As Nick said qemu is damn slow , but then again it is basically a fork
of bochs with a few extras added to aid initial setup and configuration.
Cheers
Dale.
On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 14:02 +1300, Nick Rout wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 13:04 +1300, Nick Rout wrote:
> > have you tried it? I see it is
On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 13:04 +1300, Nick Rout wrote:
> have you tried it? I see it is in portage.
>
> hint you need softmmu in your USE variable.
>
> I'll report after lunch.
>
> On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 12:13 +1300, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> > Greets,
> >
> > Folks who are interested in this
have you tried it? I see it is in portage.
hint you need softmmu in your USE variable.
I'll report after lunch.
On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 12:13 +1300, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> Greets,
>
> Folks who are interested in this thread may also be interested to read
> about
> another Free emulator
Greets,
Folks who are interested in this thread may also be interested to read about
another Free emulator which has been released.
http://www.linux-magazine.com/issue/52/QEMU_System_Emulation.pdf
Take care, it's 334 kB but well worth the read imho.
--
Sincerely etc.,
Christopher Sawtell
Someone wrote:
What's happening about this?
Are we anywhere in the running?
6 pm Sunday
I just registered for something, although
(a) it wouldn't accept my email address ("already registered") and I had
to supply another, and
(b) at no stage did it ask me what LUG I was claiming to be President
o
No further correspondence thus far , have been on holiday this week ,
will follow up early next week and see what is happening .
Cheers
Dale.
On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 22:29 +1300, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:18, Dale Anderson wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> > Not sure if anyone is i
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:18, Dale Anderson wrote:
> Hi All
>
> Not sure if anyone is interested or not
> http://www.vmware.com/lugprex/lugPrez_login.jsp
What's happening about this?
Are we anywhere in the running?
--
Sincerely etc.,
Christopher Sawtell
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
Nick Rout wrote:
dare i say "get a new distro"
Often worth a try.
All routes to maximised computer functionality worth knowing about, but..
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:26, Steve Holdoway wrote:
...not really. If you're suggesting that Debian is lacking in some way,
then
To: linux-users@it.canterbury.ac.nz
Subject: Re: Vmware any-any patch, was RE: VMWARE LUG offer ..
Looks like it's working better so far, thanks. But where's this patch come
from? I can't find a thing on the vmware.com site about it.
Cheers,
Steve
On Thu, January 27, 2005
ginal Message-
> From: Steve Holdoway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 26 January 2005 5:10 p.m.
> To: linux-users@it.canterbury.ac.nz
> Subject: Re: VMWARE LUG offer ..
>
>
> I don't know if this has been pointed out, but...
>
> It doesn'
oddle to apply.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Holdoway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 January 2005 5:10 p.m.
To: linux-users@it.canterbury.ac.nz
Subject: Re: VMWARE LUG offer ..
I don't know if this has been pointed out, but...
It doesn't run properly on
Works/ed fine for me , 4.0+ on debian,ubuntu, gentoo , self rolled ,
hell it even worked on SuSe ;) (oh SUSE since novell merge) iirc .
Cheers
Dale.
On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 17:10 +1300, Steve Holdoway wrote:
> Dale Anderson wrote:
>
> >Hi All
> >
> >Not sure if anyone is interested or not
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:26, Steve Holdoway wrote:
Nick Rout wrote:
4.5.2 works fine on my gentoo system with every kernel i've ever used,
from 2.4 series through to the current 2.6.10
4.5.2-8848 is what I am no longer using (:
sam
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:26, Steve Holdoway wrote:
> Nick Rout wrote:
> >>>4.5.2 works fine on my gentoo system with every kernel i've ever used,
> >>>from 2.4 series through to the current 2.6.10
> >>4.5.2-8848 is what I am no longer using (:
> >
> >same here actually .
> >
> >dare i say "get a ne
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:20, Nick Rout wrote:
> > >4.5.2 works fine on my gentoo system with every kernel i've ever used,
> > >from 2.4 series through to the current 2.6.10
> > >
> > >>Steve
> >
> > 4.5.2-8848 is what I am no longer using (:
>
> same here actually .
>
> dare i say "get a new distro"
Nick Rout wrote:
4.5.2 works fine on my gentoo system with every kernel i've ever used,
from 2.4 series through to the current 2.6.10
Steve
4.5.2-8848 is what I am no longer using (:
same here actually .
dare i say "get a new distro"
Steve
.
> >
> >4.5.2 works fine on my gentoo system with every kernel i've ever used,
> >from 2.4 series through to the current 2.6.10
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>Steve
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> 4.5.2-8848 is what I am no longer using (:
same here actually .
dare i say "get a new distro"
>
> Steve
Nick Rout wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:10:05 +1300
Steve Holdoway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dale Anderson wrote:
Hi All
Not sure if anyone is interested or not
http://www.vmware.com/lugprex/lugPrez_login.jsp
Cheers
Dale.
I don't know if this has been pointed out, but...
It
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:10:05 +1300
Steve Holdoway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dale Anderson wrote:
>
> >Hi All
> >
> >Not sure if anyone is interested or not
> >http://www.vmware.com/lugprex/lugPrez_login.jsp
> >
> >Cheers
> >Dale.
> >
> >
> >
> I don't know if this has been pointed out
Dale Anderson wrote:
Hi All
Not sure if anyone is interested or not
http://www.vmware.com/lugprex/lugPrez_login.jsp
Cheers
Dale.
I don't know if this has been pointed out, but...
It doesn't run properly on any up-to-date kernel. That's debian with
2.6.8 or 2.6.9, FC2 or FC3 with 2.6.10 (
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 18:03, Hadley Rich wrote:
> I am using v5 beta[1] at the moment. Seems to be working fine from
> the little I have played with it. I can't seem to find anywhere a
> time limit on the beta versions license. If it doesn't run out it
> could be handy.
It does.
hads
--
To A Quic
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:44, Andy George wrote:
Dale Anderson wrote:
Hi All
Not sure if anyone is interested or not
http://www.vmware.com/lugprex/lugPrez_login.jsp
Cheers
Dale.
Dont wanna keep one, but I could certainly borrow one until I get bored
with
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
I beg to differ. Pres can say "I told every subscriber of
http://", and vmware can spam that...
Volker
Ah. Um. Thanks. My clock's wrong, too.
Ken
anuary 17, 2005 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: VMWARE LUG offer ..
> here are the terms & conditions.
>
> http://www.vmware.com/pdf/lug_terms_conditions.pdf
>
> i posted the EULA a day or so ago.
>
> frankly i don't care who registers as president of our lug and receives
&
> ** It's true that the last sentence doesn't say "all addresses." But
> when they ask, in terms of Condition So-and-so, "Whom have you told
> about us?" the only practical way our Presidential Nominee can reply is
> by making available the complete LUG address list.
I beg to differ. Pres can
Nick Rout wrote:... heres the text:
In consideration VMware asks that
each Linux Group President inform his or her colleagues, associates
and Linux user group members of the benefits that he or she receives
from using VMware products.
a Linux User Group President must submit the Linux
User G
I'll put my hand up for a copy if there is one spare, I would prefer win4lin,
but beggars and all that.
lance
-Original Message-
From: david merriman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:33:44 +1300
To: linux-users@it.canterbury.ac.nz
Subject: Re: VMWAR
reads distinctly like a pyramid marketing scheme
Nick Rout wrote:
6. A Linux User Group President may not transfer the Product license provided
in connection with this Program to any other person or entity.
7. The first One Thousand (1,000) Linux User Group Members to complete a valid on-line regi
On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 12:01, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> As I understood, a further 5 LUG members can also get a free license. So
> far, fewer than that have shown interest.
I'll definitely have a copy if there's any left. :)
> frankly i don't care who registers as president of our lug and receives
> a free license. however as there is a considerable benefit in terms of
> license fees, i suggest a consensus would be nice.
As I understood, a further 5 LUG members can also get a free license. So
far, fewer than that have
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 11:03, Dale Anderson wrote:
> Im already registered , ill find out the furthur terms and conditions of
> the licence and take it from there .
I'd like a copy please, if that's possible?
VMware burble on about being a group registered on either the linux counter:-
http://counte
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:43:46 +1300
Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> here are the terms & conditions.
>
> http://www.vmware.com/pdf/lug_terms_conditions.pdf
bugger it access to that doc may depend on going through the hoops of
the previous pages, heres the text: (sorry i do not have time
here are the terms & conditions.
http://www.vmware.com/pdf/lug_terms_conditions.pdf
i posted the EULA a day or so ago.
frankly i don't care who registers as president of our lug and receives
a free license. however as there is a considerable benefit in terms of
license fees, i suggest a consens
Dale Anderson wrote:
Hi All
Not sure if anyone is interested or not
http://www.vmware.com/lugprex/lugPrez_login.jsp
Cheers
Dale.
I'd be interested in a copy too.
David
--
The pen is mightier than the sword, but only if the sword is very small and the
pen is very sharp
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 10:53:23 +1300
Christopher Sawtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:44, Andy George wrote:
> > Dale Anderson wrote:
> > >Hi All
> > >
> > >Not sure if anyone is interested or not
> > >http://www.vmware.com/lugprex/lugPrez_login.jsp
> > >
> > >Cheers
> >
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:44, Andy George wrote:
> Dale Anderson wrote:
> >Hi All
> >
> >Not sure if anyone is interested or not
> >http://www.vmware.com/lugprex/lugPrez_login.jsp
> >
> >Cheers
> >Dale.
>
> Dont wanna keep one, but I could certainly borrow one until I get bored
> with it...
>
> I
On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 00:27 +1300, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> > Win4Lin have a similar offer
> >
> > http://www.netraverse.com/LUG/
>
> I'd be interested here too, the price is certainly much more reasonable.
> In the past however win4lin had a number of drawbacks affecting its
> usefulness:
I purc
here is the license (according to /usr/portage/licenses/vmware)
On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 11:03 +1300, Dale Anderson wrote:
> Im already registered , ill find out the furthur terms and conditions of
> the licence and take it from there .
>
> Cheers
> Dale.
>
> On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 10:45 +1300, N
hi
I´m keen for a copy
Was playing around with an evaluation copy but that ran out a few months
ago.
I could probably offer some comments
Brendan Greer
Im already registered , ill find out the furthur terms and conditions of
the licence and take it from there .
Cheers
Dale.
On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 10:45 +1300, Nick Rout wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 09:50 +1300, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> > > I'm happy to go ahead and organise it ...I guess the ma
On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 09:50 +1300, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> > I'm happy to go ahead and organise it ...I guess the main issue is am I
> > going to stand on somebodies toes if I do so ?
>
> No, and anyone with sensitive toes has time to speak up now or forever
> hold their breath.
>
> > Is there
> I'm happy to go ahead and organise it ...I guess the main issue is am I
> going to stand on somebodies toes if I do so ?
No, and anyone with sensitive toes has time to speak up now or forever
hold their breath.
> Is there a 'president' of CLUG pursue ?
There is a committee for organising the
> Actually on further inspection it may not be a good tip after all.
Apart from being a pull-everyone-over-the-table license, it doesn't
allow the user to use the beta for anything useful. Difficult to police
though until you go public with your new product developed on the beta.
> So they may we
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 23:50, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> Good tip, but have you actually read the utterly obnoxious license?
Actually on further inspection it may not be a good tip after all.
From the license:
>Licensee's rights with respect to
>the Beta Software will terminate upon the earlier of (a
> Win4Lin have a similar offer
>
> http://www.netraverse.com/LUG/
I'd be interested here too, the price is certainly much more reasonable.
In the past however win4lin had a number of drawbacks affecting its
usefulness:
Kernel patch required. Effect on stability? It's not likely to be
uptodate wit
Dale Anderson wrote:
Hi All
Not sure if anyone is interested or not
http://www.vmware.com/lugprex/lugPrez_login.jsp
Cheers
Dale.
Dont wanna keep one, but I could certainly borrow one until I get bored
with it...
I wouldnt mind a turn with one of the copies...
--
No virus found in this o
> [1]http://www.vmware.com/products/desktop/ws5_beta.html
Good tip, but have you actually read the utterly obnoxious license?
Volker
--
Volker Kuhlmann is possibly list0570 with the domain in header
http://volker.dnsalias.net/ Please do not CC list postings to me.
TED]>
Sent: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:44:19 +1300
To: linux-users@it.canterbury.ac.nz
Subject: Re: VMWARE LUG offer ..
Dale Anderson wrote:
>Hi All
>
>Not sure if anyone is interested or not
>http://www.vmware.com/lugprex/lugPrez_login.jsp
>
>Cheers
>Dale.
>
>
I'm happy to go ahead and organise it ...I guess the main issue is am I
going to stand on somebodies toes if I do so ?
Is there a 'president' of CLUG pursue ?
Cheers
Dale.
On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 20:27 +1300, Robert Himmelmann wrote:
> I would also be intrested in a copy. Then I could finally ab
I would also be intrested in a copy. Then I could finally abandon my
windows partitions and try a second distro. I would also write some
comments.
Happy Hacking,
Robert
+---+
|If you don't know what 'Happy Hacking' means, read |
|the book '
> Not sure if anyone is interested or not
> http://www.vmware.com/lugprex/lugPrez_login.jsp
Yes please, I'd like a free copy. I'd even be prepared to listen to a
vmware rep and make a few comments in return...
Volker
--
Volker Kuhlmann is possibly list0570 with the domain i
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:57, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> > I wouldnt mind a turn with one of the copies...
>
> They at least used to have free 30-day evaluation licenses for
> that. Much easier for you.
I am using v5 beta[1] at the moment. Seems to be working fine from the
little I have played with it
> Dont wanna keep one, but I could certainly borrow one until I get bored
> with it...
>
> I wouldnt mind a turn with one of the copies...
They at least used to have free 30-day evaluation licenses for that.
Much easier for you.
Volker
--
Volker Kuhlmann is possibly list0570 w
Hi All
Not sure if anyone is interested or not
http://www.vmware.com/lugprex/lugPrez_login.jsp
Cheers
Dale.
54 matches
Mail list logo
