That's what I understand too. But it's more than a bit.
There are things you might want to install or uninstall that have a
cron task associated with them. With the cron.d directory, the RPM
can just drop the required file into the directory and nothing else
is needed. If you uninstall the RPM,
Can anyone recommend a software app that provides streaming video from a webcam?
Specifically... I had a need for watching realtime video from an attached usb
logitech quickcam. Perhaps with the option of taking snapshots, recording to
.avi and maybe some kind of security type motion detection...
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003 09:47:11 +1000 Keith Antoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> OFB.BIZ: MANDRAKESOFT DECLARES BANKRUPTCY
>
> "MandrakeSoft, the developer of the popular Mandrake Linux
> distribution, declared bankruptcy in France today..."
>
> COMPLETE STORY:
> http://www.ofb.biz/modules.php?na
yes, you can. just like inet.d
ronnie gauthier wrote:
About all I can see there is like Llama said. You can keep things a bit more
orderly. Also, crontab is a single file, you can throw as many files as you
want into cron.d, I have not tried it but I think that you can probably throw a
shell scri
Thanks for calling it to my attention and to Collins for the fix! I had
this come up once before on a mailing list but most of the people could
read it and one person indicated it was the clients responsibility to
wrap it but some clients were broken and didn't follow the rfc. I
didn't followup s
Perfect! That did the trick, thanks!
On 01/15/03 14:42, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
Per Mr. Collins I've set wrap before sending. It was using Smart wrap
(lableled experimental) so let's see what happens.
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 19:29:33 -0800
"Net Llama!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 01/14/03 19:2
About all I can see there is like Llama said. You can keep things a bit more
orderly. Also, crontab is a single file, you can throw as many files as you
want into cron.d, I have not tried it but I think that you can probably throw a
shell script in there too.
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:48:56 -0500 - D
OFB.BIZ: MANDRAKESOFT DECLARES BANKRUPTCY
"MandrakeSoft, the developer of the popular Mandrake Linux
distribution, declared bankruptcy in France today..."
COMPLETE STORY:
http://www.ofb.biz/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=192
--
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'skippy'
18 Arkana St, The Ga
Interesting. No way do I want to return to Windows, er KDE but it would
be nice it a browser like that would be available for Linux. I guess I
could check and see what merging Konq would drag in to run under xfce.
Although when I used Konq under 2.2.1 it was useless as a browswer -
wonder if it
Per Mr. Collins I've set wrap before sending. It was using Smart wrap
(lableled experimental) so let's see what happens.
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 19:29:33 -0800
"Net Llama!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 01/14/03 19:23, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
> > Wordwrap is and has been set for 72 since I starte
Truly weird. I've done quite a few good Workstation 3.1.1 installs.
Once, I got a bad copy and it looked fine but kept failing during the
install. Check your ISO image against the MD5 sums and then reburn it...
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 09:39:31 -0600
"Rick Sivernell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> W
http://news.com.com/2100-1023-980492.html?part=dtx&tag=ntop
Apple's new browser is based on KHTML! :)
BTW- For those of you who left KDE and never looked back, KHTML has
become quite good in KDE3+ (which is far better than KDE2)
___
Linux-users mailing
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 19:08:40 +0100
Norbert Augenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 10:07:00AM -0600, Rick Sivernell wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 08:59:16 +0100
> > Roger Oberholtzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 01:46:13 -0600
> > > Rick Sivern
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 10:07:00AM -0600, Rick Sivernell wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 08:59:16 +0100
> Roger Oberholtzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 01:46:13 -0600
> > Rick Sivernell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > List
> > >
> > >On a newly installed 3.1
On Tuesday 14 January 2003 07:23 pm, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
> Thanks. I was afraid that was the case and that's why I restated
> things more clearly. My first question was not very clear.
>
> Wordwrap is and has been set for 72 since I started using this a few
> weeks ago. What client are you u
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Rick Sivernell wrote:
> Well, after some more investagation I find that:
> 1. in user mutt fails, sylpheed bind permission denied.
> 2 in root logon mutt works great and so does sylpheed.
>
> checked pam mail setting and services, inetd.conf all
> seem to be the same as my mac
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
> ronnie gauthier spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
> > Its for cron jobs that dont fit into the periodic folders, say every five
> > minutes or bi-weekly. Also you can use regular crontab syntax, the
> > periodics should only contain shell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ronnie gauthier spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
> Its for cron jobs that dont fit into the periodic folders, say every five
> minutes or bi-weekly. Also you can use regular crontab syntax, the
> periodics should only contain shell scrip
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 08:59:16 +0100
Roger Oberholtzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 01:46:13 -0600
> Rick Sivernell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > List
> >
> >On a newly installed 3.1.1 Server sylpheed returns
> > Bind: permission denied. Nowthe bind should be the b
Feigning erudition, m.w.chang wrote:
%
% most distributions use xinetd not inetd
Not so.
Kurt
--
Everything is controlled by a small evil group to which, unfortunately,
no one we know belongs.
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 01:46:13 -0600
Rick Sivernell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> List
>
>On a newly installed 3.1.1 Server sylpheed returns
> Bind: permission denied. Nowthe bind should be the binding
> to a socket I assume. How do I fix this. Sylpheed 0.8.8
> bulds and install clean. Any
21 matches
Mail list logo