On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 04:22:29PM +1300, Yuri de Groot wrote:
> AFAICT, the list server for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> doesn't add a reply-to header if there's one already there.
> The webmail interface I'm using right now, for example, sets
> a reply-to header that's beyond my control.
It also appears
AFAICT, the list server for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
doesn't add a reply-to header if there's one already there.
The webmail interface I'm using right now, for example, sets
a reply-to header that's beyond my control.
So technically it's not _munging_, it's
_adding_if_not_already_there_.
Anyway, I stopp
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 09:23, Jim Cheetham wrote:
> I guess it's all a case of interface design - most mailers I use have at
> least two reply functions, "reply" and "reply to all". "reply to list"
> would also be useful - and I've only seen that in Mutt, but often forget
> to invoke it.
> Current
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 08:21:25AM NZDT, Yuri de Groot wrote:
>
> It was discussed and voted on previously on this list.
> The anti-munging article was refered to at that time, as
> was a pro-munging article.
>
> At the time I voted against munging, but I no longer care.
> Rather than start this
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 07:57, G. M. Bodnar wrote:
> I just ran across this argument against reply-to rewriting, and thought
> it might be an interesting read here.
It was discussed and voted on previously on this list.
The anti-munging article was refered to at that time, as
was a pro-munging article
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 07:57, G. M. Bodnar wrote:
> I just ran across this argument against reply-to rewriting, and thought
> it might be an interesting read here.
>
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
The arguments in both directions are interesting (I won't recap them all
here) but
I just ran across this argument against reply-to rewriting, and thought
it might be an interesting read here.
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
I know that I've had a few cases where I've sent personal responses
rather than list responses, and it can be frustrating. However, fixing
