Re: Quake...

2001-11-26 Thread Jerry McBride
On Sun, 25 Nov 2001 19:23:34 -0700 Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 25 Nov 2001 20:00:57 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 07:36:45PM -0500, Jerry McBride wrote: I'm a bit sheepish to admit this... but I've just rediscovered QUAKE. It Your

Re: Quake...

2001-11-26 Thread Terence McCarthy
On Monday 26 November 2001 12:24, Jerry McBride wrote: Totally OT, but I'm probably the only living linux afficionado who has never played or dreamed of playing QUAKE. grin Please, what is Quake? Am I missing something? :-)) terence ___ Linux

Quake...

2001-11-25 Thread Jerry McBride
I'm a bit sheepish to admit this... but I've just rediscovered QUAKE. It fails to run on 3.1 due to update glibc, but I've discovered that the old libc5 can be installed from eDesktop 2.40 if you add a --nodeps switch to the command line. I've been quakin' for a couple of hours now

Re: Quake...

2001-11-25 Thread kwall
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 07:36:45PM -0500, Jerry McBride wrote: I'm a bit sheepish to admit this... but I've just rediscovered QUAKE. It Your secret's safe with me. Not. ;-) K ___ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf

Re: Quake...

2001-11-25 Thread Bill Day
just rediscovered QUAKE. It fails to run on 3.1 due to update glibc, but I've discovered that the old libc5 can be installed from eDesktop 2.40 if you add a --nodeps switch to the command line. I've been quakin' for a couple of hours now... no problems with either quake or the rest

Re: Quake...

2001-11-25 Thread Myles Green
On Sun, 25 Nov 2001 19:23:34 -0700 Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 25 Nov 2001 20:00:57 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 07:36:45PM -0500, Jerry McBride wrote: I'm a bit sheepish to admit this... but I've just rediscovered QUAKE. It Your