On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Collins wrote:
> Anyone familiar with linux/fireware/adapters etc.?
> I'm looking to attach my JVC DVL805 camcorder to my linux box.
> Obviously I will need to add a firewire adapter to the box and software.
> I would love to hear your suggestions
Hi Collins,
You could take a
Feigning erudition, Bonez wrote:
% Help:
%
% I went to print to my trusty HP laser jet iii and it stopped responding.
What's changed between the last successful print session and now?
[...]
Kurt
--
Shaw's Principle:
Build a system that even a fool can use, and only a fool will
want to
Feigning erudition, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
% -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
% Hash: SHA1
%
% David A. Bandel spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
% > If you don't have an entry that seems to match your video card's memory,
% > it's almost certainly not optimized. What version of X
It feels like it sometimes . Not that many by a long shot. You want to get deluge
- join openoffice users!
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 23:07:31 -0500
Tim Wunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 10 January 2003 9:22 pm, someone claiming to be Brett I. Holcomb
> wrote:
> > Yes, I used the L key b
On Friday 10 January 2003 9:22 pm, someone claiming to be Brett I. Holcomb
wrote:
> Yes, I used the L key but the frustration for me was that 99.98% of my
> lists responded to clicking on the reply button and filled out the reply to
> correctly. Not two of them - ...
You're on 1 mailing lis
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 20:28:21 -0700
Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 21:22:09 -0500
> "Brett I. Holcomb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > mailboxes filling up and bouncing back so we'll mess up the reply to
> > headers!
>
> This is much the same as the emacs vs. anything
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 21:22:09 -0500
"Brett I. Holcomb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not two of them - they used the lame excuse
> (maybe one day I'll really express my feelings on this subject ) of
> mailboxes filling up and bouncing back so we'll mess up the reply to
> headers!
This is much the
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 15:55:26 -0500 Bruce Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 09 January 2003 0:20 am, Jerry McBride wrote:
> > I've got it on my home lan and my personal lapop. We'll see just how
> > good it is for that purpose... it is beta, but so far it looks ok. As
> > for perfor
On Tuesday 07 January 2003 8:43 pm, someone claiming to be David A. Bandel
wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2003 10:56:37 -0500
>
> reg00: base=0x ( 0MB), size= 256MB: write-back, count=1
> reg01: base=0xe400 (3648MB), size= 64MB: write-combining, count=1
> reg02: base=0xdc00 (3520MB), s
On Friday 10 January 2003 21:48 pm, Jerry McBride wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 15:55:26 -0500 Bruce Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > On Thursday 09 January 2003 0:20 am, Jerry McBride wrote:
> > > I've got it on my home lan and my personal lapop. We'll see just
> > > how good it is for that
[ snips ]
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 11:42:26 -0500
"David A. Bandel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Jan 2003 07:57:00 +1000
> begin Keith Antoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed forth:
>
> > At 05:55 PM 5/01/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> >
> > >If you want to know how to put both Win boxes on t
Yes, I used the L key but the frustration for me was that 99.98% of my lists responded
to clicking on the reply button and filled out the reply to correctly. Not two of
them - they used the lame excuse (maybe one day I'll really express my feelings on
this subject ) of mailboxes filling up and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 17:20:12 -0500 (EST), Net Llama! wrote:
>I'm trying to setup rsync over ssh without giving the user a shell
>account. Unfortunately, setting the user's shell to /bin/false prevents
>the rsync from running, as it fails with this er
On Friday 10 January 2003 18:11 pm, Aaron Grewell wrote:
> Wow, I've never heard of anyone being able to kill an LJIII. They are
> some of the most indestructible printers I've ever seen. The easiest
> way (once you've printed a test page to make sure the printer isn't
> well and truly dead) is t
Wow, I've never heard of anyone being able to kill an LJIII. They are
some of the most indestructible printers I've ever seen. The easiest
way (once you've printed a test page to make sure the printer isn't well
and truly dead) is to plug it into a different machine. Use a different
cable as wel
There are several packages that have to be updated for the new kernel to
work properly, some of which are as ever-changing as the development
kernel itself. The ones I remember were e2fsprogs, xfsprogs, procps,
modutils, and alsa-utils. e2fsprogs and xfsprogs were cake, but procps
was big fun. T
Net Llama! wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Andrew Mathews wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:
I'm trying to setup rsync over ssh without giving the user a shell
account. Unfortunately, setting the user's shell to /bin/false prevents
the rsync from running, as it fails with this error:
rsync: connection une
Help:
I went to print to my trusty HP laser jet iii and it stopped responding.
I am not sure if I have sent it some weird command that makes it not talk to
my system any more (caldera 3.1) but it has printed fine for the past several
months. Now, neither Windows nor Linux will print to it.
H
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Andrew Mathews wrote:
> Net Llama! wrote:
> > I'm trying to setup rsync over ssh without giving the user a shell
> > account. Unfortunately, setting the user's shell to /bin/false prevents
> > the rsync from running, as it fails with this error:
> > rsync: connection unexpect
Net Llama! wrote:
I'm trying to setup rsync over ssh without giving the user a shell
account. Unfortunately, setting the user's shell to /bin/false prevents
the rsync from running, as it fails with this error:
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes read so far)
rsync error: error in rsync
I'm trying to setup rsync over ssh without giving the user a shell
account. Unfortunately, setting the user's shell to /bin/false prevents
the rsync from running, as it fails with this error:
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes read so far)
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David A. Bandel spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
> If you don't have an entry that seems to match your video card's memory,
> it's almost certainly not optimized. What version of X are you running?
> Perhaps you need to upgrade? Or may
On Thursday 09 January 2003 0:20 am, Jerry McBride wrote:
> I've got it on my home lan and my personal lapop. We'll see just how
> good it is for that purpose... it is beta, but so far it looks ok. As
> for performance, it seems like all the previous builds.
>
>
> Hmm... just got a message, 2.5.55
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 07 Jan 2003 07:57:00 +1000
begin Keith Antoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed forth:
> At 05:55 PM 5/01/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>
>
> >If you want to know how to put both Win boxes on the same subnet using
> >the bridge tools, let me know and I'
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, David A. Bandel wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 11:56:35 -0500
> begin Douglas J Hunley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed forth:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > David A. Bandel spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
> > > > reg00: base=0x
Probably pretty close, but I would suspect other standards-based clients
(Outlook Express, Eudora) would get the same result. Exchange probably
(intelligently - ha ha) strips the out the proprietary code in messages
accessed by a POP client. Mozilla probably never gets the chance to decode it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 11:56:35 -0500
begin Douglas J Hunley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed forth:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> David A. Bandel spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
> > > reg00: base=0x ( 0MB), siz
Susan Macchia wrote:
Hi all,
Before I state my problem, I want to apologize for this not being a linux only
question. But I thought that some of you might have experienced this problem.
Ok, here goes:
At my job most folks use MS Outlook for email and generally format their email
in HTML.
I u
Jerry McBride wrote:
Hmmm... I am running rc6 here and... what is KPF?
Quote from the KDE security advisory:
"kpf is a file sharing utility that can be docked into the
KDE kicker bar. It uses a subset of the HTTP protocol internally
and acts much similiar to a webserver
And one more thing...
On the one list I'm on where a reply-to goes to the sender instead of the
list you have to anticipate getting at least eight out-of-office
auto-replies and undeliverable mail notifications. And no one does
anything about it, because it's more trouble than it's worth to de
Feigning erudition, Susan Macchia wrote:
% Hi all,
%
% I use Mozilla connecting to the exchange server which is POP. I like mozilla
% much better, with its color coding of the inbox, etc. When I receive outlook
% html formatted email, it looks like plain text in mozilla. This is a real
% proble
31 matches
Mail list logo
