Re: (day four) - your opinion on the new design needed

2002-04-06 Thread Marvin Dickens
> I agree. Font should be Verdana/Arial/Helvetica/Sans Serif/etc. Why don't we just go for a nice code 39 or perhaps interleaved 2 of 5? Now that I think about it, internationalization is a big issue seeing as people from all over the world use the SxS. We really should use code 128. Best Pe

Re: (day four) - your opinion on the new design needed

2002-04-06 Thread Marvin Dickens
> Net Llama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David A. Bandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kurt Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Roger Oberholtzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Something about caffine and sex... Personally I like them both... The latter much more than the former ;-) Best Marvin Dick

Re: Re: (day four) - your opinion on the new design needed

2002-04-05 Thread Tom Wilson
On Friday 05 April 2002 4 16:37 pm, David A. Bandel's voice rose above the ones in my head and declared: > > > > Anyone going to Starbucks doesn't really appreciate good coffee > > anyway. > > Starbucks isn't real coffee. Oh so true. We got a little coffee house down the street. They have

Re: Re: (day four) - your opinion on the new design needed

2002-04-05 Thread Net Llama
--- "David A. Bandel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In all seriousness, i don't drink caffeine or alcohol. > > Chuleta, the only thing left is sex! Is anything with a skirt safe > around > you? Ask my wife. = Lonni J. Friedman

Re: Re: (day four) - your opinion on the new design needed

2002-04-05 Thread David A. Bandel
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 09:12:29 -0800 (PST) begin Net Llama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed forth: [snip] > > > Anyone going to Starbucks doesn't really appreciate good coffee anyway. > Starbucks isn't real coffee. > > In all seriousness, i don't drink caffeine or alcohol. Chuleta, the only thing

Re: (day four) - your opinion on the new design needed

2002-04-05 Thread Net Llama
--- Michael Scottaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 4 Apr 2002 22:27:37 -0500 > burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled intuitively: > > >On April 4, 2002 02:28 pm, Rick McQueen-Thomson wrote: > >> FWIW, I like the new design. I think Tux looks too studious. I > still > >> think he needs

Re: (day four) - your opinion on the new design needed

2002-04-05 Thread Net Llama
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 06:52:36 -0500 > Kurt Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Scribbling feverishly on April 04, burns managed to emit: > > > On April 4, 2002 02:28 pm, Rick McQueen-Thomson wrote: > > > > FWIW, I like the new design. I think Tux looks too studious. > I > > > > still think he

Re: (day four) - your opinion on the new design needed

2002-04-05 Thread Klaus-Peter Schrage
Also sprach Douglas J Hunley on Thursday 04 April 2002 15:19: > Today's changes include: > 1. A new font (for those who have it installed) .Screenshot is attached for > those without the font. Please comment on the new font. Only a suggestion: If you want a nice font for the items in the upper an

Re: (day four) - your opinion on the new design needed

2002-04-05 Thread Douglas J Hunley
On Thursday 04 April 2002 12:33, Aaron Grewell wrote: > I prefer more "conservative" fonts, preferably something sans-serif without > any strange cuves. OTOH, since my spanky new KDE3 setup doesn't have that > font, it looks fine on my machine! :-) I'll ditch the new font... thanks! -- Douglas

Re: (day four) - your opinion on the new design needed

2002-04-05 Thread Kurt Wall
Scribbling feverishly on April 05, Roger Oberholtzer managed to emit: [...] Which isn't to say that Starbucks makes good coffee -- they don't. > Glad to report the total absence of Starbucks in this country. I > could just hear the Italian guy down the block laugh when I ask > for either a 'ski

Re: (day four) - your opinion on the new design needed

2002-04-05 Thread Kurt Wall
Scribbling feverishly on April 05, Michael Scottaline managed to emit: > On Thu, 4 Apr 2002 22:27:37 -0500 > burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled intuitively: > > >On April 4, 2002 02:28 pm, Rick McQueen-Thomson wrote: > >> FWIW, I like the new design. I think Tux looks too studious. I still >

Re: (day four) - your opinion on the new design needed

2002-04-05 Thread Roger Oberholtzer
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 06:52:36 -0500 Kurt Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Scribbling feverishly on April 04, burns managed to emit: > > On April 4, 2002 02:28 pm, Rick McQueen-Thomson wrote: > > > FWIW, I like the new design. I think Tux looks too studious. I > > > still think he needs to be s

Re: (day four) - your opinion on the new design needed

2002-04-05 Thread Michael Scottaline
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002 22:27:37 -0500 burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled intuitively: >On April 4, 2002 02:28 pm, Rick McQueen-Thomson wrote: >> FWIW, I like the new design. I think Tux looks too studious. I still >> think he needs to be sipping on a daiquiri or a Planter's Punch as well >> as r

Re: (day four) - your opinion on the new design needed

2002-04-05 Thread Kurt Wall
Scribbling feverishly on April 04, burns managed to emit: > On April 4, 2002 02:28 pm, Rick McQueen-Thomson wrote: > > FWIW, I like the new design. I think Tux looks too studious. I still > > think he needs to be sipping on a daiquiri or a Planter's Punch as well as > > reading. > > Or a beer

Re: (day four) - your opinion on the new design needed

2002-04-04 Thread Roger Oberholtzer
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002 07:59:51 -0700 Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 4 Apr 2002 22:27:37 -0500 burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote:> On April 4, 2002 02:28 pm, Rick McQueen-Thomson wrote: > > > FWIW, I like the new design. I think Tux looks too studious. I > > > still think he needs t

Re: (day four) - your opinion on the new design needed

2002-04-04 Thread Collins
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002 22:27:37 -0500 burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> On April 4, 2002 02:28 pm, Rick McQueen-Thomson wrote: > > FWIW, I like the new design. I think Tux looks too studious. I > > still think he needs to be sipping on a daiquiri or a Planter's > > Punch as well as reading. > > >

Re: (day four) - your opinion on the new design needed

2002-04-04 Thread Net Llama
--- burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On April 4, 2002 12:47 pm, Net Llama wrote: > > Well, i'm more of a Serif font kinda-guy. Helvetica, Arial and the > > like. > > > Err, ahem... Arial and Helvetica are Sans-serif fonts, Lonni. Yea, i always get them confused. =

Re: (day four) - your opinion on the new design needed

2002-04-04 Thread burns
On April 4, 2002 02:28 pm, Rick McQueen-Thomson wrote: > FWIW, I like the new design. I think Tux looks too studious. I still > think he needs to be sipping on a daiquiri or a Planter's Punch as well as > reading. > Or a beer. Noted. -- burns ___

Re: (day four) - your opinion on the new design needed

2002-04-04 Thread burns
On April 4, 2002 12:47 pm, Net Llama wrote: > Well, i'm more of a Serif font kinda-guy. Helvetica, Arial and the > like. > Err, ahem... Arial and Helvetica are Sans-serif fonts, Lonni. -- burns ___ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.or

Re: (day four) - your opinion on the new design needed

2002-04-04 Thread Federico Voges
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I agree. Font should be Verdana/Arial/Helvetica/Sans Serif/etc. On Thu, 4 Apr 2002 23:47:27 +0200 (CEST), patrick Kapturkiewicz wrote: >I don't like this font, too difficult to read,imho. >Patrick > > --- Douglas J Hunley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a

Re: (day four) - your opinion on the new design needed

2002-04-04 Thread patrick Kapturkiewicz
I don't like this font, too difficult to read,imho. Patrick --- Douglas J Hunley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > Another 'snapshot' of the developing site redesign > is now up at > http://hunley.homeip.net/sxs/ for review. > Today's changes include: > 1. A new font (for those who have it instal

Re: (day four) - your opinion on the new design needed

2002-04-04 Thread David A. Bandel
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002 09:47:46 -0800 (PST) begin Net Llama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed forth: > Well, i'm more of a Serif font kinda-guy. Helvetica, Arial and the > like. Umm. San-serif mean without the "serif", which is a "tail" on all the letter termination points. Helvetica and Arial are san-s

Re: (day four) - your opinion on the new design needed

2002-04-04 Thread Rick McQueen-Thomson
FWIW, I like the new design. I think Tux looks too studious. I still think he needs to be sipping on a daiquiri or a Planter's Punch as well as reading. Great site otherwise. Cheers, Rick On Thu, 4 Apr 2002 23:19, you wrote: > Another 'snapshot' of the developing site redesign is now up at

Re: (day four) - your opinion on the new design needed

2002-04-04 Thread Aaron Grewell
kidding. It actually isn't a big deal for me at all. On Thursday 04 April 2002 10:54 am, Net Llama wrote: > How so? > > --- Aaron Grewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sacrilege! > > > > On Thursday 04 April 2002 09:47 am, Net Llama wrote: > > > Well, i'm more of a Serif font kinda-guy. Helvet

Re: (day four) - your opinion on the new design needed

2002-04-04 Thread Net Llama
How so? --- Aaron Grewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sacrilege! > > On Thursday 04 April 2002 09:47 am, Net Llama wrote: > > Well, i'm more of a Serif font kinda-guy. Helvetica, Arial and the > > like. > > > > --- Aaron Grewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I prefer more "conservative" fon

Re: (day four) - your opinion on the new design needed

2002-04-04 Thread Aaron Grewell
Sacrilege! On Thursday 04 April 2002 09:47 am, Net Llama wrote: > Well, i'm more of a Serif font kinda-guy. Helvetica, Arial and the > like. > > --- Aaron Grewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I prefer more "conservative" fonts, preferably something sans-serif > > without > > any strange cuves.

Re: (day four) - your opinion on the new design needed

2002-04-04 Thread Net Llama
Well, i'm more of a Serif font kinda-guy. Helvetica, Arial and the like. --- Aaron Grewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I prefer more "conservative" fonts, preferably something sans-serif > without > any strange cuves. OTOH, since my spanky new KDE3 setup doesn't have > that > font, it looks

Re: (day four) - your opinion on the new design needed

2002-04-04 Thread Aaron Grewell
I prefer more "conservative" fonts, preferably something sans-serif without any strange cuves. OTOH, since my spanky new KDE3 setup doesn't have that font, it looks fine on my machine! :-) On Thursday 04 April 2002 09:09 am, Net Llama wrote: > --- Douglas J Hunley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: (day four) - your opinion on the new design needed

2002-04-04 Thread Net Llama
--- Douglas J Hunley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another 'snapshot' of the developing site redesign is now up at > http://hunley.homeip.net/sxs/ for review. > Today's changes include: > 1. A new font (for those who have it installed) .Screenshot is > attached for > those without the font. Pleas