On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 22:05:09 -0400
Matthew Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So please share your personal biases and thanks a load!
> Remember, it needs to be platform-agnostic, so Web seems most fitting,
> Java works too. Heck, I'd settle for a Win32 app since I already have a
> great Li
Folks,
I have a Ricoh Caplio G3 and when I plug it in I get the following in
/var/log/messages.
Oct 8 20:57:43 amd kernel: hub.c: new USB device 00:10.0-2, assigned
address 2
Oct 8 20:57:43 amd kernel: usb.c: USB device 2 (vend/prod 0x5ca/0x2204)
is not claimed by any active driver.
Oct 8 2
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
> Testing new backup procedures on one of my machines, I kept locking up half-way
> through, consistently. This last time, I got a kernel Oops (happened to be watching
> it through a serial connection so I was able to save it).
>
> I'm pretty sure it'
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, M.W. Chang wrote:
> what did I miss? is there a how-to on this?
>
> cc -c -O2 -Wall -g -DLILO=0x489b `( if [ -r $ROOT/etc/lilo.defines
> ]; then cat $ROOT/etc/lilo.defines; else echo -DBDATA -DDSECS=3 -DEVMS
> -DIGNORECASE -DLVM -DONE_SHOT -DPASS160 -DREISERFS -DREWRITE_TABL
I am installing Frontpage extenstion on Redhat 9 with apache 1.3.28, and get
the following error:
Creating web http://.
./fp_install.sh: line 2237: 5544 Segmentation fault
${FPDIR}/bin/owsadm.exe -o install -p $port $web $config -u $admin $chown -m
""
ERROR: / installation failed.
Hit enter to c
Folks,
I have a Ricoh Caplio G3 and when I plug it in I get the following in
/var/log/messages.
Oct 8 20:57:43 amd kernel: hub.c: new USB device 00:10.0-2, assigned
address 2
Oct 8 20:57:43 amd kernel: usb.c: USB device 2 (vend/prod 0x5ca/0x2204)
is not claimed by any active driver.
Oct 8 20:57
I'm pretty sold on DirectoryAdministrator for Linux
- Original Message -
From: "Roger Oberholtzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 3:55 AM
Subject: Re: LDAP AddressBook Web Front End
> On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 22:05:09 -0400
> Matthew Carpenter <[
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Vu Pham wrote:
> I am installing Frontpage extenstion on Redhat 9 with apache 1.3.28, and get
> the following error:
>
> Creating web http://.
> ./fp_install.sh: line 2237: 5544 Segmentation fault
> ${FPDIR}/bin/owsadm.exe -o install -p $port $web $config -u $admin $chown -m
>
Is there a theoretical or functional maximum memory you can put in a
Linux machine? I have a server with 2GB installed but the free command
stubbornly says:
# free
total used free sharedbuffers
cached
Mem:902768 672416 230352 0 45820
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Simper, Brian D wrote:
>
> Is there a theoretical or functional maximum memory you can put in a
> Linux machine? I have a server with 2GB installed but the free command
> stubbornly says:
>
> # free
> total used free sharedbuffers
> cached
> Mem
Yes, but most stock kernels support up to 4GB, which is still more than 2GB
this guy's using...
- Original Message -
From: "Net Llama!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: Maximum Memory in Linux
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Simper
Brian Simper wrote:
Is there a theoretical or functional maximum memory you can put in a
Linux machine? I have a server with 2GB installed but the free command
stubbornly says:
# free
total used free shared buffers
cached
Mem: 902768 672416 230352
Simper, Brian D wrote:
Is there a theoretical or functional maximum memory you can put in a
Linux machine? I have a server with 2GB installed but the free command
stubbornly says:
At risk of suggesting the obvious, does your BIOS recognize all the
memory? Some machines have built-in hardware limi
The 'stock' Redhat kernel suports no more than 1GB. SuSE kernels might
support more. Redhat includes a 'bigmem' kernel which supports 16GB.
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
> Yes, but most stock kernels support up to 4GB, which is still more than 2GB
> this guy's using...
>
> -
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 08:44:51 -0700
"Simper, Brian D" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there a theoretical or functional maximum memory you can put in a
> Linux machine? I have a server with 2GB installed but the free
> command stubbornly says:
>
> # free
> total used fr
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 16:59:57 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The 'stock' Redhat kernel suports no more than 1GB. SuSE kernels
> might support more. Redhat includes a 'bigmem' kernel which supports
> 16GB.
kernels support up to:
1Gb, 4Gb, 64Gb depending on the kernel compile o
Really? Wow. UL support 4GB out of the box. UL includes both CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G as
well as CONFIG_1GB. I know there is also an option for 64GB.
(from /usr/src/linux/Documentation/Configure.help)
4GB
CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G
Select this if you have
If you can follow this conversation, could someone tell me why the file
'wx-config' immediately becomes an orphan as soon as it is installed?
What am I missing THIS time?
# ls /usr/bin/wx-config
/usr/bin/wx-config
# rpm -e wxGTK-devel-2.4.2-1 wxGTK-2.4.2-1
# ls /usr/bin/wx-config
ls: /usr/bin/wx
Before you go re-rolling kernels, check this out:
http://kb.redhat.com/view.php?eid=71
--
burns
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
James McDonald wrote:
"Could you guys recommend a website for all things Linux and digital
camera wise?"
Thanks.
http://www.linux-usb.org/
--
Ken
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/ma
James McDonald wrote:
Folks,
I have a Ricoh Caplio G3 and when I plug it in I get the following in
/var/log/messages.
Oct 8 20:57:43 amd kernel: hub.c: new USB device 00:10.0-2, assigned
address 2
Oct 8 20:57:43 amd kernel: usb.c: USB device 2 (vend/prod
0x5ca/0x2204) is not claimed by any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Hipp wrote:
| If you can follow this conversation, could someone tell me why the file
| 'wx-config' immediately becomes an orphan as soon as it is installed?
| What am I missing THIS time?
|
| # ls /usr/bin/wx-config
| /usr/bin/wx-config
| # rpm
http://www.teaser.fr/~hfiguiere/linux/digicam.html
states "seems to not work as is"
You might try a very new kernel.
2.5. or 2.6.0
--
Ken
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/lis
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Simper, Brian D wrote:
Is there a theoretical or functional maximum memory you can put in a
Linux machine? I have a server with 2GB installed but the free command
stubbornly says:
# CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM is not set
CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y
# CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not set
The st
anyone home?
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Andrew Mathews wrote:
Sounds like your rpm isn't built for the distro you're trying to install
it on, but something altogether different. Can you properly query the
package with rpm -qpl and list the fileset?
It's the RPM that came in RH9 as far as I know. I don't recall upgrading
it unless it ca
Ken Moffat wrote:
James McDonald wrote:
Folks,
I have a Ricoh Caplio G3 and when I plug it in I get the following in
/var/log/messages.
Oct 8 20:57:43 amd kernel: hub.c: new USB device 00:10.0-2, assigned
address 2
Oct 8 20:57:43 amd kernel: usb.c: USB device 2 (vend/prod
0x5ca/0x2204) is
First off, what Linux distro are you using, and secondly, do you need 2.4.2 or would
2.4.0 work?
If you are running SuSE, check out:
http://packman.links2linux.de/?action=312
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 17:46:23 -0500
Michael Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you can follow this conversation, could
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Vu Pham wrote:
> I am installing Frontpage extenstion on Redhat 9 with apache 1.3.28, and get
> the following error:
>
> Creating web http://.
> ./fp_install.sh: line 2237: 5544 Segmentation fault
> ${FPDIR}/bin/owsadm.exe -o install -p $port $web $config -u $admin $chown -m
Home office... That count?
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 18:32:11 -0500
ronnie gauthier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> anyone home?
> ___
> Linux-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/lin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Hipp wrote:
| Andrew Mathews wrote:
|
|> Sounds like your rpm isn't built for the distro you're trying to install
|> it on, but something altogether different. Can you properly query the
|> package with rpm -qpl and list the fileset?
|
|
| It's
James McDonald wrote:
What kernel are you running?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] boot]$ uname -r
2.4.22
Pretty new. Thought you might have an old one and could update.
--
Ken
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://smt
I was reading this article on greylisting and I find the premise to be interesting.
http://projects.puremagic.com/greylisting/
Has anyone tried greylisting? Any experiences worth sharing?
Regards,
Wil McGilvery
Manager
Lynch Digital Media Inc
416-744-7949
416-716-3964 (cell)
1-866-3
I just found an interesting twist to my recent php woes.
I have been attempting to get squirrelmail working using a named virtual host,
webmail.eisgr.com, which is actually pointing at /srv/www/htdocs/squirrelmail/. It
sends me the index.php file as text seemingly no matter what I do.
However,
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 18:25:36 -0500 Michael Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could somebody tell me what I'm doing wrong, or is RPM a Microsoft
> conspiracy to make Linux look bad:
>
I love it! Will file this away. RPM, like any other software product, has
syntax that must be learned. That b
No, but I'll be looking into it as soon as the schedule lets up next week.
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 21:54:33 -0400
"Wil McGilvery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> projects
--
Matthew Carpenter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.eisgr.com/
Enterprise Information Systems
* Network Se
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 21:54:33 -0400
"Wil McGilvery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was reading this article on greylisting and I find the premise to be
> interesting.
>
> http://projects.puremagic.com/greylisting/
>
> Has anyone tried greylisting? Any experiences worth sharing?
>
No. But the mo
Quoth ronnie gauthier:
>
>
> anyone home?
No. I'm at work.
Kurt
--
It is the business of little minds to shrink.
-- Carl Sandburg
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mail
Quoth Michael Hipp:
> If you can follow this conversation, could someone tell me why the file
> 'wx-config' immediately becomes an orphan as soon as it is installed?
> What am I missing THIS time?
Is wx-config a symlink to another file that *is* installed by
the RPM?
Kurt
--
It is easier to ch
Quoth Michael Hipp:
> Andrew Mathews wrote:
> >Sounds like your rpm isn't built for the distro you're trying to install
> >it on, but something altogether different. Can you properly query the
> >package with rpm -qpl and list the fileset?
>
> It's the RPM that came in RH9 as far as I know. I don
quoth Rick Sivernell:
| DEP your right that if no print she will not be totally happy.
|
| Good news here - last weekend we had our 1st Sat computer sale. I
| bought 2 scsi HP6100c scanners for $5.00 total. I have one on wife's
| machine and suse setit up and scanned.
wait a minute here. i thou
Kurt Wall wrote:
I'm betting that a %post-install script creates a symlink. Perhaps
a command like "rpm -q --scripts pkg.name.rpm" (if memory serves)
will tell you what you want to know? You're looking for a command
that creates a symlink. It's been awhile since I was intimate with
RPM, but symlink
Andrew Mathews wrote:
Sorry, I wasn't clear, I meant the package you're trying to install, not
rpm itself.
It's not Red Hat specific in any way, but I've been using the slightly
earlier version with no problems. And, in fact, this one is working fine
now. Whereas yesterday bash kept telling me it
Does anyone know of a way to import addresses from a text file like mutt
aliases into a more convoluted file like the abook of mozilla?
Or,failing that, is there a simple explanation somewhere of the abook
data format?
Thanks,
Joel
___
Linux-users mail
Matthew Carpenter wrote:
First off, what Linux distro are you using, and secondly, do you need 2.4.2 or would 2.4.0 work?
If you are running SuSE, check out:
http://packman.links2linux.de/?action=312
It's Red Hat 9. I've been running 2.4.1 with no problems but thought to
upgrade to 2.4.2 as it i
Quoth Michael Hipp:
> Kurt Wall wrote:
> >I'm betting that a %post-install script creates a symlink. Perhaps
> >a command like "rpm -q --scripts pkg.name.rpm" (if memory serves)
> >will tell you what you want to know? You're looking for a command
> >that creates a symlink. It's been awhile since I
Quoth Joel Hammer:
> Does anyone know of a way to import addresses from a text file like mutt
> aliases into a more convoluted file like the abook of mozilla?
> Or,failing that, is there a simple explanation somewhere of the abook
> data format?
http://www.mozilla.org/mailnews/arch/index.html
K
No, it's most likely because the link is "created" during a "post-install" script, not
listed in the "official file list" which RPM uses to populate its database.
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:02:52 -0400
Kurt Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoth Michael Hipp:
> > Kurt Wall wrote:
> > >I'm betting t
48 matches
Mail list logo