On Wed, 13 Feb 2002 07:25:21 -0500
Joel Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh boy. It sounds like they are going for nifty features in place of
> what most users really want, no hassles and standardization. It is to be
> hoped that they will supply a patch for 5.x that will allow opening and
>
Oh boy. It sounds like they are going for nifty features in place of
what most users really want, no hassles and standardization. It is to be
hoped that they will supply a patch for 5.x that will allow opening and
saving of documents in the new format. After all, 5.x is very nice, and
maybe a lot
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002 10:22:30 +0100
Roger Oberholtzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled in frustration:
>StarOffice 6 beta is supposed to do Office 2000/xp. That and loosing
>its desktop are the main new features, as far as I can see.
===
And a whole new file system/struct
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002 18:32:29 -0800
Bill Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 07:55:35PM -0600, Michael Hipp wrote:
| >Good summary, Joel. Do you have a copy of OpenOffice handy to try also?
| >
| >Joel Hammer pontificated eloquently:
| >> We got at memo a work today, a 30
I haven't fooled around with OpenOffice yet. I would HOPE they haven't
made things worse as far as the import filters, but, you never know.
Joel
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 07:55:35PM -0600, Michael Hipp wrote:
> Good summary, Joel. Do you have a copy of OpenOffice handy to try also?
>
> Joel Hamme
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 07:55:35PM -0600, Michael Hipp wrote:
>Good summary, Joel. Do you have a copy of OpenOffice handy to try also?
>
>Joel Hammer pontificated eloquently:
>> We got at memo a work today, a 300 word memo in Word that was 45 KB
>> long. It has a small corporate logo on it. I dec
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002 20:35:12 -0500
Joel Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled in frustration:
>BTW, I used staroffice 5.2, not 5.3. I don't know if there is a 5.3.
>Joel
=
was gonna ask about that ;o)
BTW, I'll bet 6.0 will do even better, and .xlm compressed format saves
e
Good summary, Joel. Do you have a copy of OpenOffice handy to try also?
Joel Hammer pontificated eloquently:
> We got at memo a work today, a 300 word memo in Word that was 45 KB
> long. It has a small corporate logo on it. I decided to experiment.
> Using Word97, I saved it in four formats, DOC
BTW, I used staroffice 5.2, not 5.3. I don't know if there is a 5.3.
Joel
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
We got at memo a work today, a 300 word memo in Word that was 45 KB
long. It has a small corporate logo on it. I decided to experiment. Using
Word97, I saved it in four formats, DOC, HTM, RFT, and TXT, with the
following file sizes:
46k .DOC
3.2k .HTM
196k .RTF
2.0k .TXT
So, RTF is the b
10 matches
Mail list logo