On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 09:29:38PM -0800, stayler wrote:
>mod_ssl will need to be redone if memory serves
If you're on an rpm based system, ``rpm -q --whatrequires openssl'' will
tell you what is dependent on openssl. One of our Caldera OpenLinux 2.3
systems shows postfix, mod_ssl, and openld
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Wil McGilvery wrote:
> I have set up a VPN between my house and my office. The office machine is Mandrake
>9.0, Freeswan 1.98b, and Shorewall and the home router is a linksys with a VPN
>endpoint.
>
> My issue is that I can ping certain machines and not others. I can ping 19
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Net Llama! wrote:
> Well, obviously its a bad idea, but why can't you fall back to telnet now?
>
> At any rate, i think until you HUP the daemon, it will continue to run
> while its being upgraded. At least the newer versions do.
>
> On 01/06/03 20:12, m.w.chang wrote:
> >
Done it a couple times. Just cron a restart of sshd for a few minutes
later then kill sshd after the make install, plus editing of
sshd_config of course...
On Tue, 07 Jan 2003 12:12:30 +0800, m.w.chang wrote:
>how could one upgrade openssh if openssh is the only remote shell
>available on a lin
mod_ssl will need to be redone if memory serves
On Tue, 07 Jan 2003 10:07:27 +0800, m.w.chang wrote:
>just learnt that. a power failure yesterday night forced me to reboot
>the linux server, and sshd refused to run. had to recompile it.
>so far, I had recompiled: proftpd, fetchmail, openssh,
I did find a free package, CvoiceControl, which seems to work. It is
expressly designed to transmit commands to a command line. So, I think this
deserves further study.
My problem is my sound card. The sound comes through very garbled on my
speakers. Despite this, it still recognized commands, alt
Well, obviously its a bad idea, but why can't you fall back to telnet now?
At any rate, i think until you HUP the daemon, it will continue to run
while its being upgraded. At least the newer versions do.
On 01/06/03 20:12, m.w.chang wrote:
how could one upgrade openssh if openssh is the only r
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 11:09:50PM -0500, Wil McGilvery wrote:
>I have set up a VPN between my house and my office. The office machine is
>Mandrake 9.0, Freeswan 1.98b, and Shorewall and the home router is a
>linksys with a VPN endpoint.
>My issue is that I can ping certain machines and not other
I use tight VNC and it will do what you want. Tight VNC has several good options for
use over slow connections.
Regards,
Wil McGilvery
Manager, Digital Media
416-744-7191
416-716-3964 (cell)
1-888-622-3729
416-744-0406 FAX
www.LynchDigital.com
-Original Message-
From: Jack Berger [
I have set up a VPN between my house and my office. The office machine is Mandrake
9.0, Freeswan 1.98b, and Shorewall and the home router is a linksys with a VPN
endpoint.
My issue is that I can ping certain machines and not others. I can ping 192.168.1.7,
192.168.1.4 and 192.168.1.12 but not 1
how could one upgrade openssh if openssh is the only remote shell
available on a linux server? I always fell back to telnet when I needed
to update openssh.
--
Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. .~. In Linux We Trust.
news://news.hkpcug.org/ v \ http://www.linux-sxs.org
news://news.linux
Here's one possible candidate. Haven't tried it myself but the claim is that it
can do what you want.
Power Sessions with Screen
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=6340
Another candidate is VNC, which we use quite a bit, mostly for remote admin
sessions, but the effect is the same.
Oka !
On Mon, 06 Jan 2003 19:27:01 -0800
"Net Llama!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the PLAY button on the CD drive :)
>
> On 01/06/03 19:21, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
> > They say it can but they recommend XMMS. What do you use for audio CDs?
> >
> > On Mon, 06 Jan 2003 19:17:29 -0800
> >
the PLAY button on the CD drive :)
On 01/06/03 19:21, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
They say it can but they recommend XMMS. What do you use for audio CDs?
On Mon, 06 Jan 2003 19:17:29 -0800
"Net Llama!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't know if Mplayer can do music CDs. I never tried.
On 01/06
I don't know if Mplayer can do music CDs. I never tried.
On 01/06/03 19:07, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
I give up ! How do I play a music CD?? I can't figure that out. I've tried mounting my music CD but mount complains about that (not surprisingly )! XMMS would simply use the device but with mpla
They say it can but they recommend XMMS. What do you use for audio CDs?
On Mon, 06 Jan 2003 19:17:29 -0800
"Net Llama!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know if Mplayer can do music CDs. I never tried.
>
> On 01/06/03 19:07, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
> > I give up ! How do I play a music CD?
I would like to have a linux computer be able to respond to simple voice
commands. For example, to words like menu, action or cancel and also
to letters and numbers. This might allow hands off control of a linux
box. Is anybody on this list doing this?
Thanks,
Joel
__
I give up ! How do I play a music CD?? I can't figure that out. I've tried
mounting my music CD but mount complains about that (not surprisingly )! XMMS
would simply use the device but with mplayer I can't find the combination. to run it.
On Mon, 06 Jan 2003 17:57:45 -0800
"Net Llama!" <[EMAI
2 more: wget and lynx
m.w.chang wrote:
> just learnt that. a power failure yesterday night forced me to reboot
> the linux server, and sshd refused to run. had to recompile it.
> so far, I had recompiled: proftpd, fetchmail, openssh, bind.
> I think sendmail would have been affected if I used ssl
is it possible to place a link for db.html (compiling berneley db-4.x)
in section "database"? that makes sense, I believe. :)
right now, it's listed only as a part of sendmail_antispam.
also, the gcc_notes was not listed under any section... if I didn't miss it.
--
Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly
Okay, I understand now. I've just merged it and will see how it looks.
On Mon, 06 Jan 2003 17:57:45 -0800
"Net Llama!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yea, the MPlayer dox are not bad at all. They're a cocky bunch, but
> hey, if you reverse engineered half the codecs that they did, you'd be a
>
No they shouldn't . But they need to be able to know that .
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003 20:59:12 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Feigning erudition, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
> % Hmm, I'll look at Mplayer then. I understand almost all of the stuff we use is
>done by people like us in our spare time bu
just learnt that. a power failure yesterday night forced me to reboot
the linux server, and sshd refused to run. had to recompile it.
so far, I had recompiled: proftpd, fetchmail, openssh, bind.
I think sendmail would have been affected if I used ssl login.
let me check apache...
Net Llama! wrote
Feigning erudition, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
% Hmm, I'll look at Mplayer then. I understand almost all of the stuff we use is done
by people like us in our spare time but it seems the docs or at least a decent
overview of what a package does and what you need is lacking on most things out there
Yea, the MPlayer dox are not bad at all. They're a cocky bunch, but
hey, if you reverse engineered half the codecs that they did, you'd be a
bit full of yourself too.
ALthough, in compelte honesty, MPLayer sux for DVDs. It can play them
just fine, but that's all it can do. Forget menu naviga
The web site mentions that it has DVD capabilities in it - and tells you what you need
to to encrypted! A nice change from xine.
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003 20:41:49 -0500
"Brett I. Holcomb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, I'll look at Mplayer then. I understand almost all of the stuff we use is done
Hmm, I'll look at Mplayer then. I understand almost all of the stuff we use is done
by people like us in our spare time but it seems the docs or at least a decent
overview of what a package does and what you need is lacking on most things out there
- even some of the "professional" ones!
Docs
You're right about xine. That's why i only recommend it for playing
DVD's cause just bout everything else is this hazy mist. I'd suggest
going with MPlayer for playing everything but DVDs. It has far better
performance, and supports alot more movie formats than Xine.
On 01/06/03 17:20, Brett
On 01/06/03 17:00, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
What is divx4 used for - I assume it's some kind of format for DVDs?
Actually it has nothing to do with DVDs. Its for DIVX formatted movies
(AVI's mostly).
--
~
L. Friedman
Okay, thanks. That's what I get for assuming! I'm getting ready to merge xine on my
Gentoo and wanted to find out what I really needed (I installed xine on a WS 3.1 and
remember having to sort through all the mess to find out what was what- but that was
a while ago). After reading the xine d
What is divx4 used for - I assume it's some kind of format for DVDs?
Thanks.
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Thanks to Bill Davidson we now have a Step on Compiling a driver into Ghostsript.
You may find this step at http://www.linux-sxs.org/ghostscript_compile.html
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.or
I hope not. That's a nasty business. The Promise RAID drivers are in
the later kernels but I'm not sure how well they work. My understanding
of the Promise is that most of the work is done by the drivers anyway,
so there's not much advantage over the in-kernel software RAID support.
I would ten
On Sat, 04 Jan 2003 23:25:11 -0500
Jerry McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm waiting for the version that has those particular problems fixed.
> Then it will be a very nice printer daemon. That manual intervention
> that you mention is just fine... unless you've got to walk a mile to
> kick
At 05:55 PM 5/01/2003 -0500, you wrote:
If you want to know how to put both Win boxes on the same subnet using the
bridge tools, let me know and I'll provide you a short SxS.
Ciao,
David A. Bandel
I would appreciate that very much thank you, David.
Keith Antoine
___
At 09:39 AM 6/01/2003 -0800, you wrote:
I'm not sure I understand, but here goes. The different drive letters
are quite normal for the Promise controller. Will it not install once
the RAID is on? That's a kernel support issue, so if Mandrake doesn't
support the Promise RAID setup then you'll ha
Have you got USB Legacy Support enabled in BIOS? Shouldn't be
necessary, but it might help.
On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 10:17, Susan Macchia wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Hope you all had a good holiday. I spent some time trying to get my
> second PC installed with RH 8.0. I had some problems that I was
I'm not sure I understand, but here goes. The different drive letters
are quite normal for the Promise controller. Will it not install once
the RAID is on? That's a kernel support issue, so if Mandrake doesn't
support the Promise RAID setup then you'll have to make a kernel that
does before you
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 08:21:17AM -0700, Andrew Mathews wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Matthew,
>
> I'm Andy, not Matthew.
Sorry, Andy. I could have sworn I wrote "Andrew Matthews," but it was
early.
> >I'm unable to send you email:
> >
> >Reporting-MTA: dns; marta.kurtwerks.com
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David A. Bandel spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
> What's in your /proc/mtrr file anyway and are you sure you can do better?
reg00: base=0x ( 0MB), size=2048MB; write-back, count=1
I'm pretty sure that is not optimal
- --
Doug
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthew,
I'm Andy, not Matthew.
I'm unable to send you email:
Reporting-MTA: dns; marta.kurtwerks.com
Received-From-MTA: DNS; luther
Arrival-Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 00:22:23 -0500
Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: failed
Status:
The "symlink method" doesn't always work for everything.
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, m.w.chang wrote:
>
> that means i have to recompile all programs that depends on openssl?
> doh... maybe I should stay with the symlink solution for a while...
>
> > Building static binaries should be avoided unless you
David A. Bandel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 05 Jan 2003 19:33:08 -0800
begin Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed forth:
Tom Condon wrote:
On Saturday 04 January 2003 14:04, Ken Moffat carved in granite:
Great! I'm glad to hear that you had
Collins wrote:
I don't know if this is your problem, but the one time I had segfaults
from mozilla, strace pointed to a problem with handling fonts. XFree86
latest changed the way to handle fonts when you add a new font libarary,
and I had overlooked this.
This was, I think, the problem, si
I was just wondering about the possiblity of effortless upgrade when the
core of all these security compoennts was changed.
wonder how the military handles this kind of changes... :)
stayer wrote:
> I've found that its best to recompile those applications, especially
> openssh whenever openssl i
how would openpkg help resolve the version dependency problems?
Bill Campbell wrote:
I'm looking very seriously at moving all of our customization and local
additions to work under the openpkg package manager. This allows one to
work without changing the vendor's stuff at all, and is supported o
On Sun, 05 Jan 2003 17:42:22 -0800
Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arghh, I'm having more troubles.
> I just got mozilla 1.2.1 and galeon working a couple of days ago by
> going to unstable and installing the debs, but now I've upgraded to
> unstable more fully, and I'm getting a seg fau
Matthew,
I'm unable to send you email:
Reporting-MTA: dns; marta.kurtwerks.com
Received-From-MTA: DNS; luther
Arrival-Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 00:22:23 -0500
Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: failed
Status: 5.7.1
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 5.7.1 Access d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 05 Jan 2003 19:33:08 -0800
begin Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed forth:
> Tom Condon wrote:
>
> >On Saturday 04 January 2003 14:04, Ken Moffat carved in granite:
> >
> >
> >>>Great! I'm glad to hear that you had good results and enj
that means i have to recompile all programs that depends on openssl?
doh... maybe I should stay with the symlink solution for a while...
> Building static binaries should be avoided unless you have a really good
> reason. They're an order of magnitude larger, and less efficient. I
> wouldn't
50 matches
Mail list logo
