Turns out that the permissions on all of /tmp were somehow messed up. I
don't know how this is possible, when I tarred up the entire / filesystem
(which included eveything but /boot). So X is working now, although
something is still screwy with fonts, cause i can't open an xterm. Seems
that it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Net Llama! wrote:
| Turns out that the permissions on all of /tmp were somehow messed up. I
| don't know how this is possible, when I tarred up the entire / filesystem
| (which included eveything but /boot). So X is working now, although
| something
'tarred' to copy a system? Yikes. I know GNU tar is better at this than
older tars, but I would have used cpio, which handles device and
special files (like pipes) better. Just personal (and probably
superstitious) behavior.
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 09:39:34 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
begin Roger Oberholtzer's quote:
| And by licenses, I would imagine that must mean SOURCE licenses,
| Since my Caldera came with the SOURCE (GNU and all that) as well as
| a License from SCO, am I a SOURCE licensee? Of course, not of
| UnixWare/SVR5. The interview referrd to 30,000 licensees.
Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
And by licenses, I would imagine that must mean SOURCE licenses, Since my
Caldera came with the SOURCE (GNU and all that) as well as a License from
SCO, am I a SOURCE licensee? Of course, not of UnixWare/SVR5. The interview
referrd to 30,000 licensees. These cannot be
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 09:55:58 -0400
dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there's no way i can find, or anyone i can find who does not get paid
by sco who believes, that users are at any risk at all.
I feel this as well. Still, I was surprised to get the letter in the e-mail
from them.
The 'funny'
You may be right. I just did 'tar cvf f00.tar /' and ended up with a
2.6GB tarball, which seemed about right. At this point the only damage
appears to be the /tmp permissions weirdness, and the current 'missing'
fonts.The laptop is at home, so i'll do some more digging tonight.
On Mon, 2
On Monday 02 June 2003 11:18, Shawn L Johnston wrote:
Does anyone know anything about this Enterprise Desktop product? I've
only seen this article on it
http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/04/02/HNsusedelay_1.html
which says that its supposed to be available in June, but I haven't
found
I'm attempting to write a script that will delete a certain portion of a
data file. What I want to do is delete everything between (and including)
two lines, line A and line B
The file:
...
#lineA
...
#lineB
...
To an extent I don't really care what tool is used, but I've been unable
to
Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
On Sat, 31 May 2003 09:08:02 -0400
Joel Hammer<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I used to use WP8 for linux. Fine program but it did get a bit outdated. I
> think I finally got fed up with the filter nonsense.
>
> I tried WP office 2000 when it first came out. It was a dog,
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm attempting to write a script that will delete a
certain portion of a
data file. What I want to do is delete everything
between (and including)
two lines, line A and line B
The file:
...
#lineA
...
#lineB
...
To an extent I don't really care what
I'm using Slackware 9.0 with 1 GB ram. After checking the syslog I've
noticed a waring message telling the kernel was using just 896 Mb ram.
Why?
Thanks
Enrico
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Enrico Pirani wrote:
I'm using Slackware 9.0 with 1 GB ram. After checking the syslog I've
noticed a waring message telling the kernel was using just 896 Mb ram.
Why?
What exactly does the warning look like? What kind of videcard do you
have? What does the output from
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Net Llama! wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Enrico Pirani wrote:
I'm using Slackware 9.0 with 1 GB ram. After checking the syslog I've
noticed a waring message telling the kernel was using just 896 Mb ram.
Why?
What exactly does the warning look like?
May 14
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Enrico Pirani wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Net Llama! wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Enrico Pirani wrote:
I'm using Slackware 9.0 with 1 GB ram. After checking the syslog I've
noticed a waring message telling the kernel was using just 896 Mb ram.
Why?
What
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Net Llama! wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Enrico Pirani wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Net Llama! wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Enrico Pirani wrote:
I'm using Slackware 9.0 with 1 GB ram. After checking the syslog I've
noticed a waring message telling the kernel
Not sure if this applies to your distro, but in Mandrake there are 2 different kernals
and the enterprise is required for that much ram. Just a thought.
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 22:17:42 +0200 (CEST)
Enrico Pirani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Net Llama! wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun
On Monday 02 June 2003 04:17 pm, Enrico Pirani wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Net Llama! wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Enrico Pirani wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Net Llama! wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Enrico Pirani wrote:
I'm using Slackware 9.0 with 1 GB ram. After checking the syslog
On Monday 02 June 2003 04:34 pm, Vern W Heesch wrote:
Not sure if this applies to your distro, but in Mandrake there are 2
different kernals and the enterprise is required for that much ram. Just a
thought.
Not exactly, what you are thinking about is the kernel ability to use 3G or
more.
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Dennis Veatch wrote:
On Monday 02 June 2003 04:17 pm, Enrico Pirani wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Net Llama! wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Enrico Pirani wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Net Llama! wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Enrico Pirani wrote:
I'm using Slackware
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 16:52:27 -0400
Dennis Veatch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 02 June 2003 04:34 pm, Vern W Heesch wrote:
Not sure if this applies to your distro, but in Mandrake there are 2
different kernals and the enterprise is required for that much ram.
Just a thought.
Not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Enrico Pirani wrote:
snip
| My card is a PCI based video card equipped with 128Mb DDR-Ram.
snip
| Enrico
snip
You also need to verify that
1. Your system BIOS is actually enabling your total amount of memory.
2. Your motherboard supports that
On Monday 02 June 2003 05:14 pm, Enrico Pirani wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Dennis Veatch wrote:
On Monday 02 June 2003 04:17 pm, Enrico Pirani wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Net Llama! wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Enrico Pirani wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Net Llama! wrote:
On Mon, 2
On Monday 02 June 2003 05:52 pm, David A. Bandel wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 16:52:27 -0400
Dennis Veatch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 02 June 2003 04:34 pm, Vern W Heesch wrote:
Not sure if this applies to your distro, but in Mandrake there are 2
different kernals and the
On 06/02/03 06:52, Andrew Mathews wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:
| Turns out that the permissions on all of /tmp were somehow messed up. I
| don't know how this is possible, when I tarred up the entire / filesystem
| (which included eveything but /boot). So X is working now, although
| something is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Net Llama! wrote:
snip
|
| Looks kosher. Seems that the error that is getting dumped is:
| The font -bh-lucida-bold-r-normal-*-*-140-*-*-*-*-iso8559-* does not
| support all the required character sets for the current locale
| en_US.UTF.8
|
Ick. One
On 06/02/03 17:40, Net Llama! wrote:
On 06/02/03 06:52, Andrew Mathews wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:
| Turns out that the permissions on all of /tmp were somehow messed
up. I
| don't know how this is possible, when I tarred up the entire /
filesystem
| (which included eveything but /boot). So X
For multiline edititing in sed, read about N and read about the hold space,
too.
Joel
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 09:24:24AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm attempting to write a script that will delete a certain portion of a
data file. What I want to do is delete everything between (and
28 matches
Mail list logo
