On 8-12-2016 23:35, Dmitry Shmidt wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Arend Van Spriel
> <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com> wrote:
>> On 7-12-2016 19:39, Dmitry Shmidt wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Johannes Berg
>>> <johan...@sipsolutions
On 8-12-2016 18:52, Malinen, Jouni wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 09:03:23PM +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>> On 7-12-2016 10:33, Vamsi, Krishna wrote:
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Johannes Berg [mailto:johan...@sipsolutions.net]
>>>
On 8-12-2016 1:40, Pan Bian wrote:
> Function orinoco_ioctl_commit() returns 0 (indicates success) when the
> call to orinoco_lock() fails. Thus, the return value is inconsistent with
> the execution status. It may be better to return "-EBUSY" when the call
> to orinoco_lock() fails.
>
>
On 7-12-2016 19:39, Dmitry Shmidt wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Johannes Berg
> wrote:
>>
>>> Indeed, results are results. I just want to take care of two things:
>>> 1) Memory consumption - we can clear stale scan results for
>>> connection, but not for
On 2-12-2016 22:59, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> From: vamsi krishna
>
> Enhance sched scan to support option of finding a better BSS while in
> connected state. Firmware scans the medium and reports when it finds a
> known BSS which has better RSSI than the current connected
On 7-12-2016 10:33, Vamsi, Krishna wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Johannes Berg [mailto:johan...@sipsolutions.net]
>
>> What about Arend's comment regarding this functionality overlapping with the
>> BSS selection offload configuration?
>>
>> Do you think there's any ability to
On 30-11-2016 9:22, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-11-28 at 21:07 +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>>
>> I was wondering about the meaning of the term "parent_bssid". Given
>> your remark it means something else than my guess. I actually meant
>> the dis
On 29-11-2016 13:59, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-11-23 at 15:59 +0800, Chris Chiu wrote:
>> ieee80211_iface_work() will check if sw scanning is in progress
>> before handling block ack session. In our case, the RTL8821AE
>> operate in station mode, when tx session expired, DELBA packet
On 29-11-2016 8:37, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 23 November 2016 at 11:25, Arend van Spriel
> <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com> wrote:
>> This patch series contains:
>> * cleanup of scheduled scan code.
>> * fix handling schedules scan results for newer chips.
>
On 29-11-2016 10:10, IgorMitsyanko wrote:
> On 11/29/2016 06:49 AM, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
>> Am 28.11.2016 um 20:01 schrieb IgorMitsyanko:
>>> On 11/28/2016 08:33 PM, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
Am 28.11.2016 um 18:10 schrieb Oleksij Rempel:
[...]
>>> Oleksij, yes, that's correct, it includes
On 29-11-2016 8:57, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-11-29 at 08:08 +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 23 November 2016 at 11:25, Arend van Spriel
>> <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Introducing new source file for pno related functiona
On 28-11-2016 15:38, Johannes Berg wrote:
>
>> * the nl80211 feature flags for the device.
>> + * @NL80211_SCAN_FLAGS_IE_DATA: request the device to supply IE data
>> in the
>> + * request.
>
> What does that mean?
I meant "supply IE data in the result". So it informs the driver that
On 28-11-2016 15:32, Johannes Berg wrote:
>
>> + * @distance: distance to AP with %parent_bssid in centimeters. Zero
>> + * value indicates this is undetermined.
>> + * @var_distance: variance of %distance indicating accurracy.
>
> accuracy
>
> The distance between the two APs? Where are you
On 23-11-2016 23:07, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> From: vamsi krishna
>
> Enhance sched scan to support option of finding a better BSS while in
> connected state. Firmware scans the medium and reports when it finds a
> known BSS which has a significantly better RSSI than the
-drivers-next repository.
Arend van Spriel (11):
brcmfmac: add support for 43341 chip
brcmfmac: move pno helper functions in separate source file
brcmfmac: fix handling ssids in .sched_scan_start() callback
brcmfmac: change prototype for brcmf_do_escan()
brcmfmac: make internal escan more
com>
Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieter-paul.giesbe...@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Franky Lin <franky@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com>
---
.../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c | 103 ++---
.
ule...@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieter-paul.giesbe...@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Franky Lin <franky@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com>
---
.../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c | 24 +-
com>
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com>
---
.../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c | 65 +---
.../net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pno.c | 110 +
.../net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pno.h | 29 +-
3 file
com>
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c | 10 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c
b/drivers/net/wir
viewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieter-paul.giesbe...@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Franky Lin <franky@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 1 i
Lin <franky@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com>
---
.../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c | 11 +++-
.../net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pno.c | 60 --
.../net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pno.h | 17 +++
adcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Franky Lin <franky@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c | 1 +
drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pno.c | 6 +-
drivers/net/wir
Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieter-paul.giesbe...@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Franky Lin <franky@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com>
---
.../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c | 187 -
.../broadcom/brcm8
viewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieter-paul.giesbe...@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Franky Lin <franky@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com>
---
.../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fwil_types.h | 16 +
.../net/wireless/bro
On 22-11-2016 21:54, Dmitry Shmidt wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Arend Van Spriel
> <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com> wrote:
>> On 22-11-2016 18:29, Dmitry Shmidt wrote:
>>> Hi Luca,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 11:24 PM, Luca Coelho <l.
On 22-11-2016 18:05, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 November 2016 17:14:28 Michal Kazior wrote:
>> On 22 November 2016 at 16:31, Pali Rohár wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 22 November 2016 16:22:57 Michal Kazior wrote:
On 21 November 2016 at 16:51, Pali Rohár
On 22-11-2016 18:29, Dmitry Shmidt wrote:
> Hi Luca,
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 11:24 PM, Luca Coelho wrote:
>> Hi Dmitry,
>> On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 22:47 +, dimitr...@google.com wrote:
>>> From 68a9d37a4c7e9dc7a90a6e922cdea52737a98d66 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From:
On 22-11-2016 14:38, Johannes Berg wrote:
>
>> +if (wiphy->min_sched_scan_plan_interval &&
>> +request->scan_plans[i].interval <
>> +wiphy->min_sched_scan_plan_interval)
>> +return -EINVAL;
>>
> I'm not sure we should break the API
The interval for scheduled scan may have a minimum value for
the device. Allow drivers to specify a minimum value in the
struct wiphy so user-space interval values can be validated
against it.
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com>
---
include/net/cfg80211.h
On 22-11-2016 11:22, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> When user-space does not provide scheduled scan plans, ie. uses the
> old scheduled scan API containing NL80211_ATTR_SCHED_SCAN_INTERVAL.
> The interval value passed by user-space is validated against
> struct wiphy::max_sched_scan_p
On 22-11-2016 10:19, Luca Coelho wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 10:10 +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>> On 22-11-2016 6:59, Luca Coelho wrote:
>>> Oh, I see. The problem is that the "max_sched_scan_plan_interval" was
>>> intro
validation
has been simalarly adjusted to assure the limit is non-zero.
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com>
---
net/wireless/nl80211.c | 8 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/wireless/nl80211.c b/net/wireless/nl80211.c
index 2
On 22-11-2016 10:19, Luca Coelho wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 10:10 +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>> On 22-11-2016 6:59, Luca Coelho wrote:
>>> Oh, I see. The problem is that the "max_sched_scan_plan_interval" was
>>> intro
On 22-11-2016 6:59, Luca Coelho wrote:
> Hi Arend,
> On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 20:34 +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>> On 21-11-2016 16:08, Luca Coelho wrote:
>>> Hi Arend,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 13:03 +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>>>> On 21
On 21-11-2016 16:08, Luca Coelho wrote:
> Hi Arend,
>
> On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 13:03 +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>> On 21-11-2016 12:30, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>>> On 21-11-2016 12:19, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>>>> Hi Johannes, Luca,
>>>>
&g
On 21-11-2016 17:59, Dave Taht wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Luca Coelho <l...@coelho.fi> wrote:
>> Hi Arend,
>>
>> On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 13:03 +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>>> On 21-11-2016 12:30, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>>>> On 21
On 21-11-2016 13:57, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> On 21-11-2016 13:55, Johannes Berg wrote:
>> From: Johannes Berg <johannes.b...@intel.com>
>>
>> Arend inadvertedly inverted the logic while converting to
>> wdev_running(), fix that.
>
> It was indeed i
On 21-11-2016 13:55, Johannes Berg wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg
>
> Arend inadvertedly inverted the logic while converting to
> wdev_running(), fix that.
It was indeed inadvertedly.
Thanks,
Arend
> Fixes: 73c7da3dae1e ("cfg80211: add generic helper to check interface
On 21-11-2016 12:19, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> Hi Johannes, Luca,
>
> The gscan work made me look at scheduled scan and the implementation of
> it in brcmfmac. The driver ignored the interval parameter from
> user-space. Now I am fixing that. One thing is that our firmware
Hi Johannes, Luca,
The gscan work made me look at scheduled scan and the implementation of
it in brcmfmac. The driver ignored the interval parameter from
user-space. Now I am fixing that. One thing is that our firmware has a
minimum interval which can not be indicated in struct wiphy. The other
+ linux-wireless
On 20-11-2016 14:26, Familie Stepniak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I try run Ubuntu 16.10 on the Trekstor W2 Tablet but Wi-Fi donts work..
> that find WLAN-Network, I give to Passwort and Nothing.. the chip ist
> BCM4356B.. please Help me to install the true Driver on the Linux-Ubuntu..
On 16-11-2016 23:47, dimitr...@google.com wrote:
> From 68a9d37a4c7e9dc7a90a6e922cdea52737a98d66 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Dmitry Shmidt
> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:27:26 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] RFC: Universal scan proposal
>
> Currently we have sched scan with
On 17-11-2016 15:39, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 13:18 +0000, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>> Android employs a Wifi-HAL layer in its wireless frame. It basically
>> abstracts dealing with netlink messages from the framework. For some
>> features it employs nl
On 17-11-2016 17:15, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 11:39 +0000, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>> Add distance and its variance to the BSS structure so drivers
>> may provide RTT information for BSS instances found during
>> scanning.
>>
>> Reviewe
From: Arend van Spriel <ar...@broadcom.com>
GScan is a scan offload feature used in recent Android releases. This
patch adds possibility for wireless device drivers to report their
capabilities and provide it to user-space.
Reviewed-by: Hante Meuleman <hante.meule...@broadcom.com&
aming them to
nl80211_send_scan_event{,_msg}().
Reviewed-by: Hante Meuleman <hante.meule...@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieter-paul.giesbe...@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Franky Lin <franky@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com>
This patch adds support for GScan which is a scan offload feature
used in Android.
Reviewed-by: Hante Meuleman <hante.meule...@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieter-paul.giesbe...@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Franky Lin <franky@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by
The driver can indicate gscan results are available or gscan operation
has stopped.
Reviewed-by: Hante Meuleman <hante.meule...@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieter-paul.giesbe...@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Franky Lin <franky@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by
On 17-11-2016 12:39, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> The driver can indicate gscan results are available or gscan operation
> has stopped.
>
> Reviewed-by: Hante Meuleman <hante.meule...@broadcom.com>
> Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieter-paul.giesbe...@broadcom.com>
;
> url:
> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Arend-van-Spriel/cfg80211-get-rid-of-name-indirection-trick-for-ieee80211_get_channel/20161117-175449
> base:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jberg/mac80211-next.git master
> config: x86_64-allmodconfig (attached a
The comment on the name indirection suggested an issue but turned out
to be untrue. Digging in older kernel version showed issue with ipw2x00
but that is no longer true so get rid on the name indirection.
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com>
---
drivers/net/wirele
the system]
>
> url:
> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Arend-van-Spriel/nl80211-add-support-for-g-scan/20161117-194818
> base:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jberg/mac80211-next.git master
> config: i386-randconfig-x004-201646 (attached as .co
Lin <franky@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com>
---
include/net/cfg80211.h | 11 +++
include/uapi/linux/nl80211.h | 6 ++
net/wireless/nl80211.c | 8
net/wireless/scan.c | 2 ++
4 files changed, 27 i
those use-case(s).
A current hurdle for me is that the device stores m scans so a BSS could end up
in the result of either of them. However, cfg80211 stores BSS-es uniquely with
latest scan information. Does user-space need results per scan or is flat BSS
storage fine.
Anyway, here is some more fuel t
This patch adds support for GScan which is a scan offload feature
used in Android.
Reviewed-by: Hante Meuleman <hante.meule...@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieter-paul.giesbe...@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Franky Lin <franky@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by
From: Arend van Spriel <ar...@broadcom.com>
GScan is a scan offload feature used in recent Android releases. This
patch adds possibility for wireless device drivers to report their
capabilities and provide it to user-space.
Reviewed-by: Hante Meuleman <hante.meule...@broadcom.com&
The driver can indicate gscan results are available or gscan operation
has stopped.
Reviewed-by: Hante Meuleman <hante.meule...@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieter-paul.giesbe...@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Franky Lin <franky@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by
aming them to
nl80211_send_scan_event{,_msg}().
Reviewed-by: Hante Meuleman <hante.meule...@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieter-paul.giesbe...@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Franky Lin <franky@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com>
The presence of the NL80211_ATTR_SCHED_SCAN_INTERVAL attribute was
checked in nl80211_parse_sched_scan() and
nl80211_parse_sched_scan_plans() which might be a bit redundant
so removing one.
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com>
---
net/wireless/nl80211.c | 5 +-
The comment on the name indirection suggested an issue but turned out
to be untrue. Digging in older kernel version showed issue with ipw2x00
but that is no longer true so get rid on the name indirection.
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com>
---
include/net/cfg8
On 15-11-2016 12:10, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Gianfranco Costamagna writes:
>
>>> Well, not before you pointed it out ;-). You are welcome to send a patch
>>> fixing it. Otherwise, I will take care of it.
>>
>> attaching a format-patch like version.
>> I don't think we need
On 14-11-2016 12:34, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi Arend,
>
>
>> Finally response. As it turns out the range was explcitly changed
>
>> enabling channels 12 and 13 to be used where applicable. They forgot to
>> update the comment.
>
>
> so, the struct in net/wireless/reg.c is actually
On 28-10-2016 22:41, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> On 28-10-2016 18:15, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>> (resending from my debian.org mail address, to avoid spam filtering)
>>
>> Hi Broadcom developers and linux wireless list.
>>
>> We found a possible iss
On 19-10-2016 14:34, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 10/04/2016 08:15 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> # My smartphone remains in the same place (1 m from the AP) but there
>> is some
>> # connection/A-MPDU problem.
>> Tue Oct 4 17:22:22 2016 kern.debug kernel: [ 247.509120] brcmfmac:
>> CONSOLE:
Hi Johannes,
Since commit a442b761b24b ("cfg80211: add add_nan_func / del_nan_func")
there is a cookie_counter in the wiphy object. It is only used by the
add_nan_func now, but do we want to consolidate all cookie returning
functions to use this cookie counter, eg. in .remain_on_channel callback.
On 21-10-16 15:01, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 15:57 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> It's easier to manage the kernel-doc for the fields when they
>> documentation is next to the field.
>
> Hah, I wasn't even aware this was possible. Thanks!
Me neither. I actually found it annoying
On 20-10-2016 14:45, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 14:44 +0200, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>>
>> Sure. On top of this patch or will you deal with those conflicts?
>>
>
> I already applied this, so on top please (i.e. just resend what you
> just had
Adding a helper using wdev to check if interface is running. This
deals with both non-netdev and netdev interfaces. In struct
wireless_dev replacing 'p2p_started' and 'nan_started' by
'is_running' as those are mutual exclusive anyway.
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.
On 19-10-2016 6:47, Luca Coelho wrote:
> From: Andrei Otcheretianski
>
> Allow vendor commands that require WIPHY_VENDOR_CMD_NEED_RUNNING flag, to
> be sent to NAN interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrei Otcheretianski
>
Ok. Did you also try the firmware I sent you?
Regards,
Arend
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Rafał Miłecki <zaj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/05/2016 11:08 AM, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>>
>> On 4-10-2016 20:15, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>>
>>> On 0
On 13-10-16 17:39, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> From: vamsi krishna
>
> Add functionality to update the connection parameters when in connected
> state, so that driver/firmware uses the updated parameters for
> subsequent roaming. This is for drivers that support internal BSS
On 12-10-16 16:27, Jörg Krause wrote:
> On Mi, 2016-10-12 at 10:11 +0200, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>> On 11-10-2016 8:14, Jörg Krause wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Arend,
>>>
>>> Am 22. September 2016 16:00:36 MESZ, schrieb Arend Van Sprie
On 12-10-16 16:26, Gucea Doru wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Arend van Spriel
> <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com> wrote:
>> On 07-10-16 16:33, Gucea Doru wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Arend Van Spriel
>>> <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com
On 11-10-2016 8:14, Jörg Krause wrote:
>
>
> Hi Arend,
>
> Am 22. September 2016 16:00:36 MESZ, schrieb Arend Van Spriel
> <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com>:
>> Op 22 sep. 2016 14:52 schreef "Jörg Krause"
>> <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks>:
>&g
On 07-10-16 16:33, Gucea Doru wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Arend Van Spriel
> <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com> wrote:
>> On 6-10-2016 10:07, Gucea Doru wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Arend Van Spriel
>>> <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com
On 6-10-2016 10:07, Gucea Doru wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Arend Van Spriel
> <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com> wrote:
>> On 4-10-2016 13:39, Gucea Doru wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Arend van Spriel
>>>> <arend.vanspr...@broadcom
On 4-10-2016 13:39, Gucea Doru wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Arend van Spriel
>> <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 29-09-16 13:32, Gucea Doru wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Gucea Doru <gucea.d..
On 4-10-2016 20:15, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 09/28/2015 11:00 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> I'm using recent brcmfmac and brcmfmac43602-pcie.ap.bin that currently
>> sits in linux-firmware.git.
>>
>> In OpenWrt we have hostapd with a feature of banning STAs. It works in
>> a quite simple way.
On 20-09-16 22:57, Lior David wrote:
> On 9/20/2016 9:39 AM, Luca Coelho wrote:
>> On Mon, 2016-09-19 at 20:42 +0200, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>>>
>>> On 19-9-2016 19:31, Lior David wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Johannes,
>>>>
>>>>
On 29-09-16 13:32, Gucea Doru wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Gucea Doru wrote:
>> What is the decision triggering the exit from the PS mode immediately
>> after the ping request? I am asking this because 802.11 PS legacy
>> specifies that the client should wait
On 29-9-2016 23:57, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 27 September 2016 at 11:24, Arend Van Spriel
> <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com> wrote:
>> On 26-9-2016 14:38, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>> On 26 September 2016 at 14:13, Rafał Miłecki <zaj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
On 27-9-2016 13:58, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 27 September 2016 at 13:44, Rafał Miłecki <zaj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 27 September 2016 at 13:27, Kalle Valo <kv...@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>> Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com> writes:
>>>
On 27-9-2016 13:27, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com> writes:
>
>> On 27-9-2016 11:14, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>> From: Rafał Miłecki <ra...@milecki.pl>
>>>
>>> Flowrings contain skbs waiting for transmission that
On 27-9-2016 12:56, Amitkumar Karwar wrote:
> From: lihz
Also the mailing list is no longer at shmoo.com. Should be:
hos...@lists.infradead.org
Regards,
Arend
anymore
> and backtrace wasn't much useful.
Indeed the interesting part would be in another context. So:
Acked-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <ra...@milecki.pl>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/c
On 27-9-2016 12:56, Amitkumar Karwar wrote:
> From: lihz
minor thing. Could you use another prefix iso 'nl80211:'. That has
different expectation for me at least, ie. changes in nl80211 api, but
this patch is for hostap repo so 'hostap:' or 'wpa_supp:' would be
better fit here.
use freeing function
> that will check for 802.1x type as well.
>
> Freeing skbs without a proper check was leading to counter not being
> properly decreased. This was triggering a WARNING every time
> brcmf_netdev_wait_pend8021x was called.
Acked-by: Arend van Spriel <ar.
On 26-9-2016 14:38, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 26 September 2016 at 14:13, Rafał Miłecki <zaj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 26 September 2016 at 13:46, Arend Van Spriel
>> <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com> wrote:
>>> On 26-9-2016 12:23, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>&g
On 26-9-2016 16:59, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 14:13 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 26 September 2016 at 13:46, Arend Van Spriel
>> <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 26-9-2016 12:23, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>
On 26-9-2016 14:13, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 26 September 2016 at 13:46, Arend Van Spriel
> <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com> wrote:
>> On 26-9-2016 12:23, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>> From: Rafał Miłecki <ra...@milecki.pl>
>>>
>>> We need to track 8
On 26-9-2016 12:23, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki
>
> We need to track 802.1x packets to know if there are any pending ones
> for transmission. This is required for performing key update in the
> firmware.
The problem we are trying to solve is a pretty old one.
On 24-9-2016 22:44, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki
>
> There are two protocols used by Broadcom FullMAC devices: BCDC and
> msgbuf. They use different ways for (some part of) communication with
> the firmware. Firmware Signaling is required for the first one only
>
On 21-9-2016 8:23, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <ra...@milecki.pl>
>
> This function is called from get_station callback which means that every
> time user space was getting/dumping station(s) we were leaking 2 KiB.
>
Acked-by: Arend van Spriel <aren
On 19-9-2016 8:36, Jörg Krause wrote:
> Hi Arend,
>
> On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 20:13 +0200, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>> On 14-9-2016 15:41, Jörg Krause wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2016-08-29 at 23:15 +0200, Jörg Krause wrote:
>>>>
On 19-09-16 08:36, Jörg Krause wrote:
> Hi Arend,
>
> On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 20:13 +0200, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>> On 14-9-2016 15:41, Jörg Krause wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2016-08-29 at 23:15 +0200, Jörg Krause wrote:
>>>>
On 20-9-2016 16:31, Luca Coelho wrote:
> From: Luca Coelho
>
> Hi,
>
> Now v3 of the NAN patchset. Ayala has taken care of the kbuild bot
> compilation errors and of all Arend's comments, except for the one
> about adding a helper function instead checking for
On 20-9-2016 16:36, Luca Coelho wrote:
> Hi Arend,
>
> On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 14:29 +0200, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>> On 20-9-2016 13:45, Beker, Ayala wrote:
>>> I don't think there is something in common to those interface types
>>> that can fit such a fu
On 20-9-2016 13:45, Beker, Ayala wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Arend Van Spriel [mailto:arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com]
> Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2016 22:01
> To: Otcheretianski, Andrei <andrei.otcheretian...@intel.com>; Luca Coelho
> <l...@coelho.fi>
On 20-9-2016 8:43, Prameela Rani Garnepudi wrote:
> From: Prameela Rani Garnepudi
>
> Signed-off-by: Prameela Rani Garnepudi
> Signed-off-by: Prameela Rani Garnepudi
Now you are
On 19-9-2016 19:31, Lior David wrote:
> Hi Johannes,
>
> We are working on adding indoor location support to the wil6210 11ad driver.
> This includes fine timing measurement (FTM) as well as something we call
> angle of arrival (AOA) which measures azimuth and elevation.
> Initially we
1101 - 1200 of 2045 matches
Mail list logo