On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 20:10:54 -0700
Collins Richey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 20:19:44 -0600
> Rick Sivernell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Collins - Slack 9.0 EXT3
> >
> >I thought you were a Gentoo guy. What this slack 9.0 stuff
> >
> >
>
> I am, but I like to exp
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 18:19:51 -0700
Collins Richey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 16:10:44 -0800
> Aaron Grewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > > At least now the global community is waking up and asking; Why do we
> > > have to upgrade every two years?
> >
> > Of course,
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 20:19:44 -0600
Rick Sivernell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Collins - Slack 9.0 EXT3
>
>I thought you were a Gentoo guy. What this slack 9.0 stuff
>
>
I am, but I like to experiment with other distros as well. The current
Slack offering is arguably the finest right alon
Collins - Slack 9.0 EXT3
I thought you were a Gentoo guy. What this slack 9.0 stuff
cheers
--
Rick Sivernell
Dallas, Texas 75287
972 306-2296
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Caldera Open Linux eWorkStation 3.1.1
Registered Linux User
.~.
/ v \
/( _ )\
^ ^
In Linux we trust!
___
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 16:10:44 -0800
Aaron Grewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > At least now the global community is waking up and asking; Why do we
> > have to upgrade every two years?
>
> Of course, then one has to ask Red Hat why we have to upgrade every
> year as well,
And who needs RedH
> At least now the global community is waking up and asking; Why do we
> have to upgrade every two years?
Of course, then one has to ask Red Hat why we have to upgrade every year as
well, as their patch support for non-Enterprise versions is now only a year.
Linux as a whole (certainl
Seth Johnson (by way of Douglas J Hunley) wrote:
Eben Moglen is professor of law at Columbia University Law School. He serves
without fee as General Counsel of the Free Software Foundation. You can read
more of his writing at moglen.law.columbia.edu
Everytime I read an article by proponents of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> http://www.linuxuser.co.uk/articles/issue27/lud27-free_software_matters.htm
>l
Microsoftens
By Eben Moglen
Eben Moglen is professor of law at Columbia University Law School. He serves
without fee as General Counsel of the Free Software Foun
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We would like to invite you to be a founding members of the FSC either as a
Consultant and/or an Agent.
http://www.fsc.cc
In the main page you will find links to subscribe as consultant and/or agent.
Free Software Consortium is a multinational
Ah, the famous "sniff of fools", sails again.
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 16:12:33 +0800
"m.w.chang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>no way, mon ami. besidse, sniff, not smoke. will inhale better.
>
>ronnie gauthier wrote:
>> Send me some of that shit you're smoking.
>>>"insesant wisecraks"? what the hack
ok, this stuff should do it:
Virtual Keyboard:
http://www.canesta.com/videos/keyboard.asf
http://www.canesta.com/chipset.htm
ronnie gauthier wrote:
> Send me some of that shit you're smoking.
--
Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. .~. In Linux we trust.
/ v \
n
no way, mon ami. besidse, sniff, not smoke. will inhale better.
ronnie gauthier wrote:
> Send me some of that shit you're smoking.
>>"insesant wisecraks"? what the hack is that? doens't seem to be
>>english. oh.. I never knew the "Love is with UL now" was a rumour.
>>sorry about that.
--
Swi
Send me some of that shit you're smoking.
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 15:36:27 +0800
"m.w.chang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>"insesant wisecraks"? what the hack is that? doens't seem to be
>english. oh.. I never knew the "Love is with UL now" was a rumour.
>sorry about that.
>
>Isn't UL more related t
"insesant wisecraks"? what the hack is that? doens't seem to be english.
oh.. I never knew the "Love is with UL now" was a rumour. sorry about that.
Isn't UL more related to electricity? it's on the back my power supply,
and my monitor. :)
>> Do you understand that Ransom Love IS NOT A PART
Jim Bonnet wrote:
> m.w.chang wrote:
>
>>
>> Mr. Love and his comrades offending another bunch of people after
>> freeloaders?
>>
>> http://www.lwn.net/Articles/10257/
>>
> With all do respect-
> Do you understand that Ransom Love IS NOT A PART OF UNITED LINUX AT ALL?
> Why make statements when
Jim Bonnet wrote:
>
> m.w.chang wrote:
>
> >Snip
> > Mr. Love and his comrades offending another bunch of people after
> > freeloaders?
> >
> > http://www.lwn.net/Articles/10257/
> >
> Further my .02$- The author needed to do some more research and checking:
>
> 1) Get a spell checker
>
>
>
On Thursday 19 September 2002 08:22 am, you wrote:
> Further so we don't start spreading FUD, The UL Closed Beta WAS
> distributed like ANY other version of Linux, with 2 CD's and one sources
> CD.
>
> Further my .02$- The author needed to do some more research and checking:
>
> 1) Get a spell che
m.w.chang wrote:
>
> Mr. Love and his comrades offending another bunch of people after
> freeloaders?
>
> http://www.lwn.net/Articles/10257/
>
With all do respect-
Do you understand that Ransom Love IS NOT A PART OF UNITED LINUX AT ALL?
Why make statements when you obviously don't know the fact
Mr. Love and his comrades offending another bunch of people after
freeloaders?
http://www.lwn.net/Articles/10257/
--
Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. .~. In Linux we trust.
/ v \
news://news.hkpcug.org /( _ )\ http://www.linux-sxs.org
On Fri, 24 May 2002 01:47:29 -0700 Net Llama! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> http://www.linuxjournal.com//article.php?sid=5817
>
> Of note is the comment on how XFS performance far outshines extX &
> Reiser.
>
It's amazing how a journaling fs can outperform one that doesn't. Seems to
me that the
http://www.linuxjournal.com//article.php?sid=5817
Of note is the comment on how XFS performance far outshines extX & Reiser.
--
~
L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo:
On April 5, 2002 12:18 pm, Net Llama wrote:
> Burns,
> Have you or David considered sumitting this to /. for greater exposure?
>
> -L
Thanks Lonni,
Actually it just hit front page on the Linux Journal website (this weekend).
It was picked up by Don Marti. I think /. probably are aware of it no
Burns,
Have you or David considered sumitting this to /. for greater exposure?
-L
--- burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The following forwarded message outlines David Skoll's (of Roaring
> Penguin.com and author of the standard PPOE DSL interface) plea for
> assistance in his battle against t
The following forwarded message outlines David Skoll's (of Roaring
Penguin.com and author of the standard PPOE DSL interface) plea for
assistance in his battle against the CAAT organization's tactics. CAAT is a
coalition of large proprietary corporations, led by Microsoft, That have
started to
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002 10:30:33 -0500
"Wil McGilvery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just in case anyone is interested, Netmax is offering their server products free
> of charge for versions 3.0 and 3.1. They include file servers. Web servers and
> VPN/Firewall servers.
>
> www.netmax.com
>
>
> Reg
Just in case anyone is interested, Netmax is offering their server products free of
charge for versions 3.0 and 3.1. They include file servers. Web servers and
VPN/Firewall servers.
www.netmax.com
Regards,
Wil McGilvery
Manager, Digital Media
Lynch Technologies Inc.
416-744-7191
1-888-62
26 matches
Mail list logo
