Happy new year!
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:27:18PM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 03/09/15 21:54, Daniel Glöckner wrote:
> >On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 06:34:24PM +0100, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
> >>On Sunday 21 December 2014 16:03:17 Arend van Spriel wrote:
> >>>On 12/21/14 15:24, Maximilian
On 03/09/15 21:54, Daniel Glöckner wrote:
Hi Arend,
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 06:34:24PM +0100, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
On Sunday 21 December 2014 16:03:17 Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 12/21/14 15:24, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
On Sunday 21 December 2014 15:13:50 Arend van Spriel wrote:
T
Hi Arend,
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 06:34:24PM +0100, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
> On Sunday 21 December 2014 16:03:17 Arend van Spriel wrote:
> > On 12/21/14 15:24, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
> > > On Sunday 21 December 2014 15:13:50 Arend van Spriel wrote:
> > >> Thanks. It shows you have have
On Sunday 21 December 2014 16:03:17 Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 12/21/14 15:24, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
> > On Sunday 21 December 2014 15:13:50 Arend van Spriel wrote:
> >> On 12/21/14 15:08, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
> >>> On Sunday 21 December 2014 11:12:40 Arend van Spriel wrote:
>
On 12/21/14 15:24, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
On Sunday 21 December 2014 15:13:50 Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 12/21/14 15:08, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
On Sunday 21 December 2014 11:12:40 Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 12/21/14 10:58, Michael Tokarev wrote:
16.12.2014 19:51, Arend van Spriel
On Sunday 21 December 2014 15:13:50 Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 12/21/14 15:08, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
> > On Sunday 21 December 2014 11:12:40 Arend van Spriel wrote:
> >> On 12/21/14 10:58, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> >>> 16.12.2014 19:51, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> Hmm. The function brcms
On 12/21/14 15:08, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
On Sunday 21 December 2014 11:12:40 Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 12/21/14 10:58, Michael Tokarev wrote:
16.12.2014 19:51, Arend van Spriel wrote:
Hmm. The function brcms_btc_ecicoex_enab() is calling itself. Please
remove that call as it causes end
On Sunday 21 December 2014 11:12:40 Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 12/21/14 10:58, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > 16.12.2014 19:51, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> >> Hmm. The function brcms_btc_ecicoex_enab() is calling itself. Please
> >> remove that call as it causes endless recursion and eventually reboot.
On 12/21/14 11:27, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[73327.029460] brcmsmac bcma0:1: hardware: SECI
Well,
The piece of info is small, but it is there ;-)
Thanks,
Arend
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More
[Trimming Cc list a bit]
21.12.2014 13:12, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 12/21/14 10:58, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> 16.12.2014 19:51, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>>
>>> Hmm. The function brcms_btc_ecicoex_enab() is calling itself. Please remove
>>> that call as it causes endless recursion and eventuall
On 12/21/14 11:00, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Attaching a picture of the board, too. One of the two similar
boards I have (another has lenovo sticker on it).
Also available as http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/BRCM94313HMGB.JPG
(I wonder if broadcom does not have any of these cards anymore... ;)
Probably
On 12/21/14 10:58, Michael Tokarev wrote:
16.12.2014 19:51, Arend van Spriel wrote:
Hmm. The function brcms_btc_ecicoex_enab() is calling itself. Please remove
that call as it causes endless recursion and eventually reboot.
Ok, that was easy. Now it loads, but wifi link still
does not work,
16.12.2014 19:51, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> Hmm. The function brcms_btc_ecicoex_enab() is calling itself. Please remove
> that call as it causes endless recursion and eventually reboot.
Ok, that was easy. Now it loads, but wifi link still
does not work, stalling as before. What we're looking
a
On 12/03/14 13:43, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 12/02/14 22:40, Michael Tokarev wrote:
30.11.2014 15:04, Arend van Spriel wrote:
Thanks. Did not find what I was looking for, but I started working on
integrating btcoex related functionality. The attached patch will print
some info so I can focus
On 12/02/14 22:40, Michael Tokarev wrote:
30.11.2014 15:04, Arend van Spriel wrote:
Thanks. Did not find what I was looking for, but I started working on
integrating btcoex related functionality. The attached patch will print
some info so I can focus on the required functionality for your devic
30.11.2014 15:04, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> Thanks. Did not find what I was looking for, but I started working on
> integrating btcoex related functionality. The attached patch will print
> some info so I can focus on the required functionality for your device.
> It is based on 3.18-rc5.
With thi
Hi Arend,
sorry for my late reply, it took me a bit to get the modules compiled with
your patches. Here is the information from my card. During this test I had
very bad performance with my wifi connection with big latency and lots of
packet loss.
[ 1642.407735] bcma: bus0: Found chip with id 0
On 26-11-14 10:52, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> I'm sorry this took so long - I was AFK during weekend and had
> to deal with a huge backlog after that. Now it is all sorted.
>
> 23.11.2014 12:43, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>> On 19-11-14 22:00, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> []
>> Well, it shows tx looks ok,
I'm sorry this took so long - I was AFK during weekend and had
to deal with a huge backlog after that. Now it is all sorted.
23.11.2014 12:43, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 19-11-14 22:00, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
> Well, it shows tx looks ok, but with download there is not much of that
> going o
On 19-11-14 22:00, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 19.11.2014 22:58, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> 19.11.2014 20:54, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> []
>>> I submitted two patches upstream and additionally I have attached two other
>>> that are still under review. Could you try these patches and sent me the
>>> c
19.11.2014 22:58, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 19.11.2014 20:54, Arend van Spriel wrote:
[]
>> I submitted two patches upstream and additionally I have attached two other
>> that are still under review. Could you try these patches and sent me the
>> content of the two debugfs files 'macstat' and 'har
19.11.2014 20:54, Arend van Spriel wrote:
[]
> In our last email exchange I got the impression you switch to Intel board and
> did not want to keep replacing cards for testing.
I especially wrote that I have several days to try things out and
if you'll be quick it will be possible for me to test
On 11/19/14 10:04, Michael Tokarev wrote:
18.11.2014 01:36, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
[]
I just wanted to ask if there is any progress on this issue since I haven't
heard anything for a month. Please let me know if you need any additional
information.
I've no idea if there's any progress.
On 11/19/14 14:46, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 11/17/14 23:36, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
On Thursday 09 October 2014 10:21:12 Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 9 October 2014 09:52, Arend van Spriel wrote:
I have been staring at differences brcmsmac and our internal driver
(which
wl is derived from as
On 11/17/14 23:36, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
On Thursday 09 October 2014 10:21:12 Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 9 October 2014 09:52, Arend van Spriel wrote:
I have been staring at differences brcmsmac and our internal driver (which
wl is derived from as well). Would you be able to make an mmiotr
18.11.2014 01:36, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
[]
> I just wanted to ask if there is any progress on this issue since I haven't
> heard anything for a month. Please let me know if you need any additional
> information.
I've no idea if there's any progress. Meanwhile I've an easy way of
testing
On Thursday 09 October 2014 10:21:12 Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 9 October 2014 09:52, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> > I have been staring at differences brcmsmac and our internal driver (which
> > wl is derived from as well). Would you be able to make an mmiotrace
> > loading
> > wl and brcmsmac.
>
>
On 9 October 2014 09:52, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> I have been staring at differences brcmsmac and our internal driver (which
> wl is derived from as well). Would you be able to make an mmiotrace loading
> wl and brcmsmac.
Arend,
As you noticed earlier, this is a WiFi card with BT. I've checked
On 10/09/14 00:19, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
On Tuesday 30 September 2014 12:06:10 Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 09/29/14 21:40, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
On Monday 29 September 2014 15:44:03 Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 09/26/14 17:20, Michael Tokarev wrote:
I can send it your way, -- guess
On Tuesday 30 September 2014 12:06:10 Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 09/29/14 21:40, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
> > On Monday 29 September 2014 15:44:03 Arend van Spriel wrote:
> >> On 09/26/14 17:20, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> >>> I can send it your way, -- guess it will be quite a bit costly,
> >>>
On 09/29/14 21:40, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
On Monday 29 September 2014 15:44:03 Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 09/26/14 17:20, Michael Tokarev wrote:
I can send it your way, -- guess it will be quite a bit costly,
but I don't have any use for it anyway (short of throwing it
away), and since I
On Monday 29 September 2014 15:44:03 Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 09/26/14 17:20, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > I can send it your way, -- guess it will be quite a bit costly,
> > but I don't have any use for it anyway (short of throwing it
> > away), and since I already spent significantly more money
On 09/26/14 17:20, Michael Tokarev wrote:
I can send it your way, -- guess it will be quite a bit costly,
but I don't have any use for it anyway (short of throwing it
away), and since I already spent significantly more money due
to all this (whole thinkpad plus ssds and several wifi adaptors),
th
26.09.2014 18:42, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> Being bold here, but would you be willing to send that non-working part of
> hardware to me. I seem to have 4313 cards over here that just work and it
> would help greatly investigating the issue. I guess you do not care that much
> anymore, but might
On 09/26/14 16:26, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Okay, so finally, today, without any updates from your side,
I opened up the laptop again and inserted a newly bought
Intel 6235ANHMW card instead of this creaky brcm4313. This
card works right out of the box - plug it in and set up,
both wifi and blueto
Okay, so finally, today, without any updates from your side,
I opened up the laptop again and inserted a newly bought
Intel 6235ANHMW card instead of this creaky brcm4313. This
card works right out of the box - plug it in and set up,
both wifi and bluetooth (I had numerous probs with bluetooth
too
>I looked at the log. I see download commence because the packets
>received of 1562 bytes length. So within one second I see little over
>200 packets so approx. 3Mbps which is not impressive but I don't know
>what can be expected.
When it works it goes 50+ Mbps. I always tested at the same pla
On 09/23/14 20:10, Michael Tokarev wrote:
23.09.2014 21:35, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 09/23/14 18:02, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Oh. Indeed. While I enabled it, I recompiled only drivers/net/wireless,
but not net/. Rebuilt, another trace is here --
http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/tmp/brcmsmac-431
23.09.2014 21:35, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 09/23/14 18:02, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> Oh. Indeed. While I enabled it, I recompiled only drivers/net/wireless,
>> but not net/. Rebuilt, another trace is here --
>>
>> http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/tmp/brcmsmac-4313-trace-201409233.dat.gz
>>
>> Than
On 09/23/14 18:02, Michael Tokarev wrote:
23.09.2014 18:31, Seth Forshee пишет:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 06:28:54PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
23.09.2014 18:25, Michael Tokarev wrote:
23.09.2014 17:50, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 09/23/14 15:44, Seth Forshee wrote:
[]
It's been quite some
23.09.2014 18:31, Seth Forshee пишет:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 06:28:54PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> 23.09.2014 18:25, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>>> 23.09.2014 17:50, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 09/23/14 15:44, Seth Forshee wrote:
>> []
> It's been quite some time since I used them, but
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 06:28:54PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 23.09.2014 18:25, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > 23.09.2014 17:50, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> >> On 09/23/14 15:44, Seth Forshee wrote:
> []
> >>> It's been quite some time since I used them, but I think brcmsmac_tx is
> >>> quite noisy
23.09.2014 18:25, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 23.09.2014 17:50, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>> On 09/23/14 15:44, Seth Forshee wrote:
[]
>>> It's been quite some time since I used them, but I think brcmsmac_tx is
>>> quite noisy so you may only want to enable that if you already suspect a
>>> tx problem.
23.09.2014 17:50, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 09/23/14 15:44, Seth Forshee wrote:
[]
>> Well, there are a few different trace events defined for brcmsmac. This
>> would enable the full set:
>>
>> $ trace-cmd record -e brcmsmac -e brcmsmac_tx -e brcmsmac_msg
>>
>> It's been quite some time since
On 09/23/14 15:44, Seth Forshee wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 02:47:45PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 09/23/14 12:04, Michael Tokarev wrote:
21.09.2014 19:30, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Namely, after resume, the card does not work. ARP works, ping and
DNS sometimes/somewhat work, inital TCP
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 02:47:45PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 09/23/14 12:04, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> >21.09.2014 19:30, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> >>Namely, after resume, the card does not work. ARP works, ping and
> >>DNS sometimes/somewhat work, inital TCP connection establisment
> >>wor
On 09/23/14 12:04, Michael Tokarev wrote:
21.09.2014 19:30, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Namely, after resume, the card does not work. ARP works, ping and
DNS sometimes/somewhat work, inital TCP connection establisment
works, but eg http download does not work, it stalls almost
immediately.
It does
21.09.2014 19:30, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Namely, after resume, the card does not work. ARP works, ping and
> DNS sometimes/somewhat work, inital TCP connection establisment
> works, but eg http download does not work, it stalls almost
> immediately.
It does not work at all anymore again. Not on
15.09.2014 12:03, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> Hi Michael,
Hello again! I'm sorry for the long delay, I'll describe what happens
in a moment.
> Did you have any opportunity to create a log file. Got a question from
> someone else who got bad bcm4313 behaviour after a certain upgrade. Did
> you hav
On 27-08-14 17:27, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 08/27/14 12:02, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> 27.08.2014 01:37, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>>> On 08/26/14 18:15, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> []
>>> Well, sorry about that. I did see the other messages fly by and
>>> noticed you were using the wl driver so ass
50 matches
Mail list logo
