dard web pages you needed
> to work with HTML directly, ethier user notepad or one of the many html
> editors that are available, editors like Dreamweaver produce non standard
> code it is better to code your page yourself then you can have more control
> on the page design
>
>
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 17:49, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> OK. It was a labour of love for my English relatives, none the less I'm
> quite proud of it.
Sorry youngsters, had a senior moment.
http://berty.dyndns.org/wedding/
--
Sincerely etc.,
Christopher Sawtell
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 16:18, Yuri de Groot wrote:
> And I know this is waaay OT, but why not post the url of your favourite
> page (designed by yourself) be it code or dreamweaver, and we shall see
> which pages a) look the nicest (by far the most important factor to joe
> citizen
>And I know this is waaay OT, but why not post the url of your favourite page
>(designed by yourself) be it code or dreamweaver, and we shall see which
>pages a) look the nicest (by far the most important factor to joe citizen
>IMHO), and b) have the tidiest HTML.
http://home.clear.
> www.crconline.org
>
> Probably full of errors, but I think it looks nice.
Not in Konqueror it doesn't :)
Even in Mozilla (1.0) I get a little piece of broken image on the right (and a
pop up window, argh!). But in konq (3.0.2) I don't get any of the animation
(I'm guessing it's using somethi
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Damien Bateman wrote:
>
> > It will be a long while before Linux comes
> > up with anything that can compete with Microsoft's Active Directory, its
> > an awesome product, and if you get over your negative diatribe, and
> > learn a bit about it, you too will find that MS has
> It will be a long while before Linux comes
> up with anything that can compete with Microsoft's Active Directory, its
> an awesome product, and if you get over your negative diatribe, and
> learn a bit about it, you too will find that MS has a lot to offer.
Active Directory? Oh you mean the com
My understanding was in order to create high standard web pages you needed to work
with HTML directly, ethier user notepad or one of the many html editors that are
available, editors like Dreamweaver produce non standard code it is better to code
your page yourself then you can have more
L with notepad. Even today I still use notepad to
> create my basic page, and then use Dreamweaver to add the tricky stuff
> later. I use Adobe Photoshop to create buttons, ImageReady to make
them
> roll-overs, and then use Dreamweaver to add the Java scripted buttons
to
> my standard p
the blind/visually impaired?
Just my 0.00c [swedish rounding]
John Blance
Technical Architect
Canterbury District Health Board
Direct Dial: 03 3640707
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/30/03 09:16 AM >>>
Just to put in my 2c worth, I have used Dreamweaver for several
ver
> roll-overs, and then use Dreamweaver to add the Java scripted buttons to
> my standard page.
Yeah, some idiots need java to get past their front page, because all
the navigation requires it. Even the average Microsoftie knows by know
that downloading programs from any odd website and r
Steve Bell wrote:
Just to put in my 2c worth, I have used Dreamweaver for several versions.
And in the midst of a list of programmers, gurus, and geeks, I'm taking a
risk saying this ('specially with a lynching mob on the loose), but I *hate*
code.
Dreamweaver is supposedly
Just to put in my 2c worth, I have used Dreamweaver for several versions.
And in the midst of a list of programmers, gurus, and geeks, I'm taking a
risk saying this ('specially with a lynching mob on the loose), but I *hate*
code. I can work it out basically when I HAVE to.
And I kn
Aha! Our first MS troll - time to organise a lynching mob? ;-)
(relax, I'm joking)
Gareth
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 23:17, DSA wrote:
> I too learned HTML with notepad. Even today I still use notepad to
> create my basic page, and then use Dreamweaver to add the tricky stuff
>
I too learned HTML with
notepad. Even today I still use notepad to create my basic page, and then use Dreamweaver
to add the tricky stuff later. I use Adobe Photoshop to create buttons,
ImageReady to make them roll-overs, and then use Dreamweaver to add the Java
scripted buttons to my
For all your experience, I think you meant "Macromedia" products, not
Adobe
And yes they are great tools for amateurs but produce decidedly non
standard HTML.
DSA wrote:
Hey guys,
I think youll find Dreamweaver was designed for Apple MAC, and has
only recently been adapted f
DSA wrote:
> Hey guys,
> I think you'll find Dreamweaver was designed for Apple MAC, and has only
> recently been adapted for Windows.
Yes, its dual-platform. A Linux version would be nice.
> In case you're wondering, Dreamweaver, even in the Windows
> configuration,
hmm sorry about doing top up but i can't get rid of
that annoying bar when appending stuff unless I do.
I used to find Dreamweaver really good... I
couldn't tell you what version it was but it was before MX, but I have tried
using MX a couple of times and really didn't li
Hey guys,
I think you’ll find
Dreamweaver was designed for Apple MAC, and has only recently been adapted for
Windows.
In case you’re
wondering, Dreamweaver, even in the Windows configuration, is an excellent tool
for Web development, and in conjunction with the other Adobe products
Dreamweaver MX will probably not work (being "new" and all, there's
probably something in there that Wine will cry out about..), but maybe
there is a hope with Dreamweaver 3 or 4.
On a side note, I once managed to get the Trial version of Flash 3 to
work (very slowly), but
I agree, has anyone managaed to use DreamWeaver with Wine?
21 matches
Mail list logo
