On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 04:17:48PM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> Recent versions of Debian use ncursesw, but Red Hat 9 seems to use
> slang:
Ok, now I've gone through all the trouble of getting the latest mutt
sources from CVS (because bulding 1.5.6 against slang is broken),
updating my pat
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 04:17:48PM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> Judging by the library name this is supposed to work, so can you
> describe a reproducible bug?
I don't use Red Hat's RPM for mutt, because it has a number of
annoying problems and isn't configured the way I want it to be. It
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 09:29:50PM +0300, Vasilis Vasaitis wrote:
> On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 10:27:10PM +0900, Derek Martin wrote:
>
> ..[snip]..
>
> > in Gaim. =8^) Now if only Mutt will work properly with UTF-8...
>
> Err... I'm reading these messages in
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 04:10:44PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> For the (aspirant) multilinguals among us, I would say no. The ability
> to change input methods on the fly, halfway through filling in a form,
> is somewhat cruicial.
>
> (For this, xim seems to be mostly useless.)
Not so, a
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 01:34:36AM +0300, Vasilis Vasaitis wrote:
> > Do you know why that is?
>
> GTK+ strives to be portable over many platforms (X, Win32, linux
> framebuffer, etc.). As such, it has been decided that it cannot rely
> on the input methods provided by each platform, so instead
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 05:10:42PM +0300, Vasilis Vasaitis wrote:
> Programs that use the GTK+ library use GTK+'s own composition
> mechanism by default, instead of the one supplied by X.
Do you know why that is?
> You can switch that temporarily for a text box, by right clicking on
> it and sel
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 02:23:14PM +0900, Derek Martin wrote:
> [Originally I sent this privately, but I'm resending to the list
> because I got no response.
FWIW, I just noticed that I received a bounce when I replied
privately. The mail server on your end seems to have trouble
r
[Originally I sent this privately, but I'm resending to the list
because I got no response. I imagine that it's because you've been
busy, but I also can conceive that you have some sort of filtering in
place to get rid of non-list mail sent to addresses subscribed to
mailing lists. In fact, I som
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 09:52:56PM +0900, Derek Martin wrote:
> 안녕 하세요 신정식씨?
Sigh. Bitten by list reply-to headers again. This was supposed to be
a private reply... Sorry!
Derek
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
안녕 하세요 신정식씨?
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 08:43:09PM +0900, Jungshik Shin wrote:
> Please, read what I wrote more carefully. I did write that deleting
> the last letter is more useful when you're in the middle of typing a
> sequence of letter to form a syllable.
I think we're talking past eachother
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 03:51:22PM +0900, Jungshik Shin wrote:
> Even worse yet, it depends on when, who and where. If a 'grapheme'
> (e.g. a 'syllable' in Indic scripts, Korean script) is being formed when
> 'backspace' is entered, it's desirable to erase just one combining
> character. For 'co
11 matches
Mail list logo
