Re: Reading Documents with Various editors

2002-02-13 Thread Michael Scottaline
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002 07:25:21 -0500 Joel Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh boy. It sounds like they are going for nifty features in place of > what most users really want, no hassles and standardization. It is to be > hoped that they will supply a patch for 5.x that will allow opening and >

Re: Reading Documents with Various editors

2002-02-13 Thread Joel Hammer
Oh boy. It sounds like they are going for nifty features in place of what most users really want, no hassles and standardization. It is to be hoped that they will supply a patch for 5.x that will allow opening and saving of documents in the new format. After all, 5.x is very nice, and maybe a lot

Re: Reading Documents with Various editors

2002-02-13 Thread Michael Scottaline
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002 10:22:30 +0100 Roger Oberholtzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled in frustration: >StarOffice 6 beta is supposed to do Office 2000/xp. That and loosing >its desktop are the main new features, as far as I can see. === And a whole new file system/struct

Re: Reading Documents with Various editors

2002-02-13 Thread Roger Oberholtzer
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002 18:32:29 -0800 Bill Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 07:55:35PM -0600, Michael Hipp wrote: | >Good summary, Joel. Do you have a copy of OpenOffice handy to try also? | > | >Joel Hammer pontificated eloquently: | >> We got at memo a work today, a 30

Re: Reading Documents with Various editors

2002-02-12 Thread Joel Hammer
I haven't fooled around with OpenOffice yet. I would HOPE they haven't made things worse as far as the import filters, but, you never know. Joel On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 07:55:35PM -0600, Michael Hipp wrote: > Good summary, Joel. Do you have a copy of OpenOffice handy to try also? > > Joel Hamme

Re: Reading Documents with Various editors

2002-02-12 Thread Bill Campbell
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 07:55:35PM -0600, Michael Hipp wrote: >Good summary, Joel. Do you have a copy of OpenOffice handy to try also? > >Joel Hammer pontificated eloquently: >> We got at memo a work today, a 300 word memo in Word that was 45 KB >> long. It has a small corporate logo on it. I dec

Re: Reading Documents with Various editors

2002-02-12 Thread Michael Scottaline
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002 20:35:12 -0500 Joel Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled in frustration: >BTW, I used staroffice 5.2, not 5.3. I don't know if there is a 5.3. >Joel = was gonna ask about that ;o) BTW, I'll bet 6.0 will do even better, and .xlm compressed format saves e

Re: Reading Documents with Various editors

2002-02-12 Thread Michael Hipp
Good summary, Joel. Do you have a copy of OpenOffice handy to try also? Joel Hammer pontificated eloquently: > We got at memo a work today, a 300 word memo in Word that was 45 KB > long. It has a small corporate logo on it. I decided to experiment. > Using Word97, I saved it in four formats, DOC

Re: Reading Documents with Various editors

2002-02-12 Thread Joel Hammer
BTW, I used staroffice 5.2, not 5.3. I don't know if there is a 5.3. Joel ___ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.

Reading Documents with Various editors

2002-02-12 Thread Joel Hammer
We got at memo a work today, a 300 word memo in Word that was 45 KB long. It has a small corporate logo on it. I decided to experiment. Using Word97, I saved it in four formats, DOC, HTM, RFT, and TXT, with the following file sizes: 46k .DOC 3.2k .HTM 196k .RTF 2.0k .TXT So, RTF is the b