Re: recording wavs

2003-09-17 Thread Roger Oberholtzer
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 01:11:01 -0400 Tim Wunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Really? > I've always been under the impression that there wasn't any real audible > difference between 8-bit audio and 16-bit. Time for some > experimentation... What is the bit rate on Super Audio CDs (SACD)? They are s

Re: sftp hash marks

2003-09-17 Thread Gary Wilson
--- Matthew Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > scp does this, which is the non-interactive version > of sftp more of a cp command... > > On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 08:54:14 -0400 > "Shannon Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Does anyone know a method for showing hash marks > or download/upload

Re: recording wavs

2003-09-17 Thread Tim Wunder
Really? I've always been under the impression that there wasn't any real audible difference between 8-bit audio and 16-bit. Time for some experimentation... Tim On Wednesday 17 September 2003 10:49 pm, someone claiming to be Matthew Carpenter wrote: > 11 bit is used for a lot of voice. 16 bit

Re: OT: Here we go again ...

2003-09-17 Thread Matthew Carpenter
Blaster Worm Linked to Severity of Blackout http://www.computerworld.com/databasetopics/data/story/0,10801,84519,00.html "On the day of the blackout, Blaster degraded the performance of several communications lines linking key data centers used by utility companies to manage the power grid" Whi

Re: OT: Here we go again ...

2003-09-17 Thread Matthew Carpenter
They haven't drawn the conclusion that the initial outage was caused by it, but there are reports (computerworld I believe) that MSBlast was responsible for clogging the network pipe between power stations used to avoid the cascading effect. The cascade-avoidance system simply couldn't do it's

Re: sftp hash marks

2003-09-17 Thread Matthew Carpenter
scp does this, which is the non-interactive version of sftp more of a cp command... On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 08:54:14 -0400 "Shannon Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone know a method for showing hash marks or download/upload progress with > sftp? > I would like to get the same effect the

Re: recording wavs

2003-09-17 Thread Matthew Carpenter
11 bit is used for a lot of voice. 16 bit is the accepted standard for music... some stereophiles love 24bit, and 32bit just seems a little like overkill. On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 09:12:07 +0100 "Squabsy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 22:25:38 -0400, "Tim Wunder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: sftp hash marks

2003-09-17 Thread Kurt Wall
Quoth Shannon Scott: > Does anyone know a method for showing hash marks or download/upload progress with > sftp? > I would like to get the same effect the hash command has for ftp. I don't see that sftp supports this. Kurt -- Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tom

Re: any acrobat experts here?

2003-09-17 Thread burns
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 18:33, Tim Wunder wrote: > Hmmm... > Doesn't look like I even *have* an enscript executable... > # locate enscript > /usr/share/apps/kdeprint/filters/enscript.desktop > /usr/share/apps/kdeprint/filters/enscript.xml > /opt/kde3/share/apps/kdeprint/filters/enscript.desktop > /op

Re: OT: Here we go again ...

2003-09-17 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 18:38 pm, Joel Hammer wrote: > Wouldn't it be great if people starting saying, enuf is enuf. > > Maybe if people whose computers were cracked and taken over by hackers > faced legal sanctions (fines, suspension of service, etc.), they would > take responsibility to fi

Re: any acrobat experts here?

2003-09-17 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 18:33 pm, Tim Wunder wrote: > On Wednesday 17 September 2003 9:15 am, someone claiming to be Bruce > Marshall > > wrote: > > On Wednesday 17 September 2003 8:52 am, Tim Wunder wrote: > > > On 9/17/2003 8:44 AM, someone claiming to be Bruce Marshall wrote: > > > > On W

Re: OT: Here we go again ...

2003-09-17 Thread Joel Hammer
Wouldn't it be great if people starting saying, enuf is enuf. Maybe if people whose computers were cracked and taken over by hackers faced legal sanctions (fines, suspension of service, etc.), they would take responsibility to fix up their boxes. Now, the lazy bones (or is it brain dead?) windows

Re: any acrobat experts here?

2003-09-17 Thread Tim Wunder
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 9:15 am, someone claiming to be Bruce Marshall wrote: > On Wednesday 17 September 2003 8:52 am, Tim Wunder wrote: > > On 9/17/2003 8:44 AM, someone claiming to be Bruce Marshall wrote: > > > On Wednesday 17 September 2003 8:34 am, Tim Wunder wrote: > > >>On 9/17/2003

Re: any acrobat experts here?

2003-09-17 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 8:52 am, Tim Wunder wrote: > On 9/17/2003 8:44 AM, someone claiming to be Bruce Marshall wrote: > > On Wednesday 17 September 2003 8:34 am, Tim Wunder wrote: > >>On 9/17/2003 8:29 AM, someone claiming to be Bruce Marshall wrote: > >>>On Tuesday 16 September 2003 23:03

sftp hash marks

2003-09-17 Thread Shannon Scott
Does anyone know a method for showing hash marks or download/upload progress with sftp? I would like to get the same effect the hash command has for ftp.   Thank You Shannon     ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -

Re: any acrobat experts here?

2003-09-17 Thread Tim Wunder
On 9/17/2003 8:44 AM, someone claiming to be Bruce Marshall wrote: On Wednesday 17 September 2003 8:34 am, Tim Wunder wrote: On 9/17/2003 8:29 AM, someone claiming to be Bruce Marshall wrote: On Tuesday 16 September 2003 23:03 pm, Tim Wunder wrote: On Tuesday 16 September 2003 7:58 am, someone

Re: any acrobat experts here?

2003-09-17 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 8:34 am, Tim Wunder wrote: > On 9/17/2003 8:29 AM, someone claiming to be Bruce Marshall wrote: > > On Tuesday 16 September 2003 23:03 pm, Tim Wunder wrote: > >>On Tuesday 16 September 2003 7:58 am, someone claiming to be dep wrote: > >>>greets. > >>> > >>>i've been

Re: any acrobat experts here?

2003-09-17 Thread Tim Wunder
On 9/17/2003 8:29 AM, someone claiming to be Bruce Marshall wrote: On Tuesday 16 September 2003 23:03 pm, Tim Wunder wrote: On Tuesday 16 September 2003 7:58 am, someone claiming to be dep wrote: greets. i've been printing from acrobat via cups. the command is lp -d LJIIIDSS. problem is, i cann

Re: any acrobat experts here?

2003-09-17 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Tuesday 16 September 2003 23:03 pm, Tim Wunder wrote: > On Tuesday 16 September 2003 7:58 am, someone claiming to be dep wrote: > > greets. > > > > i've been printing from acrobat via cups. the command is lp -d > > LJIIIDSS. problem is, i cannot get acrobat to remember this, and i > > cannot fin

Re: recording wavs

2003-09-17 Thread Shawn Tayler
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 09:12:07 +0100 "Squabsy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> professed: > I notice that you state 8 bit I may well have mine set at 16 or even > 32bit (can't check till this evening) > Is 8 bit adequate For voice quaility 8bit is just fine. For music, no way. 16bit, per channel at 44K/sec

Re: OT: Here we go again ...

2003-09-17 Thread dep
quoth Michael Hipp: | http://apnews.excite.com/article/20030916/D7TJP93G0.html | | By TED BRIDIS | | WASHINGTON (AP) - Security researchers on Tuesday detected hackers | distributing software to break into computers using flaws announced | last week in some versions of Microsoft Corp. (MSFT)'s Wind

Re: recording wavs

2003-09-17 Thread Squabsy
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 22:25:38 -0400, "Tim Wunder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > FWIW, 20 minutes of 44.1KHz 8-bit stereo recorded from vinyl takes up > about > 200 MB of space on my ext3 filesystem. RHL 8.0 on an 1GHz Duron with > 384MB > RAM. > > And yes, that /windows/C drive looks mighty full.