Re: Telnet port change

2003-10-16 Thread Ben Duncan
yes, YOU CAN ran a telnet securely . It's called using tcp wrappers. Now, granted, passwords are in the clear, BUT, if the server side can support it, and the client side has it (linux to linux) then there is the Kerbros authentication, and the "-x " data stream encryption. If you are talking

Re: Telnet port change

2003-10-16 Thread Andrew Mathews
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Swapana Ghosh wrote: | Hi | | One of our client is very much stick to use the telnet in | their server. But for security purpose we are trying to convince them, | but failed. | So if we change the telnet port and ask them to use - is it

Re: Telnet port change

2003-10-16 Thread James McDonald
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:38:19 -0700 (PDT) > Swapana Ghosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> One of our client is very much stick to use the telnet in >> their server. But for security purpose we are trying to convince them, >> but failed. >> So if we change the telnet port

Re: Telnet port change

2003-10-16 Thread Michael Hipp
Swapana Ghosh wrote: Hi One of our client is very much stick to use the telnet in their server. But for security purpose we are trying to convince them, but failed. So if we change the telnet port and ask them to use - is it ok? I am asking for security level only... That won't

RE: Telnet port change

2003-10-16 Thread Wil McGilvery
Telnet is not secure. There are programs you can buy that claim to secure telnet. The easiest answer is ssh. Regards, Wil McGilvery Manager Lynch Digital Media Inc 416-744-7949 416-716-3964 (cell) 1-866-314-4678 416-744-0406  FAX www.LynchDigital.com -Original Message- Fro

Re: Telnet port change

2003-10-16 Thread David A. Bandel
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:38:19 -0700 (PDT) Swapana Ghosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > One of our client is very much stick to use the telnet in > their server. But for security purpose we are trying to convince them, > but failed. > So if we change the telnet port and ask t