-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 29 November 2002 6:59 pm, Net Llama! wrote:
> On 11/29/02 14:34, RBE wrote:
> > I have Lycoris and have been using OOo succesfully for a few years
> > (if you count 5.2). Last week, I got the following error and it
> > persists. Here is what
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, David A. Bandel wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 11:57:21 -0800 (PST)
> begin Keith Morse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed forth:
>
> > Just out of curiousity, you had mentioned awhile ago about doing 15 mile
> >
> > link and was w
Thanks for the explanation.
Joel
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 19:56:57 -0500
> begin Joel Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed forth:
>
> > Opps. "One" mistake in the note below.
> >
> > It looks like when I run ipchains-restore against a rule like thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 11:57:21 -0800 (PST)
begin Keith Morse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed forth:
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, David A. Bandel wrote:
>
> >
> > You can always ask here about wireless. I have a pretty good size
> > wireless network (and expand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 19:56:57 -0500
begin Joel Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed forth:
> Opps. "One" mistake in the note below.
>
> It looks like when I run ipchains-restore against a rule like this:
>
> -A input -s 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 -d 68.33.8.46/25
I guess I put in too much confusing (at least to me) detail.
I think my question was how to interpret ip's with numbers like:
63.11.8.26 and mask of 255.255.252.0
This seems to get interpreted by the firewall as something like:
63.11.8.0/22
So, I don't know why they are issuing such numbers, but,
I went under SuSE 8.1 and removed the eth0 for the e100 and recreated it
for the wifi using the compaq and I got access!!. I am surfing the web
using it right now. I keep losing the access point mac getting some
unknown mac. I moved the WAP away from the switchbox and it has stayed
with the right
I want to install Red Hat 7.3 on my HDD which has Suse Linux 7.1.
RH 7.3 is given in CDs of the book Red Hat Linux 7.3 Bible by Christopher
Negus.
For Partitioning it gives me option of
(1)Remove all Linux Partitions on this system
(2)Remove all partitions on this system
(3)Keep all partiti
You asked a lot, so I sprinkled my comments inside your quoted message.
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 19:38:55 -0500 Joel Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BACKGROUND:
> I am on comcast, and get dynamically assigned ip numbers now.
Yup, straight DHCP.
> This is a pain, since, as far as I can tell, com
On 11/29/02 14:34, RBE wrote:
I have Lycoris and have been using OOo succesfully for a few years (if
you count 5.2). Last week, I got the following error and it persists.
Here is what I did, what I've checked and what errors I get.
I uninstalled and deleted anything to do with OpenOffice fr
On 11/29/02 12:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"David A. Bandel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, lately mostly I'm using KNOPPIX (which is based on Debian).
I use/prefer Avaya, Orinoco, and WaveLan cards. I have Avaya APs, Orinoco
RGs, and a mix of PCMCIA cards for clients. For Windoze clients
Opps. "One" mistake in the note below.
It looks like when I run ipchains-restore against a rule like this:
-A input -s 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 -d 68.33.8.46/255.255.252.0 6346:6346 -i eth1 -p 6 -y -m 5
The rule as listed by ipchains -L -n is:
target prot opt sourcedestination
BACKGROUND:
I am on comcast, and get dynamically assigned ip numbers now.
This is a pain, since, as far as I can tell, comcast is not using a standard
dhcpd server, and they don't support "third party" software.
My dhcpcd client can't tell when the ip number is changed, so, I run a
script whenever
Jeez, all you kids! Did I tell you about the tehatchapi (SP?) quake in
'50 or '51? Felt it in Laguna Beach.
Bob
"Net Llama!" wrote:
>
> On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Tony Alfrey wrote:
> > On Sunday 24 November 2002 08:32 pm, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > > Net Llama! wrote:
> > > > Woo-hoo. There was just a
If it's not the authorities it's the local webmaster. A couple of
months ago I was screwing around (again) and had my COL broken so was
using M$ Outlook on a laptop with no protection. My man called me and
very nicely gave me and told me not to use my Windoze anymore and
get my Linux fixed.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have Lycoris and have been using OOo succesfully for a few years (if
you count 5.2). Last week, I got the following error and it persists.
Here is what I did, what I've checked and what errors I get.
I uninstalled and deleted anything to do with
"David A. Bandel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Well, lately mostly I'm using KNOPPIX (which is based on Debian).
>
>I use/prefer Avaya, Orinoco, and WaveLan cards. I have Avaya APs, Orinoco
>RGs, and a mix of PCMCIA cards for clients. For Windoze clients, best
>thing is the USB client, but that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 13:10:14 -0500
begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
> David,
>
> What distro do you use? I have trouble getting suse8.1 and RH8 to
> work on my laptop. Suse will at least give me a wlan0, but RH8 won't.
> The card is a prism2-b
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, David A. Bandel wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 13:23:08 -0800 (PST)
> begin Keith Morse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed forth:
>
> >
> > Just out of curiousity, what's the preferred flavour. Routed?
>
> might want to check our
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, David A. Bandel wrote:
>
> You can always ask here about wireless. I have a pretty good size
> wireless network (and expanding) here in Panama. 802.11b (not 802.11a),
> but the principles are the same.
>
> In fact, everything you mention above I do almost daily (VoIP, VPN
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> David,
>
> What distro do you use? I have trouble getting suse8.1 and RH8 to
> work on my laptop. Suse will at least give me a wlan0, but RH8 won't.
> The card is a prism2-based pcmcia (WPC11). I have gotten it once to
> fire but then it stalls and
David,
What distro do you use? I have trouble getting suse8.1 and RH8 to
work on my laptop. Suse will at least give me a wlan0, but RH8 won't.
The card is a prism2-based pcmcia (WPC11). I have gotten it once to
fire but then it stalls and can only ping itself. I must be missing\
something obviou
zohar wrote:
> I want to install Red Hat 7.3 on my HDD which has Suse Linux 7.1
> RH 7.3 is given in CDs of the book Red Hat Linux 7.3 Bible by Christopher
> Negus.
>
> For Partitioning it gives me option of
> (1)Remove all Linux Partitions on this system
> (2)Remove all partitions on this system
After 116 days, Marcelo seems to have released 2.4.20
final:
- 2.4.20-rc4 was released as 2.4.20 with no changes.
Summary of changes from v2.4.20-rc3 to v2.4.20-rc4
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
o Changed EXTRAVERSION to -rc4
o Cset exclude: [EMAIL PROTE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
> For those of you who hate the ugly default X background, the black
> and white crossweave net thing, here's a simple little patch that
> fixes it and makes it solid black:
uh.. why no
Just checked and didn't find anything regarding xfs other than ttmkfdir can't
cope with bad ttf fonts,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77272.
I'll file a bug once I can find a scenario that causes it 100% of the time. So
far, it's too intermittent for me to be able to file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 01:26:59 -0800 (PST)
begin Keith Morse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed forth:
> On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Kurt Wall wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 02:43:39PM -0500, dep wrote:
> >
> > [Rick Moen flamage]
> >
> > > jeeezus. sorry i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 13:23:08 -0800 (PST)
begin Keith Morse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed forth:
>
> Just out of curiousity, what's the preferred flavour. Routed?
might want to check our zebra
David A. Bandel
- --
Focus on the dream, not the competi
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 04:19:51AM -0600, ronnie gauthier wrote:
> > here is a good reason why rm is picky about what it will do and why you
> > should leave it that way.
>
> ["NiNe HoUrS" (c) (1998 Ric Moore)]
>
> > rm: '/' is a directory
> >
> >
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Kurt Wall wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 02:43:39PM -0500, dep wrote:
>
> [Rick Moen flamage]
>
> > jeeezus. sorry i brought it up. i like the guy.
>
> ROFLMAO!
>
> Kurt
Ya know, after spending the last two weeks neck deep in VOIP [1], vpn's,
firewall rulesets, and wi
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Net Llama! wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Tim Wunder wrote:
> > On 11/27/2002 9:39 AM, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote:
> > > ...i'm not in the picture...
> >
> > Yeah, you'll have to find that here:
> > http://www.linux-sxs.org/bio/lonni_friedman_bio.html
> >
> > :-)
>
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 01:23:08PM -0800, Keith Morse wrote:
> >
> > Just out of curiousity, what's the preferred flavour. Routed?
>
> Daemon-wise, routed is the only one I've ever heard of, which certainly
> isn't to say it's the only one. Most pe
Skiing is unfortunatly one of those sports that can have a high entry
fee. Especially now that equipment has changed so drasticly the last
few years. Combine that with a season pass or daily lift tickets and
its expensive. I'm sorta lucky. I get my equipment on pro or shop forms
and dont pay for ti
33 matches
Mail list logo
