Many moons ago it was "peripheral interchange program" the copy command on
cpm
-Original Message-
From: Nick Rout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 18 July 2006 11:29 a.m.
To: linux-users@it.canterbury.ac.nz
Subject: Re: CLUG web server changes
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:18:18 +1200
Don Gould wrote:
or just update the pip[e] capacity until it's just not an issue anymore,
My 2c:
No matter how big you make the pipes, they're still a *finite*
resource and there will always be content pedlers pushing
high-bandwidth "content" to use it all up.
There will also always be bottlen
Jim Cheetham wrote:
However, I think we've already established that no-one here has enough
interest or experience of clarke connect to be able to offer meaningful
help.
Agreed. I'm currently trying to learn enough about debian 3.1 so I can
just replace cc.
I've got a new server in place b
Um, regardless of whether you CAN increase the pipe or not, that isn't
the point.
After all, the problem is that the misbehaving app/person is flooding a
slow link - what prevents them from doing the same to your faster link
that you've just paid extra money for?
As Volker put it, bandwidth manag
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 01:30:02PM +1200, Don Gould wrote:
> I was saying that people need to stop worrying about what google is up
> to and just put in a bigger pipe. As the discussion is about hosting
> then it's right no.
It's not primarily a Linux-related issue, but people running servers a
What makes me dismiss this McAfee fella is that he seems to consider
security by obscurity a valid concept.
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Holdoway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 18 July 2006 7:57 a.m.
> To: linux-users@it.canterbury.ac.nz
> Subject: FL/OSS must be hurting
ROFL!
Following your rant about the fact I left out an e in my word, you then
come back and rant about the fact that my Linux server dropped the word
SPAM in the subject line because it thought the content was spam...
My response to orginal message was on topic...
I was saying that people ne
Don't you remember your CP/M?
Peripheral Interchange Program
Steve
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:59:33 +1200
Rex Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nick Rout wrote:
>
> > I have two clues - my TV has PIP capacity, = picture in picture.
>
> Plastic Irrigation Pipe?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wi
Don, putting the tag "SPAM" in your subject line does not excuse a
meaningless post.
Or even two meaningless posts in a row.
Can I remind people that this list is primarily about GNU/Linux and
software that runs under GNU/Linux . Secondarily it covers general FLOSS
issues and other free/open unix
+e
Nick Rout wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:18:18 +1200
Don Gould wrote:
or just update the pip capacity until it's just not an issue anymore,
remember it's also impacting on their systems.
Cheers Don
pardon my ignorance, what is the "pip capacity"
--
Don Gould
www.thinkdesignprint.co.n
Nick Rout wrote:
I have two clues - my TV has PIP capacity, = picture in picture.
Plastic Irrigation Pipe?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PIP
has a few interesting entries, none of which seem to to fit.
I have a dog called Pip, and as a result of the little white hairs that
appear on every it
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:40:04 +1200
Rex Johnston wrote:
> Nick Rout wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:18:18 +1200
> > Don Gould wrote:
> >
> >> or just update the pip capacity until it's just not an issue anymore,
> >> remember it's also impacting on their systems.
> >>
> >> Cheers Don
> >
> >
> or just update the pip capacity until it's just not an issue anymore,
> remember it's also impacting on their systems.
pip what?
And are you suggesting I take on google to see who has more bandwidth,
and the pockets to pay for it? Fingers crossed my mental state doesn't
evaporate that much bef
Nick Rout wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:18:18 +1200
Don Gould wrote:
or just update the pip capacity until it's just not an issue anymore,
remember it's also impacting on their systems.
Cheers Don
pardon my ignorance, what is the "pip capacity"
Don't you know anything Nick? It's how big
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:18:18 +1200
Don Gould wrote:
> or just update the pip capacity until it's just not an issue anymore,
> remember it's also impacting on their systems.
>
> Cheers Don
pardon my ignorance, what is the "pip capacity"
--
Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
or just update the pip capacity until it's just not an issue anymore,
remember it's also impacting on their systems.
Cheers Don
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
It's often interesting looking over stats...
Not really, unless you have an actual need to do so. Either you need to
monitor bandwidth (in whi
> > It's often interesting looking over stats...
>
> Not really, unless you have an actual need to do so. Either you need to
> monitor bandwidth (in which case you should be measuring from the
> network, not from the app), or you are actively changing the design of
> your sites to match the people
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:56:02PM +1200, Don Gould wrote:
> It's often interesting looking over stats...
Not really, unless you have an actual need to do so. Either you need to
monitor bandwidth (in which case you should be measuring from the
network, not from the app), or you are actively changi
Apparently botnets are our fault now! They're even using CVS. I'd have thought
subversion would be a better option (:
http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/index.cfm?newsid=6601
Steve
It's often interesting looking over stats...
http://www.tcn.bowenvale.co.nz/stats/ - updates everyday...
Peter Harrison from NZOSS posted an article earlier about FF saying it
was getting 14% now...
If you look at my site you'll see that I get much higher than that, thou
it's likly because i
I've recently run the wiki web logs through awstats; please see:-
http://clug.net.nz/stats/awstats.clug.2006.html
http://clug.net.nz/stats/awstats.clug.2005.html
http://clug.net.nz/stats/awstats.clug.2004.html
Basically, current traffic usage is 60MB/month for people, and about
500Mb/month for ro
21 matches
Mail list logo
