From:
http://gmail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=10350&rand=0.7281862748377025
"POP access is free for all Gmail users and we have no plans to charge."
Nick Rout wrote:
yes, now the word is on the gentoo list that once gmail stops being beta,
that pop will cost $, as the ads can't come
> I own a couple of domains, and I can rely on that level of ownership ...
> until ICANN go private and pimp the whole registry to the corruption
> that currently exists. If I miss a renewal date, I'll loose the domain
> to a squatter (or Verisign, same thing) within about 3 picoseconds, and
>
04 16:21:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.54.53.30 with SMTP id b30mr113702wra; Thu,
18 Nov 2004 16:21:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.54.46.16 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:21:55 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 13:21:55 +1300
From: Matthew Gregan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Did you
Nope - I hit reply and get a blank To field
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Gregan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 19 November 2004 1:22 p.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Did you guys know that gmail is fetchable with pop?
This message will have an empty Reply-To
At 2004-11-19T12:48:08+1300, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> Has it still got the Reply-To: sillyness?
There's still no way to explicitly disable the addition of a Reply-To:
header from messages originating from Gmail.
This message will have an empty Reply-To: (which is almost definitely
not RFC 28
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:30, Nick Rout wrote:
> yes, now the word is on the gentoo list that once gmail stops
http://www.cups.org/ghostscript.phpbeing beta,
> that pop will cost $, as the ads can't come with the pop messages.
Quoting the POP mail help/information page:-
"POP access is free for all G
Got my mailbox down, but I'm currently seeing a new (text) mail on the
web interface that isn't coming through on the pop interface yet ...
Also, the sent items don't appear in the Inbox by default, they go to
Sent Items (probably), you might want to change that to duplicate the
effect of Inbox
Well, there isn't anything left in the world you can rely on ...
If you use a "free" service, you can expect it to charge/advertise-to
you as soon as you become reliant on it ...
I own a couple of domains, and I can rely on that level of ownership ...
until ICANN go private and pimp the whole re
yes, now the word is on the gentoo list that once gmail stops being beta,
that pop will cost $, as the ads can't come with the pop messages.
not that i am a rumour monger or anything LOL
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:28:28 +1300
Jim Cheetham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep, new experimental feature,
Yep, new experimental feature, as of last week not rolled out to all
user accounts. Help text says that if you have a "new features!" link on
your inbox, you can go for it :-)
It wasn't enabled for me last week, so I didn't try ... looks like it is
now, so I suspect the rollout is proceeding we
Or am I just slow!
over ssl too, so no passwords visible to sniffers. (not sure if that is
just for authentication or the whole transaction)
--
Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11 matches
Mail list logo
