suse 8.0 pro

2003-09-06 Thread Richard Sivernell
list I have installed the Pro 8.0 version of Sue on a ide hd. on system boot I get l 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02

Re: suse 8.0 pro

2003-09-06 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Saturday 06 September 2003 14:07 pm, Richard Sivernell wrote: list I have installed the Pro 8.0 version of Sue on a ide hd. on system boot I get l 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02

Re: suse 8.0 pro

2003-09-06 Thread Collins Richey
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 13:07:06 -0500 Richard Sivernell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: list I have installed the Pro 8.0 version of Sue on a ide hd. on system boot I get l 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02

Re: suse 8.0 pro

2003-09-06 Thread Richard Sivernell
Bruce It is a Suse 8.0 Pro, I wanted to use grub, but if I did I would be on my own, as per cd install. I will do as you suggest and get back with you. many thanks here -- Rick Sivernell Dallas, Texas 75287 972 306-2296 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux Registered Linux User .~. / v

Re: suse 8.0 pro

2003-09-06 Thread Bill Campbell
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003, Richard Sivernell wrote: Bruce It is a Suse 8.0 Pro, I wanted to use grub, but if I did I would be on my own, as per cd install. I will do as you suggest and get back with you. many thanks here I would strongly recommend updating to SuSE 8.2 Pro. There have been many

Re: suse 8.0 pro

2003-09-06 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Saturday 06 September 2003 14:35 pm, Richard Sivernell wrote: It is a Suse 8.0 Pro, I wanted to use grub, but if I did I would be on my own, as per cd install. I will do as you suggest and get back with you. many thanks here Be on your own?? Gee, I thought you had lots of friends here

Re: suse 8.0 pro

2003-09-06 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Saturday 06 September 2003 16:00 pm, Bill Campbell wrote: I would strongly recommend updating to SuSE 8.2 Pro. There have been many improvements in yast2, and SuSE has been very responsive to feedback from their users so 8.2 is a much better product than 8.0. I agree and disagree

Re: suse 8.0 pro

2003-09-06 Thread Richard Sivernell
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 16:41:40 -0400 Bruce Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 06 September 2003 14:35 pm, Richard Sivernell wrote: It is a Suse 8.0 Pro, I wanted to use grub, but if I did I would be on my own, as per cd install. I will do as you suggest and get back with you

Re: suse 8.0 pro

2003-09-06 Thread burns
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 16:41, Bruce Marshall wrote: Be on your own?? Gee, I thought you had lots of friends here... :-) (not all of them like SuSE tho... :-) I liked Suse until they got in bed with Caldera's weird United Linux consortium. 1) Why is the SCO site down (again)? 2) Given

Re: suse 8.0 pro

2003-09-06 Thread Richard Sivernell
On 06 Sep 2003 18:06:01 -0400 burns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 16:41, Bruce Marshall wrote: Be on your own?? Gee, I thought you had lots of friends here... :-) (not all of them like SuSE tho... :-) I liked Suse until they got in bed with Caldera's weird United

Re: suse 8.0 pro

2003-09-06 Thread burns
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 18:15, Richard Sivernell wrote: Burnsie (?!) Could it be by chance Love, Ransom style. Bingo! Lonesome Love - sounds like a Robert Duval movie doesn't it? I wonder if he escaped from Caldera with a bag of dubloons? -- burns