/sda4 elsewhere in the filesystem and see whats there.
Yes I can confirm now that the files are in /mnt/share bu
On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 13:10, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ zcat /proc/config.gz | egrep -i 'reiser|ext3'
> # CONFIG_EXT3_FS is not set
> CONFIG_REISERFS_FS=y
> # CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK is not set
> CONFIG_REISERFS_PROC_INFO=y
> # CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_XATTR is not set
>
> Sincerely
Hi guys
I have IPCOP 1.4 installed and booted up.
It took me about 15 minutes to setup as nick indicated .
Nice new interface and features.
I downloaded it last night over bittorrent. Took about 5 hours.
Best of all it goes ok on my 1000mhz machine with 48megs of ram and 33k
modem
Brendan Greer
On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 12:59:01 +1200, Christopher Sawtell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Be sure to check that you have either got the kernel module for the filesystem
> loaded, or the driver compiled into the kernel?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ zcat /proc/config.gz | egrep -i 'reiser|ext3'
> # CONFIG_E
On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 11:31:36 +1200
Gareth Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Um, can I ask how you know it's working? Could you please do the
> following commands directly after boot and post the output:
>
> # df
> # mount /dev/sda4 /home/share
> # df
>
> I have my suspicions that it isn't m
On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 11:31, Gareth Williams wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 10:38:30 +1200, Robert Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 10:20, Gareth Williams wrote:
> > > I am not suggesting that it is a faulty disk. I am interested to know
> > > if you can actually mount /dev/sda
On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 10:26, Andrew Errington wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 16:31, you wrote:
> > Thanks Chris - I am not sure about the number of serial devices -
> > probably not in reality, it is just that I have always used ttyS4 for
> > this particular modem (suggested in the setup notes and the
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 10:38:30 +1200, Robert Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 10:20, Gareth Williams wrote:
>
> > I am not suggesting that it is a faulty disk. I am interested to know
> > if you can actually mount /dev/sda4, that is all. The errors above
> > look like fatal err
Wahoo. Thank you Nick :-) I'm grabbing the torrent right now...
On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 16:31, you wrote:
> Thanks Chris - I am not sure about the number of serial devices -
> probably not in reality, it is just that I have always used ttyS4 for
> this particular modem (suggested in the setup notes and the only one that
> seems to work).
My laptop has one serial p
subject says it all, but I'll include the full announcement which has
the download sites.
A word of advice, the sourceforge mirrors take a long time to sync,I am
downloading using the bittorrent (see below)
[forwarded from a message from Alan Hourihane on ipcop-devel]
IPCop users, and developers
Robert Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Everything seems to work even though I get the error message
.
.
.
> beast root # mount -t ext3 -o sb=16 /dev/sda4 /mnt/share/
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda4,
>or too many mounted file systems
> beast root # moun
On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 08:28, Steve Holdoway wrote:
> Ok, it's ext3. So, if you try mount -t ext3 -o sb=16 /dev/dsa4 /mnt does
> it mount cleanly? If not try with 32 in place of 16. If it does, then
> your superblock is corrupt, and the best thing to do is to tar
> everything off it, reformat it using
Robert Fisher wrote:
A better explanation and answers to your questions can be found at
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=230932&highlight=
On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 20:53, Steve Holdoway wrote:
Robert,
Do you mean /dev/sda..., rather that /devsda...
I take it that you're mounting either a scsi
A better explanation and answers to your questions can be found at
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=230932&highlight=
On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 20:53, Steve Holdoway wrote:
> Robert,
>
> Do you mean /dev/sda..., rather that /devsda...
>
> I take it that you're mounting either a scsi ior usb driv
Zane Gilmore wrote:
Just recently I tried to reboot my machine at home:
a Mandrake 10.0 box running a 2.4 kernel
(so my Ihug Ultra thingie will work.)
First of all I got problems with the hard disk partitions not being
recognised.
So I then changed my fstab to point at /dev/ide/target0
instea
Robert Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /devsda4 or too many
> mounted filesystems"
The first place you want to look is /etc/fstab. You might have a
broken entry in there.. ?
Also, I noticed in the quote above, it's called "/devsda4" - I
Robert Fisher wrote:
Dam. I meant to send this to work to google later.
Oh well, you have it now.
/devsda1 = ext3 = /boot
/devsda2 = swap
/devsda3 = reiserfs = /
/devsda4 = ext3 = /mnt/share
I have tried both reiser and ext3 on /devsda4
Everything seems to work even though I get the error message.
At 2004-10-01T19:25:17+1200, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> Quoting the Gentoo install manual:-
> "ReiserFS is a B*-tree based filesystem that has very good overall
> performance and greatly outperforms both ext2 and ext3 when dealing
> with small files (files less than 4k), often by a factor of 10x
On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 18:26, Matthew Gregan wrote:
> At 2004-10-01T17:43:08+1200, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> > On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 17:16, Rik Tindall wrote:
> > > Ext3 of course!! :-)
> >
> > Not necessarily so. Only if you want to sacrifice speed ( lots ) on
> > the virtual altar of reliability.
30 matches
Mail list logo
