RE: [PATCH 7/8] mwifiex: don't print an error if an optional DT property is missing

2016-06-09 Thread Amitkumar Karwar
ifiex: don't print an error if an optional DT > property is missing > > Hi Javier, > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:51 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas > wrote: > > Hello Julian, > > > > Thanks a lot for your feedback and reviews. > > > > On 06/01/20

Re: [PATCH 7/8] mwifiex: don't print an error if an optional DT property is missing

2016-06-01 Thread Julian Calaby
Hi Javier, On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:51 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello Julian, > > Thanks a lot for your feedback and reviews. > > On 06/01/2016 12:20 AM, Julian Calaby wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas >> wrote: >>> The Documentation

Re: [PATCH 7/8] mwifiex: don't print an error if an optional DT property is missing

2016-06-01 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Julian, Thanks a lot for your feedback and reviews. On 06/01/2016 12:20 AM, Julian Calaby wrote: > Hi All, > > On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas > wrote: >> The Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/marvell-sd8xxx.txt DT >> binding document say that the "

Re: [PATCH 7/8] mwifiex: don't print an error if an optional DT property is missing

2016-05-31 Thread Julian Calaby
Hi All, On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > The Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/marvell-sd8xxx.txt DT > binding document say that the "interrupts" property in the child node is > optional. So the property being missed shouldn't be treated as an error

[PATCH 7/8] mwifiex: don't print an error if an optional DT property is missing

2016-05-27 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
The Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/marvell-sd8xxx.txt DT binding document say that the "interrupts" property in the child node is optional. So the property being missed shouldn't be treated as an error. Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas --- drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwi