> I'm not against progress, and I don't think any of us are. But I'm not
> a big fan of big flashy neon lights in my email. I'd rather have the
> speedy pace of text. I read my mail over a secure shell connection to
> North America. I don't want to wait for images and pointless markup
> when al
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 16:23, Steve Bell wrote:
> Just as an aside, two thoughts... browning>
>
> Are not most geeks on broadband now... Well, a majority of you anyway?
Er, probably not. Broadband by ITU definition is 384Kb/s and up. I don't
think Jetstream Games counts ...
Now I'm finally out
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 04:23:02PM NZDT, Steve Bell wrote:
> Just as an aside, two thoughts... browning>
Fair enough. I find a little garlic goes nicely, too.
> Are not most geeks on broadband now... Well, a majority of you anyway?
There's more dialup than you might think. Even still, bandw
Yeah, and plenty of em attach a 2 line Word Document instead of
including the text IN the email too. Should we join that trend too?? =)
Steve Bell wrote:
You will get on much better on most
mailing lists (espec linux ones), your messages will be shorter so you
will save bandwidth.
Just as a
> You will get on much better on most
> mailing lists (espec linux ones), your messages will be shorter so you
> will save bandwidth.
Just as an aside, two thoughts...
Are not most geeks on broadband now... Well, a majority of you anyway?
And, Linux is purporting itself to become a viable des
