On Wednesday 01 October 2003 12:05 am, Joel Hammer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 07:24:38PM -0400, Jerry McBride wrote:
NFS literally drove me nuts. Best bet sofar, if you can stand the
permissions mangling is switching to samba. You'll be impressed with the
speed of samba 3.0 compared
I mounted a drive on a server via samba on a client (/mnt/Backup) .
I then changed smb.conf on the server to reference a different path, and
now my client complains that there is a stale NFS handle on /mnt/Backup.
Is there a way to fix this problem without rebooting?
Thanks,
Joel
Quoth Joel Hammer:
I mounted a drive on a server via samba on a client (/mnt/Backup) .
I then changed smb.conf on the server to reference a different path, and
now my client complains that there is a stale NFS handle on /mnt/Backup.
Is there a way to fix this problem without rebooting
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 10:49 pm, Joel Hammer wrote:
I mounted a drive on a server via samba on a client (/mnt/Backup) .
I then changed smb.conf on the server to reference a different path, and
now my client complains that there is a stale NFS handle on /mnt/Backup.
Is there a way to fix
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 07:24:38PM -0400, Jerry McBride wrote:
NFS literally drove me nuts. Best bet sofar, if you can stand the permissions
mangling is switching to samba. You'll be impressed with the speed of samba
3.0 compared to NFS any version.
I was using samba, not NFS, when
I'm having a wierd problem at one of our customer's sites. The system has
multiple IP addresses bound to one NIC, eth0 and eth0:[0-3]. NFS clients
can't mount NFS directories because the UDP replies are coming from
addresses other than eth0.
I've looked at the source for mountd.c, and there's
Greets Bill,
--- Bill Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having a wierd problem at one of our customer's sites.
The system has
multiple IP addresses bound to one NIC, eth0 and eth0:[0-3].
NFS clients
can't mount NFS directories because the UDP replies are coming
from
addresses other
Quoth Bill Campbell:
I'm having a wierd problem at one of our customer's sites. The system has
multiple IP addresses bound to one NIC, eth0 and eth0:[0-3]. NFS clients
can't mount NFS directories because the UDP replies are coming from
addresses other than eth0.
Would this be what is known
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003 10:06:16 -0400
Kurt Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, list,
Does anyone know of open source implementations of an NFS client for
Windows 2K or XP besides something that might be available for Cygwin?
I'm aware of some commercial ones (Labtam's, for instance
Rick Sivernell wrote:
Kurt
I beleive that it is in Win2k, or the ability to perform the task. I have a
win2k box that has read nfs from both solaris the old caldera linux look at
the property box on the selected drive in winders.
cheers
No, its not there by default. I think the Resource
An unnamed Administration source, Shawn L Johnston, wrote:
Rick Sivernell wrote:
Kurt
I beleive that it is in Win2k, or the ability to perform the task. I
have a
win2k box that has read nfs from both solaris the old caldera linux
look at
the property box on the selected
Feigning erudition, Jason Joines wrote:
% I'm trying to get NFS to work through my firewall without much
% luck. Portmap and NFS stay on dedicated ports but all those RPC
% processes (statd, mountd, etc.) keep changing port numbers. Is there
% any way to make these stick to a specific
I'm trying to get NFS to work through my firewall without much
luck. Portmap and NFS stay on dedicated ports but all those RPC
processes (statd, mountd, etc.) keep changing port numbers. Is there
any way to make these stick to a specific port?
Thanks,
Jason Joines
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Keith,
Check to make sure:
1. portmapper is running on all systems (server and client)
2. that portmapper started before your rpc.xxx functions got called
try this:
rpcinfo -p (this command may not be found on some distros)
you should see nfs
systems (server and client)
2. that portmapper started before your rpc.xxx functions got called
try this:
rpcinfo -p (this command may not be found on some distros)
you should see nfs and mountd anyway. If portmapper is started after the
programs it needs to track it won't know about them.
On Sun
Hello List,
I am running a home lan of mixed linux/windoze boxen. My server is a pure
SuSE 7.2 with seperate partitions for /home and /public. I was trying to
back up the information using BRU personal v17.0 (it kept hanging), in
preparation for upgrading the server to SuSE 8.0. Prior to doing
/exports
#
/ spyro(rw,no_root_squash,insecure)
/ sid(rw,no_root_squash,insecure)
This allows user sid and spyro to nfs mount the server root with no security.
Cheers and good luck.
--
**
Registered Linux
\
/cdrom \mnt\cdrom
You're not stating any options in the exported resources, are you sure the
defaults are correct?
On my private lan, my server has:
#/etc/exports
#
/ spyro(rw,no_root_squash,insecure)
/ sid(rw,no_root_squash,insecure)
This allows user sid and spyro to nfs mount the server root
Had to arrange the file to put it in th right sequence:
/public/
192.168.x.x/255.255.255.x(rw)
This fixed it.
Regards,
Keith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello List,
I am running a home lan of mixed linux/windoze boxen. My server is a pure
SuSE 7.2 with seperate partitions for /home and /public.
(this is more theoretical knowledge than experiencial, so correct me if
I'm wrong)
Basically, NFS is one of those odd occurrences of poorly
designed security in Unix. Functionality, however, is generally very
nice if done right. Notice the quote below that neither Users or Hosts
are easily
bad, but NFS is one of the more common network aware file systems.
--
**
Registered Linux User Number 185956
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=ensafe=offgroup=linux
Join me
wireless, and
that isn't a lot of security anyway.
It's pretty bad, but NFS is one of the more common network aware file systems.
NFS Security isn't great, but it's orders of magnitude better than what
passes for security on Windows systems (it would be better if people knew
there's no security
and there is no free NFS clients for window$? if there is a client for
WIndows, I could drop samba,
Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
Depends. With windows machines you need Samba (unless they have NFS
installed which most don't). NFS is nice for unix/linux to unix/linux but
there are security issues
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002 11:12:27 +0800 m.w.chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and there is no free NFS clients for window$? if there is a client for
WIndows, I could drop samba,
I never found a decent, free NFS for windows. Although there's plenty of
commercial ones available
Hello,
I have two of my boxen on my home net using RH 8, with all the current
updates. Each has nfs, nfslockd, network, xinetd running. On the first
box I can mount my remote server (192.168.1.6, SuSE 7.2) without a hitch. I is using a
Realtek NIC 10/100 card on an RJ45 plug, the second box
Is it better to use samba to share files for LAN?
--
.~.Might, Courage, Vision. In Linux We Trust.
/ v \ http://www.linux-sxs.org
/( _ )\ Linux 2.4.19
^ ^11:45am up 21:36, 1 user, load average: 1.01, 1.02, 1.00
___
Linux-users mailing
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002 11:09:48 +0800 m.w.chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it better to use samba to share files for LAN?
Like everything else... If your lan is totally Linux, then NFS will serve you
very well. You'll find it fast, easy to setup and admin. Although there's
windows utilities
Jerry, what do we need to look out for as far as security goes for NFS
systems? I was of the understanding NFS can have security problems.
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002 11:09:48 +0800 m.w.chang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is it better to use samba to share files for LAN?
Like everything else
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002 00:13:52 -0500 Brett I. Holcomb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Jerry, what do we need to look out for as far as security goes for NFS
systems? I was of the understanding NFS can have security problems.
If it's firewalled, the only security concern is internal. If you open
Hello All,
I have a crazy problem. I am running RH 8 on 3 machines. All from the
personal CD I bought. Only on one machine will it access my SuSE server
using /etc/fstab. The other 2 will _NOT_ and RPC just times out.
the line from fstab looks like this: lnx_fs:/public /lnx_fs nfs defaults
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002 15:10:13 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All,
I have a crazy problem. I am running RH 8 on 3 machines. All from the
personal CD I bought. Only on one machine will it access my SuSE server
using /etc/fstab. The other 2 will _NOT_ and RPC just times out.
Check
Hi All,
Small problem I have an Mdk8.2 installed on a pIII 600/256MB RAM VIA mb. The
hard disk seems to turn off (power save/sleep or something) and the whole
machine doesn't respond to network requests from my other boxes... until I
switch my KVM switch to it and touch a key to wake it
Look at
/etc/sysconfig/apmd
might help with some of your suspend problems
On Friday 14 June 2002 06:59 am, James McDonald wrote:
Hi All,
Small problem I have an Mdk8.2 installed on a pIII 600/256MB RAM VIA mb.
The hard disk seems to turn off (power save/sleep or something) and the
whole
Does anyone have ans SXS for setting up a simple NFS setup so that I can
access files on my other PC across the lan?
A real NFS for Idiots would be what I need.
--
Collins Richey - Denver Area - WWTLRD?
Gentoo_rc6-15 2.4.17 - xfce + sylpheed + mozilla
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 16:55:15 -0700 Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have ans SXS for setting up a simple NFS setup so that I
can access files on my other PC across the lan?
A real NFS for Idiots would be what I need.
oops, I didn't search hard enough on the sxs site
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 17:00:58 -0700
Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 16:55:15 -0700 Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have ans SXS for setting up a simple NFS setup so that I
can access files on my other PC across the lan?
A real NFS for Idiots would
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 20:49:31 -0500 Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 17:00:58 -0700 Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 16:55:15 -0700 Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: Does anyone have ans SXS for setting up a simple NFS setup
so that I can access
Does anyone have ans SXS for setting up a simple NFS setup so that I can
yep, it's on Steps site, and it works(tm).
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests
anyone have ans SXS for setting up a simple NFS setup
so that I can access files on my other PC across the lan?
A real NFS for Idiots would be what I need.
oops, I didn't search hard enough on the sxs site.
If you run a journalling file system, SAMBA will be quite faster
39 matches
Mail list logo
