Col wrote:
> That would make it easy! I tried
>
> echo $4
>
> but it displayed nothing (redhat 8)
The script needs to be executable, and the first line needs to contain a
path to the interpreter. Also I am not sure what it does with standard
output so it may be a good idea to redirect that t
On Sat, 01 Feb 2003 15:14, Col wrote:
> Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 18:01, Col wrote:
> >>Is there an easier/better way for a user to obtain ppp0 ip address than
> >>
> >>IP=$(netstat -rn | grep UH | cut -d" " -f1 | head -n 1)
> >
> > Quoting the pppd man page
> >
> > /etc/pp
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 18:01, Col wrote:
Is there an easier/better way for a user to obtain ppp0 ip address than
IP=$(netstat -rn | grep UH | cut -d" " -f1 | head -n 1)
Quoting the pppd man page
/etc/ppp/ip-up
A program or script which is executed when
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 04:19:11PM +1300, Michael JasonSmith wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 16:12, Carl Cerecke wrote:
> > Anybody have any Linux questions?
> GNOME or KDE?
what happened to:
emacs or vi?
greetings, martin.
--
interested in doing pike programming, sTeam/caudium/pike/roxen trainin
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 14:12, Nick Rout wrote:
> For heavens sake John, if you read the list properly you would know that
> the people on this list (ie "CLUG" to the extent that it exists) don't
> feel the need for anything more formal than we now have. What
> unfulfilled need are you trying to addr
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 18:01, Col wrote:
> Is there an easier/better way for a user to obtain ppp0 ip address than
>
> IP=$(netstat -rn | grep UH | cut -d" " -f1 | head -n 1)
Quoting the pppd man page
/etc/ppp/ip-up
A program or script which is executed when the link
is
I completely agree.
On Friday 31 Jan 2003 5:19 am, Robert Fisher wrote:
> Thanks Nick.
>
> Here here!
>
> On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 14:12, Nick Rout wrote:
> > For heavens sake John, if you read the list properly you would know that
> > the people on this list (ie "CLUG" to the extent that it exists)
Col wrote:
I have one ( trying to learn bash scripting )
Is there an easier/better way for a user to obtain ppp0 ip address than
IP=$(netstat -rn | grep UH | cut -d" " -f1 | head -n 1)
IP=$(netstat -rn | grep UH | awk '{print $1}')
Adrian
Thanks Nick.
Here here!
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 14:12, Nick Rout wrote:
> For heavens sake John, if you read the list properly you would know that
> the people on this list (ie "CLUG" to the extent that it exists) don't
> feel the need for anything more formal than we now have. What
> unfulfilled n
Carl Cerecke wrote:
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
Personally, I have got neither the time nor the emotional energy to get
involved with either a strictured, or a structured organisation. I'll
just
have to walk away from it if that happens. I hope not.
Funnily enough, the 5 people "elected" to th
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 16:29, Carl Cerecke wrote:
> Michael JasonSmith wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 16:12, Carl Cerecke wrote:
> > >Anybody have any Linux questions?
> > GNOME or KDE?
> For you, Michael, twm.
socks:~# ps auxw | grep twm
criggie 763 0.0 0.1 3228 1464 ?SJan30
Michael JasonSmith wrote:
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 16:12, Carl Cerecke wrote:
Anybody have any Linux questions?
GNOME or KDE?
For you, Michael, twm.
Cheers,
Carl.
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 16:12, Carl Cerecke wrote:
> Anybody have any Linux questions?
GNOME or KDE?
:-P
--
Michael JasonSmith http://www.cosc.canterbury.ac.nz/~mpj17/
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
Personally, I have got neither the time nor the emotional energy to get
involved with either a strictured, or a structured organisation. I'll just
have to walk away from it if that happens. I hope not.
Funnily enough, the 5 people "elected" to the committee probably h
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 13:52, John S Veitch wrote:
> Nick Elder :
> "I MOVE THAT THE CLUG MEETING THIS COMING WEDNESDAY BE A GENERAL
> MEETING AND THAT AT THIS MEETING WE FORM AN EXECUTIVE !"
>
> Christopher Sawtell:
> "I second that!"
While I did indeed write that, I want to make it perfectly clear
John wrote:
> There should be nothing controversial in the above suggestion. All
> the "power" of the Executive Committee is in the hands of the five
> people already appointed who group members already know, respect and
> trust. Since we are doing some new things it might be beneficial to
>
For heavens sake John, if you read the list properly you would know that
the people on this list (ie "CLUG" to the extent that it exists) don't
feel the need for anything more formal than we now have. What
unfulfilled need are you trying to address, apart from a (perceived)
need for structure?
The
17 matches
Mail list logo
