list
I have installed the Pro 8.0 version of Sue on a ide hd. on system boot I get
l 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02
02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02
02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02
On Saturday 06 September 2003 14:07 pm, Richard Sivernell wrote:
list
I have installed the Pro 8.0 version of Sue on a ide hd. on system
boot I get l 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02
02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02
02 02 02 02 02
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 13:07:06 -0500
Richard Sivernell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
list
I have installed the Pro 8.0 version of Sue on a ide hd. on system
boot I get
l 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02
02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02
Bruce
It is a Suse 8.0 Pro, I wanted to use grub, but if I did I would be on my own,
as per cd install. I will do as you suggest and get back with you. many thanks
here
--
Rick Sivernell
Dallas, Texas 75287
972 306-2296
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
Registered Linux User
.~.
/ v
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003, Richard Sivernell wrote:
Bruce
It is a Suse 8.0 Pro, I wanted to use grub, but if I did I would be on my
own, as per cd install. I will do as you suggest and get back with you.
many thanks here
I would strongly recommend updating to SuSE 8.2 Pro. There have been many
On Saturday 06 September 2003 14:35 pm, Richard Sivernell wrote:
It is a Suse 8.0 Pro, I wanted to use grub, but if I did I would be
on my own, as per cd install. I will do as you suggest and get back
with you. many thanks here
Be on your own?? Gee, I thought you had lots of friends here
On Saturday 06 September 2003 16:00 pm, Bill Campbell wrote:
I would strongly recommend updating to SuSE 8.2 Pro. There have been
many improvements in yast2, and SuSE has been very responsive to
feedback from their users so 8.2 is a much better product than 8.0.
I agree and disagree
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 16:41:40 -0400
Bruce Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 06 September 2003 14:35 pm, Richard Sivernell wrote:
It is a Suse 8.0 Pro, I wanted to use grub, but if I did I would be
on my own, as per cd install. I will do as you suggest and get back
with you
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 16:41, Bruce Marshall wrote:
Be on your own?? Gee, I thought you had lots of friends here... :-)
(not all of them like SuSE tho... :-)
I liked Suse until they got in bed with Caldera's weird United Linux
consortium.
1) Why is the SCO site down (again)?
2) Given
On 06 Sep 2003 18:06:01 -0400
burns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 16:41, Bruce Marshall wrote:
Be on your own?? Gee, I thought you had lots of friends here... :-)
(not all of them like SuSE tho... :-)
I liked Suse until they got in bed with Caldera's weird United
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 18:15, Richard Sivernell wrote:
Burnsie
(?!)
Could it be by chance Love, Ransom style.
Bingo! Lonesome Love - sounds like a Robert Duval movie doesn't it?
I wonder if he escaped from Caldera with a bag of dubloons?
--
burns
11 matches
Mail list logo